建议G作文分3.5或3.5+的同学写写自己的写作心得体会

小硕鼠UID: 3411565

适用于理工科有点小追求的同学- -
比如我那不堪入目的AW分数，二战不想栽了

terrylazioUID: 3034443

3.5随便写都有啊，只要按instruction，别用模板，扣着题目写，举些生活中的例子就好。

linger0527UID: 3368017

4分。准备了一个小时背了点argument模版然后就上场了。一篇也没练过题库也没看。托福作文还很低。总的感觉就是狗屎运！

IRIS凹UID: 3471287

还想问AW如何突破3.5呢，感觉这是个分水岭:(

心事付瑶琴UID: 2727285

不如发上一篇让大家诊断

vngogherUID: 3391684

注重分析一般都有4，写八股文一定是3或以下

小硕鼠UID: 3411565

terrylazio 发表于 2013-9-16 15:35
3.5随便写都有啊，只要按instruction，别用模板，扣着题目写，举些生活中的例子就好。

我就是老老实实instruction的。。。
应该是我逻辑性太差了--

小硕鼠UID: 3411565

心事付瑶琴 发表于 2013-9-16 15:51
不如发上一篇让大家诊断

嗯啊~我都不好意思发了。。。其实。。。

小硕鼠UID: 3411565

vngogher 发表于 2013-9-16 16:51
注重分析一般都有4，写八股文一定是3或以下

我后期完全扔掉模板了结果还这样- -
论坛真心缺少新G的AW经验贴

crazyrobinUID: 2368627

难道你是2.5???
写GRE作文美国高中生的写法就足以
Intro+ 3 examples + conclusion
4-5分
你连examples都没有，再fancy的逻辑也是一堆空话。
空话的下场就是2或者3

小硕鼠UID: 3411565

crazyrobin 发表于 2013-9-16 22:23
难道你是2.5???
写GRE作文美国高中生的写法就足以
Intro+ 3 examples + conclusion

我是3
例子绝对的有，instruction也认真看了，可能是太多chinglish的表达方法
而且很可能I跑题了……

crazyrobinUID: 2368627

小硕鼠 发表于 2013-9-16 22:24
我是3
例子绝对的有，instruction也认真看了，可能是太多chinglish的表达方法
而且很可能I跑题了……

Well maybe.
你不如发一篇看看。

心事付瑶琴UID: 2727285

小硕鼠 发表于 2013-9-16 22:20
嗯啊~我都不好意思发了。。。其实。。。

没事，这年头大神一般玩神隐，水论坛的一般都是和你差不多水平或者只好一点点的。谁也不会笑话谁，顶多就是第三世界的合作。。。

小硕鼠UID: 3411565

crazyrobin 发表于 2013-9-16 22:26
Well maybe.
你不如发一篇看看。

PP2的是否要培养leadership的题目
Leadership in a specific field is the bellwether that lead us to high-efficiency and to produce out high-quality work. In which way the leader performs, the outgrowth will varies in difference. Cooperation or competition, the long-standing view that can be discussed in which way should the leader cultivated, makes difference in the final outcoming of our group. I prefer the former way, say, cooperation makes perfect. I will discuss with the extent and confirm my idea with properly drawn supporting evidence and logical deduction.

Cooperation makes perfect, obviously, untold examples surrounding us confirm it. Why? One person's view, is most likely to be narrow and subjective, he only discuss a problem in his stereotypical way, besides, considering our human nature, it is quite common that we specifically ignore the idea that conflicts our own thoughts. We, indeed, tend to undermine them. In this situation I mentioned above, as a leader however, one should not settle down a problem that just based on his own opinion-- even if he would be willing to be "objective", there will be some flaws in his so-called "objective" thoughts, because he must on behalf of one side and try his best to comprehend the other side. This is sure to be inadequate to address a problem disinterestedly as a leader. But, surely, we need a leader that has a clear sense on the problem we ever faced, this need cooperation-- the leader discuss this problem with others, there is sure to be another voice, if he knows how to cooperate, he just assimilates another point of view, and reconciles different opinion toward one problem. He get together with others, solve problems together, and under this situation, it is hard  to turn this leader to be a dictator-- while this is the awful situation that we should avoid.

Admittedly,  the leader should compete with others in order to promote this group he lead. But to cultivate a leader in the way of teaching them how to cooperate does not means there exists a lack of competition in him. When he is told to cooperate with others,  he will find in what  way others performs better than him. Based on human nature, it is apparently that this leader will be willing to find out the key that how to performs better than others. This is surely to be competition education, but on the basis of cooperation.

In fact, usually, today we cannot achieve high goals just based on one leader performs as someone likes "dictator". For example, considering the competition named “defcon”, one of the competition used to evaluate a computer hacker's performance on network invade or defence. The rule of this competition is to run a given service station, and defend against other hacker's network attacking. Apparently, all of the participants are the top elites in their own field, but one could not run a service station just based on his own work-- the tremendous work cannot  be achieved by every single one's effort-- they need a group, they need cooperation, only in this way can they win the flag-- finally the champion.

Cooperation makes perfact. One leader should be told to know how to communicate with others, to know the different ideas, and to apply an objective strategy  to compete with others. Competition is not "teached", it forms naturally, based on cooperation education one leader received.

这是考前半个月写的作文，只改正了拼写错误（有10余处之多）
考前半个月主要把速度降下来，拼写正确率提升，尽量注意语法错误并且尽量充实例子
所以这基本上是我作文的真实水平
请轻拍……

小硕鼠UID: 3411565

心事付瑶琴 发表于 2013-9-16 22:27
没事，这年头大神一般玩神隐，水论坛的一般都是和你差不多水平或者只好一点点的。谁也不会笑话谁，顶多就 ...

已发。求轻拍 - -