- 最后登录
- 2011-7-7
- 在线时间
- 47 小时
- 寄托币
- 124
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2010-12-16
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 111
- UID
- 2976843
![Rank: 2](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level2.gif)
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 124
- 注册时间
- 2010-12-16
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
本帖最后由 zahngxin 于 2011-6-1 19:53 编辑
06,01 2011
2009 年11 月07 日北美
For successful development of a country, should a government focus its budget more on very young children education rather than on universities?(534)
Among hundreds and thousands kinds of factors to inspire a country in a high speed development steps, education can never be exaggerated to be regarded as a fatal/vital/crucial factor for the successful, efficient, and effective development to a country. In recent decades, almost all countries begin increasing their budget on education, especially in China and India. However, arbitrarily to say that that government should allocate more money on the primary education,like the very young children education, than that of higher education is not wise, with the following reasons.
It is no deny that primary education to the very young children pay an crucial role in the development in economy, military, national defence, social instruction etc. But it is higher education, like university, that directly cultivate those young people, and then give a push driver to country civilization and social improvement. For example, can you have a possibility to avoid hearing some news about high techniques without any participation of young people, who even just graduate from university several years ago, mostly involving in manufacturing hi-tech machines. In order to instruct the young people, we need to pay a considerable large number of money to buy instruction equipment, and establish laboratories for them doing experiences. While, in elementary education, we will no be in a essential situation to buy some special instruction equipment or build some buildings.
Also, the primary education, even formative education, is the basis of the development, as countless people have ever said that "Education is the basis of a project of vital and lasting importance " . Although most people conform to it, it does not means that we must put more money in the education budget than the money spent on the university education. And what is most important is that we need to spend money on organizing forums, proseminars, visitatorial activities for our young people, improving lots of opportunities for them to gain experiences which will be helpful for their maturation. As we all know that very young children have little experience to do decision, control themselves when they encounter some dilemmas. So the main measure we use to cultivate our children is to put more energy on them other than more money. For example, one of my classmates named xiao li, who has a wealthy family and always has a large number of money, can buy almost everything if he want to do. As his farther think that money is the most important,and good thing inspire his son to study hard, however, he ignore that it is the attentions he put on his son, but not money can bring him a excellent son. So, when we talk about "how a country can educate her children to be outstanding ones?" our answer are putting more energy on them and instructing them cannily.
In a nutshell, as I am concerned that the government should admeasure more money in education budget to higher education like university education. As what I have discussed that we young people need more money to get a better environment to study, and then give a better service to the country's development, while the very young children just need more social energy or attention to cultivate them. |
|