- 最后登录
- 2008-10-31
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 152
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-11
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 93
- UID
- 2115607
![Rank: 2](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level2.gif)
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 152
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-11
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
issue83 "Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
With the high development of the democratic society, contemporary, it is the government’s responsibility to preserve the public wilderness areas in natural state. The public resources owned by multitudes so as the government, whose duty is to protect people’s legal rights and supervise them to finish their obligation, even to help manage and preserve the publicly own areas.
Fundamentally, I think the wilderness area in natural state may play a significant role in balancing the local climet and accomodating the weather. The current climetic situation was formed steady long time ago, these kinds of wilderness areas have participated in the great exchange of the climet and become an important member now. So it is unwisdom to change it as well as the whole condition in this area. Let’s take the global climet for example, we, humanbeings always consider the south Americna tropical rain forest as lung of the world, it may be the best tool to repair the ozone shield and halt the greenhouse effect. However some modern businessmen pay too much attention on the profit but no noticing on the whole issue and the benefits belonging to the next generations at all. These wilderness areas in their natual state must do the almost same profomance like as the tropical rain forest of the earth.
What’s more, in the case that the wilderness areas keep their natural states, there must exist plenty of species in them, they have formed a biosphere which do great influnence on the local species. Moreover, if there inhabited some species which is nearly in extincting or dying out, governments’ protection seem to be more necessary. On the worldwild background of preserving the organism being in severe danger, it becomes severely for every nation to advocate protecting them, scientists are researching on the gene engineering to seek for the best methold to keep the species or recreate them. So it is also the obligation for governments to preserve these aeras.
As I mentioned above, it is naturally for government to pick up this burden to protect the areas to benefit both the current people and the next generations, which should not block these steps even they are extremely faraway or accessible for most public. Nevertheless, as Lincoln’s speech shown that: government of the people, for the people, and by the people. It will do harm to the stabilization of the society If the government can not meet the crowd’s requirement. For instance, in the Qing dynasty, the feudalization caused the Taiping Rebellion though ended up with failure ultimately. Thus government should solve these problems, we can establish or cultivate some other fields to set up some new careers or business and entertain the people.
In sammary, it is not only governments’ rights but also the responsibility to preserve the wilerness aeras and keep them in their natural states, no matter how far they are or how few people can touch them, it is the whole world’s theme to protect the wilderness so as to preserve the biosphere and balance the climets of it.
. |
|