Argument109 【0706G－LOVEAW】 by iq28 0706G同主题写作第八期

speaklessUID: 2205899

变态题啊......
我抓不到重点...
写了23MIN就写完了...
只写了370字....
彻底speakless

IloveissuetooUID: 2323606

我也写过..
333字还35min..
啊

speaklessUID: 2205899

QQBB这题咋搞...我想半天弄出来三条分论点,结果还深挖不下去
1)PC价格上升不代表是RULE没作用.比如说PC的居民不愿意买新房,或者通货膨胀- -!
2)CC没有采用RULE价格上升更不能说明RULE没作用.这个真不知道改怎么展开...只好随便干凑了几句...说什么如果采取措施可能....没有采取不能代表它没有作用什么什么.....晕
3)然后说MC不一定使用PC或者CC的情况.......比如说MC更愿意买新房,这样RULE的作用会很明显.....
然后就没了...没什么思路可以展开了.....
PS:MS和你的思路差不多.....

[ 本帖最后由 speakless 于 2007-4-16 17:59 编辑 ]

ILOVEISSUEUID: 2300195

转一篇我们校aw6分牛人的作文，大家参考参考

The author's notion that laws that limit new building construction will have
no effect on average housing prices in the city of Maple City is plausible.
After all, the author has provided several evidences to justify his claim.
However, the statement is not so convincing because of the existence of
logical defects.

First of all, the comparison made between the two cities, Chestnut City and
Pine City, is of little meaning since there may exist lots of differences
between them. The housing prices are affected by various factors such as the
total demand of houses, the average prices of lands, and the total number of
houses built. The average housing prices in Chestnut City, which doesn't
possess laws limiting new construction of houses, experienced a similar
increase with Pine City. It is may because that although Chestnut City is about
the same size as Pine City, it possesses a large population, and
consequently people need more houses than people in Pine City. Pine City,
with less houses needed, is affected less by the limiting new construction
than the Chestnut City would be if the latter established a similar law.
Furthermore, it's entirely possible that the houses constructors in Chestnut
City have been more responsible and careful people, and they may established
an industry ordinance to limit the new constructions since the
over-construction of new houses will bring wastes and harm the entire
market. Therefore, although the government of Chestnut City hasn't enacted
such laws, the new houses construction in Chestnut City is kept at a
relatively low level. The similarity in the increasing may also be explained
by the land prices of the different cities. If the land prices in Chestnut
City have gone up during the last twenty years while the land prices in Pine
City have gone down, it's no surprising to see the superficial fact that the
increasing of houses price are similar in two cities regardless of the laws.
To sum, the comparison made can't convince us that the laws truly have no
effect on average housing prices.

Even if one accepts that the laws really do little with the houses prices in
Chestnut City and Pine City during the last twenty years, the argument above
is also questionable in other ways. The author didn't provide us any
information about Maple City. The situation in Maple City may be so
different with Chestnut City or Pine City that even the laws have influenced
little on the houses prices in those two cities, one can't generalize that
the similar laws will not influence the Maple City. Moreover, twenty years
have passed, and things have changed so much that we cannot predict that the
laws will behave in the same way as they did in the last twenty years. It's
largely possible that, although the laws limiting the new constructions
didn't affect the houses prices during the last twenty years, they will
greatly affect the prices in the near future due to the possible surge in
the need of new houses or other facts.

As it stands, the author's contention, while it seems logical at first,
lacks credibility because the author fails to support it with strong
argument. To make his notion more persuasive, the author has to give us more
detailed information about the situations in the three cities discussed, and
provide us a full understanding about the effects the limiting laws will
play. If we blindly establish the similar laws in Maple City, the life of
citizens in Maple City will most probably be largely affected by the
carelessness of the governor.

pippo1983UID: 172110

是6分nr的习作还是这篇得了6分？

ILOVEISSUEUID: 2300195

6分nr的习作

ILOVEISSUEUID: 2300195

不过写得的确挺牛的

pippo1983UID: 172110

不用担心，你的a估计也是6;d: ;d:

majicdayUID: 2228484

拜读大家高见，佩服啊