L的Daily Writing

loveinwcUID: 3241878

2月27日100306NA some people believe that people should follow their ambitious dreams and goals even they are not realistic, others believe that people should focus on achieving realistic goals.

I have heard a saying that we can’t use the high or the low to discriminate the dream. So first question I want to ask in reply for the statement from the topic is what the distinction between the not realistic and realistic dreams? As we all know, some unrealistic dreams just looked not so easy to achieve. 1000 years ago, people certainly thought that human could land on the moon was just a fictional plot. Base on these doubts, I really can’t accept the viewpoint in the second part as the topic proposed.

In my opinion, something seems unreal maybe because it beyond our technology could reach. Like the moon project,the astronauts have said that famous words,“One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind". Like the Wright brothers, they really did great contribution on our celestial plan, and eventually devoted their young lives in a trial of plane flying. If they did not think of having a try to do that, our planes, our helicopters might emerge later in human history. It is very possible. Without the effort from those who looked like the daydream makers, our scientific technology could not have processed greatly as now. Thus if the educational officials some day really encourage people to focus on achieving realistic dreams rather than unrealistic ones or force them to give up the unrealistic dreams, I don’t know how to count how many achievements of science we will lose?

On the contrary, this is also not meaning that we should encourage people to accomplish the unrealistic goals totally. As far as I am concerned, this statement only mentioning one side is  too extreme to accept. In fact, both dreamers should be existing. With more and more new technological fields development today, how to apply these unfamiliar technologies to practice also should be an important issue. Comparing with the string theory researchers, the scientists researching on kinetic property certainly seem more realistic.  However, it is undeniable that both types of scientists all push our society to advance.

In sum, I believe that people should follow their ambitious dreams and goals, whether they are unrealistic or realistic. Time will prove that they deserve it.

yxlucy321UID: 3258583

76# loveinwc


I have heard a saying that we can’t use the high or the low to discriminate the dream. So(要加the？要不直接first，改错请见谅，水平有限呵呵~) first question I want to ask in reply for the statement from the topic is what the distinction between the not realistic and realistic dreams? As we all know, some unrealistic dreams just looked not so easy to achieve. 1000 years ago, people certainly thought that human could land on the moon was just a fictional plot. Base on these doubts, I really can’t accept the viewpoint in the second part as the topic proposed.9 y* o' A5 P" ?( k7 W9 n* o

- A( V2 r- ?$ g* W, pIn my opinion, something seems unreal maybe（） because it beyonds our technology could reach(technological achievements). Like the moon project,the astronauts have said that famous words,“One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind". Like the Wright brothers, they really did great contribution on(to) our celestial plan, and eventually devoted their young lives in a trial of plane flying. If they did not (用虚拟会更好点吧~~又多一种句型了~~Had they not thought)think of having a try to do that, our planes, our helicopters might emerge later in human history. It is very possible. Without the effort from those who looked like the daydream makers, our scientific technology could not have processed greatly as now. Thus if the educational officials some day really encourage people to focus on achieving realistic dreams rather than unrealistic ones or force them to give up the unrealistic dreams, I don’t know how to count how many achievements of science we will lose(会不会有点罗嗦?there will be countless achievement to lose )?7 t/ W: t/ v% |* x8 h" T
5 Q r+ F: }# j! Y* U; g% o
On the contrary, this is also not meaning that we should encourage people to accomplish the unrealistic goals totally. As far as I am concerned, this statement only mentioning one side is too extreme to accept. In fact, both dreamers should be existing. With more and more new technological fields development today, how to apply these unfamiliar technologies to practice also should be an important issue. Comparing with the string theory researchers, the scientists researching on kinetic property certainly seem more realistic. However, it is undeniable that both types of scientists all push our society to advance. / m8 `5 D8 t# u3 K+ m' P

