請刪貼，謝謝

跳舞的摆摆UID：3504296

請刪貼，謝謝

wrathUID：2704440

才24岁。。。 你尴尬毛线。。。

Joyous15UID：3707659

我也24，现在看完你说的瞬间好尴尬……:mad:

caracccccUID：3686428

我27，还要去读本科，太尴尬了……

ybbhfjhhUID：3193481

才24岁。。。 你尴尬毛线。。。

教育专业对加拿大人来说都是不好找工作的专业，而且你的英语再好也达不到老师的标准，然后你又是英语老师...............
不换专业来加拿大靠找工作移民是走不通的，根本就不用试，浪费时间。
不算嫁人啥的基本上就两个办法，
下策是你可以赌ON的政策不改然后走研究生通道，风险太大，政策改了就得回国，运气好移民了还要考虑因为低收入导致的生活质量问题。
上策是换专业，重读本科，几乎没风险，花费稍高，收入高。

教育这个大火坑每年都无数人往里跳，又想移民又不听劝...聪明点去ON的还算好，来像SK这种不能直接移民的省，毕业全呵呵呵...来之前想好，别和他们学...

拿到身份以后你的教育背景倒是可以在加拿大活得还可以了，英语培训机构的雅思老师，学校小秘之类的工作努力+运气还是能找到的，只是收入不高没法维持想相中的北美中产生活

shiniao123UID：2561259

只有安省可以文科硕士无工作提名移民 但是要趁早 再过两年就不好说了
还有 才24岁。。。 你尴尬毛线。。。
我都快30了 我还计划明年去读本科呢

zihenwumingUID：3447227

才24岁。。。 你尴尬毛线。。。

路遥知UID：3697020

才24岁。。。 你尴尬毛线。。。

anranzhilvUID：3419123

搞得我都尴尬了……

Arthur M7UID：3486545

尴尬癌

alice725UID：3662470

ybbhfjhh 发表于 2016-4-20 23:09
才24岁。。。 你尴尬毛线。。。

教育专业对加拿大人来说都是不好找工作的专业，而且你的英语再好也达不到 ...

大神对我们这种跳火坑的后辈真是苦口婆心了……楼主才24，过两年有香港pr在手，工作瓶颈突破以后估计在香港也能过上中产生活，再遇上个对的人就妥妥的了。

happymiaomiaoUID：3357790

ybbhfjhh 发表于 2016-4-20 23:09
才24岁。。。 你尴尬毛线。。。

教育专业对加拿大人来说都是不好找工作的专业，而且你的英语再好也达不到 ...

（不针对楼主）其实真没必要劝人，因为每个人对火坑的理解是不一样的。。别人觉得不好了再劝，别人觉得还挺好的还劝反而会觉得干涉多，瞧不起某专业，等等。。尤其对于接受国内思想较多的女生来说压根没有打算靠自己工作过中产生活，真的是想多了

cheesechanUID：3505689

才24岁。。。 你尴尬毛线。。。
(P.S. what 毛线 means? :lol)

1. Do you think it is reasonable to find someone don't speak English as mother tongue to teach English in a English speaking country like Canada?
It is possible to do so in HK since there are not that much people speak English as mother tongue, and thus experience of learning English as a second language is useful. But still, they are hiring English teacher that speak English as mother tongue oversea for this purpose. imagine the case that in Canada.

2. 6.5 is a very weak signal for those whose main discipline is related to English be honest, even you don't have any preparation.
For sure English teaching is different from English exam, but people still expect you to have way higher English skills than average. 6.5 is even below the average of all university student in HK (including all 8 university and all major)

3. GRE will help a bit, but really only a bit.

4. Policy is........something no one knows. But if you want to know how high the risk is, a good method is to do some fundamental analysis. A most important question is: what is the basis for the existence of such policy? If there is a reason (e.g. econ need, shortage occupation, etc...), then things are safe. If something is far from the need of soceity, then it is at high risk.

5. Education is not only about the teaching and English skill, but is also a kind of inherite of ideology. Why a well developed country with a much more open mind soceity are going to hire something from a developing world with completely different education and value?

6. When compared to science student, art students are way more difficult to stay oversea based on their major and job even they are equally good, because:
I/ cultural difference counts less in an science and engineering job.
II/ the supply of STEM student is not enough for basically all developed countries.

cheesechanUID：3505689

happymiaomiao 发表于 2016-4-21 14:42
（不针对楼主）其实真没必要劝人，因为每个人对火坑的理解是不一样的。。别人觉得不好了再劝，别人觉得还挺好的还劝反而会觉得干涉多，瞧不起某专业，等等。。尤其对于接受国内思想较多的女生来说压根没有打算靠自己工作过中产生活，真的是想多了

(More than before) Equal right between the two gender is based on the (more than before) equal income among them, in addition to (if not instead of) any justified social science theory.

It is not a problem that "接受国内思想较多的女生来说压根没有打算靠自己工作过中产生活", but at the same time they cannot expect to be treated as equally when compared with others.
since it is much easier to have 3rd party involved into a marriage relationship when the couples are in completely two different social class (what I mean here is class, but not income)