Argument17: The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Walnut Grove town newspaper.
'Walnut Grove's town council has advocated switching from EZ Disposal (which has had the contract for trash collection services in Walnut Grove for the past ten years) to ABC Waste, because EZ recently raised its monthly fee from $2,000 to $2,500 a month, whereas ABC's fee is still $2,000. But the town council is mistaken; we should continue using EZ. EZ collects trash twice a week, while ABC collects only once. Moreover, EZ—which, like ABC, currently has a fleet of 20 trucks—has ordered additional trucks. Finally, EZ provides exceptional service: 80 percent of respondents to last year's town survey agreed that they were 'satisfied' with EZ's performance.'
攻击的3段内容是:
1。 the arguer fails to provide necessary and confident evidence about whether the residents of Walnut Grove care more about the frequency of the trash collection than the amount of money they paid
2。the fact that EZ has ordered additional trucks tells us little about EZ’s performance
3。the argument depends on a survey that 80 percent of respondents to last year’s town survey agreed that they were ‘satisfied’ with EZ’s performance.
这个文章的逻辑链是什么???
我同学,说的很简单
结论:we should continue using EZ
证据1:EZ collects trash twice a week, while ABC collects only once
证据2:EZ—which, like ABC, currently has a fleet of 20 trucks—has ordered additional trucks
证据3:80 percent of respondents to last year's town survey agreed that they were 'satisfied' with EZ's performance.
那怎么找?我的方法就是顺着逻辑链,顺藤摸瓜
这个地方我再贴下文章原文
'Walnut Grove's town council has advocated switching from EZ Disposal (which has had the contract for trash collection services in Walnut Grove for the past ten years) to ABC Waste, because EZ recently raised its monthly fee from $2,000 to $2,500 a month, whereas ABC's fee is still $2,000. But the town council is mistaken; we should continue using EZ. EZ collects trash twice a week, while ABC collects only once. Moreover, EZ—which, like ABC, currently has a fleet of 20 trucks—has ordered additional trucks. Finally, EZ provides exceptional service: 80 percent of respondents to last year's town survey agreed that they were 'satisfied' with EZ's performance.'
首先有一点是非常明确的
文章的结论是:But the town council is mistaken; we should continue using EZ.
结论后面的3个证据是很明显的。但是正如我上个文章所说,关键不是看出来这个是证据,而是看出来,它们是谁的证据!!! https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D100
接着就是前面一大块。