5 _' l' n8 f, ?/ KIn sum, I believe that people should follow their ambitious dreams and goals, whether they are unrealistic or realistic. Time will prove that they deserve it.
老兄我觉得你的观点很好啊，只是小妹水平有限，，改错了不要见怪，不吝赐教啊~~

loveinwcUID: 3241878

2月29日 综合TPO18
The two materials are mainly analyzing the rationality of the three ways proposed by the reading passage about how to  preserve the torreya----the evergreen tree which is facing extinction.  So far, as I know, the lecture disproves the methods from reading one by one.
Firstly, the lecture rebuts the idea the reading says that replanting the torreya to its original place the north part of florida is a good option for its growth, by stating that, in fact, so far the climate in that place has been strongly affected by the global warming. plenty of rain there has been only a dream. For this reason, the original habitat is no longer fitted for the  torreya anymore.

Secondly, the reading asserts that there is another option for the torreya-----to move them to the totally different location where far from florida. This might sound good, because this way avoids the disadvantage emerging in the first one. However, the professor puts forth the idea that spreading of the torreya  too quickly will threaten the survival of other plants, especially some are facing extinction among them.

Lastly, to plant the torreya seeds in the research center might be a good idea. As the reading says, it will be easier to let scientists protect the population. But the lecturer disagrees this method that the limited area of the research will block the trees to grow more. When the torreya population needs bigger area to reproduce, the day will be not so far away when they leave.

idealibtUID: 2667256

喵星人.doc (43.5 KB, 下载次数: 5)

2012-3-1 20:44:50 上传

下载次数: 5

抱歉回复延迟。。。
最近实在是事情有点多，但一定会认真提交修改意见，请查阅附件，谢谢！

eileen73UID: 3256364

2.25已改

loveinwcUID: 3241878

三月一日 TPO19 综合

there is a marketing tactic named buzzing. however, it is controversial. the reading mainly talks about it disadvantages, while in the listening, the buzzer rebuts them by using his own experience.

firstly, the reading mentions that buzzers always does not tell the truth to consumers because they are paid by the related company.however, the lecturer argues that the viewpoint from the reading is totally a misleading. he says the  buzzer is those who really is  using  the product and think it is good, so the reviews from them are truth and that's why the company has hired him.

secondly,the reading  points out that most comments from buzzers are lack of criticism. their words are little substance and sounds like the boasting advertisement. the buzzer then opposes this view. he says the consumer who want to buy the product will ask a lot of questions, if he just provides the meaningless chitchat and does not answer them, they will not buy it.

finally, the reading skepticizes that some of the buzzers who have social status could mislead ignorant consumers to make wrong choice. but the buzzer disproves that in fact, if the product is not good enough, the company is not dare to employee buzzers. besides this, the consumer also could review their feelings by their own experience after using the product.

Frankie0616UID: 2763738

revised

loveinwcUID: 3241878

3月6日 101009NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People can take care of their family members better when they livein big cities than in the countryside.


To live in a city or to stay in the countryside, which choice would be better for our family members, can be measured in many ways. In this essay, I will focus on how can the environment influence individuals development. It will include education professional circumstance, and the public services. The statement is about hints at the traditional values of civility and the expectations of individuals. I fundamentally believe that with technology development, nowadays, living in big cities will be more helpful for people taking caring of their family members. In another words, why most of youngsters today prefer seeking jobs in big cities than enjoying peaceful life in countryside.

To begin with, it is true that the scenery and the air in the countryside seems better, while cities are always polluted. who expects the healthy life may think the countryside would be more suitable for their family members, but for the people in big cities, they could be provided more convenient public transportation to meet the needs of their family members. To exemplify what I mean, once the emergency happened, the transport in the cities could help people sent their family members to the hospital as soon as possible. In this way, the efficient advanced transport of cities could benefit citizens than the ones who live in the remote countryside. As a member of the family, we could use the spare time to do more meaningful things for our other family members. Then, the considerable time we saving also could be used to get along with family members and promote family emotion. Therefore, living in the big city not only could let family members enjoy the convenience of high technology, but also would better maintain the emotional ties of family members.

Secondly, let us analyze the individuals who face the choice of living in the cities or countryside. We must admit that all of us more or less have an innate desire to have an idyllic life after retired. This leads us to make effort to gain enough salary in order to have such life someday. However, cities could offer a competing environment to let the family members get better development in their careers.To my own opinion, all factors, whether they are high quality schooling education or more opportunities to positions in big companies, would contribute those in cities to be more easier accessible to their ambitions. A recent survey of 500 countryside family members found that 95.6% of the parents chose to go to the big cities in order to give their children the better educationTherefore, I believe that there are infinite possibilities in big cities waiting for the aspiring people.

In conclusion, one should stay in cities if they want to take care of their family members in order to give their families the better future. The every pace in human life should not be mediocre, though everyone would get the peace in the end. Furthermore, we should catch the opportunities to broaden our horizons as far as possible. Thus, I strongly agree with the statement that people can take care of their family members better when they living big cities than in the countryside.

eileen73UID: 3256364

昨天忘传了。。https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1336800-3-1.html

loveinwcUID: 3241878

3月7日 100619NA When people need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, some people prefer to use e-mail or text messaging, other like to use telephone or voice messaging. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your answer.

I believe that both telephone and e-mail are quite important ways for us to communicate with each other, but whether the writing like composing a message could be more useful than the oral statement to express upset or controversy is a debatable issue. It would appear that using e-mail could help people avoid embrassment when face to face with others. However, someone in delivering many expressions may feel that telephone is more suitable for them than writing long passages. That is the why so-called "burning the telephone line" can be a reasonable existence. In my opinion, using telephone to discuss upsetting or controversial problems is better than writing e-mail and text messaging.

The first reason that I would like to elaborate upon is that using telephone could help people save time. As we all know, the speed of transmitting sound is much higher than the speed of writing letters. It seems convenient we could tap something interesting or some jokes in a word or two through text messaging to let our friends know in our daily life. However, the same thing would not happen, when we met with some upsetting and controversial problems. For instance, I felt frustrated and upset when I sent out a series of text messages but just got messages flooded back asking me what had happened. Until I heard the voice from one of my friends , instantly, I felt a magic power to make me calm down. Thus, I believe that infectious voice could help people vent their emotion than poor writing. Except that, the one who is not a good writer is oppressed to write a piece of poorly organized explanation which should be clear in 2or 3 words orally, is another torture. So Rather than wasting time on keyboard, a direct telephone could be simpler to solve the problem.

It is a common sense that the Internet virus is still rampant. And the general idea of the virus creators is to send people some emails with worm or Trojan that as long as the users opens one of these emails, their personal information would be revealed. Against the email, the telephone seems less persecuted by these Internet viruses. Therefore, using telephone could be better than sending e-mails on protecting participants' privacy. According to a survey public research of internet security, 83% of participants would rather use telephone call than write an email to communicate private problems. Comparing with the system of free email website, people seem to think that the telephone companies are less possibility of being invaded by virus. On the other hand, some of the celebrities who sent their private photos though email finally resulted themselves into scandals.

To conclude, I believe that telephone call could assist people with exchanging their ideas which especially involved complex and controversial problems, in relative short time. In addition, this topic also requires people to focus on their privacy in some degree. Overall, telephone call has more advantages than email on communicating upsetting or controversial problems.

eileen73UID: 3256364

不好意思，改晚了。

xiesisiminervaUID: 2997765

不好意思改晚啦，sorry sorry

loveinwcUID: 3241878

3月8日独立：
猫屎咖啡加冰否(Bernice)   loveinwc(喵星人)     Amashine1

3月8日 100821NA Do you agree or disagree with the following

statement? We should never be impolite to another person.  

If someone told me he had never be impolite to others no mater what happens, I would think he maybe a saint. No anger no annoy, no impolite, it is even one of the highest states in our social moral principle. I don't know how to reach this, because in general angering means more or less losing control on expressing then possible would result in impolite behaviour. And even saint, might meet something he would feel angry. But i think if the meaning is just from the the saying itself, it is right. Sometimes i even think it just like the prospect Marx described in his social theory.

To begin with, anyway, polite attitude could help us to avoid many interpersonal problems. That's because polite words at first generally will make good impression to others. And then people who have this attitude always could deal with things smoothly. To exemplify what I mean, once I found there were something wrong with my final paper grade made by the staff because no one informed me that the related policy had been changed . I wanted to ask them why they did this, and to gave me a reasonable explanation. I tried my best to repress my anger and used most polite manner of speaking to treat them. Finally, I solve my problem smoothly. After that, one of my classmates told me some students from other classes also met the same problem, but because they used the impolite attitude to blame the staff during processing, unfortunately, got a bad influence on their final assessment. Thus, through something like these, I think, polite in some degree could help us to reduce the unnecessary troublesome.

On top of that, polite person usually looked better educated than the opposite ones. That might because impolite words sometimes might destroy the logical structure of the sentence someone may want to express and make the listeners to distort what they mean at beginning. Considering impolite behaviour or wording sometimes represents a unreasonable and emotional expression, I think this certainly will not benefit our development of social communication. There is a simple survey that might had been taken by most parents asking what they want their children to be showing that basically the options almost chosen by the parents included the one "polite " instead of "impolite". The result is normal. In my opinion, every parent wants their children to be polite and shows the best aspect to strangers.

In sum, although that's hard to say we could be polite to everyone everything whether the situation is suitable or not, I think we should try our best to keep our polite. As the old saying, maybe politeness could not solve every problem, but losing politeness loses more.

AmashineUID: 3267332

88# loveinwc


3月8日 100821NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We should never be impolite to another person.  


G) a4 Y' c
If someone told me he had never be impolite to others no mater what happens, I would think he maybe a saint. No anger no annoy, no impolite, it is even one of the highest states in our social moral principle. I don't know how to reach this, because in general angering means more or less losing control on expressing then possible(possibly) would result in impolite behaviours. And even saint, might meet something he would feel angry. But i think if the meaning is just from the the saying itself, it is right. Sometimes i even think it just like the prospect Marx described in his social theory.

i8 |2 S  e' v( V, g4 t0 \
To begin with, anyway, polite attitude could help us to avoid many interpersonal problems. That's because polite words at first generally will make good impression to others. And then people who have this attitude always could deal with things smoothly. To exemplify what I mean, once I found there were something wrong with my final paper grade made by the staff because no one informed me that the related policy had been changed . I wanted to ask them why they did this, and to gave me a reasonable explanation. I tried my best to repress my anger and used most polite manner of speaking to treat them. Finally, I solve my problem smoothly. After that, one of my classmates told me some students from other classes also met the same problem, but because they used the impolite attitude to blame the staff during processing, unfortunately, got a bad influence on their final assessment. Thus, through something like these, I think, polite in some degree could help us to reduce the unnecessary troublesome.

On top of that, polite person usually looked better educated than the opposite ones. That might because impolite words sometimes might destroy the logical structure of the sentence someone may want to express and make the listeners to distort what they mean at(in the,不确定) beginning. Considering impolite behaviour or wording sometimes represents a unreasonable and emotional expression, I think this certainly will not benefit our development of social communication. There is a simple survey that might had（have） been taken by most parents asking what they want their children to be showing that basically the options almost chosen by the parents included the one "polite " instead of "impolite". The result is normal. In my opinion, every parent wants their children to be polite and shows the best aspect to strangers.

f- y7 w9 i( l* Q
In sum, although that's hard to say we could be polite to everyone everything whether the situation is suitable or not, I think we should try our best to keep our polite. As the old saying, maybe politeness could not solve every problem, but losing politeness loses more.

写的很好，有意思