麦子的作文作业 & 20天冲刺日记

heqiang_1001UID: 2607349

11月3日
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Government should pay more attention on health care issues than on environmental issues?
提纲：
taking action to protect our enviroment is an urgent issue. No matter how much high the level of health care level, health problems couldn’t be solved compeletely if people lived in a over-polluted environment.
Once it had been polluted, it is much difficult even impossible to convert it to its originnal condition.
The improvement of enviromental issues could bring benefits to the social health care.
分割线

Nowadays,people's living standard has been largely increased. Thus they pay more and more attention on health care issues such as health insurance, medical services to improve their states of health. However, whether should government pay more attention on health care issues than on environmental issues? As for me, I firmly disagree with such statement with following substantial aspects.

To begin with, Protecting our environment is such an urgent issue that government should pay much attention to. Because, no matter how much high the level of health care is,  people couldn't be healthy all their life if they lived in an over-polluted world. The disaster of Chernobly, occurred in the former Soviet Union, gives us an example of how serious the nuclear pollution is. There is no denying that advanced drugs , best treatment as well as scientific management of health care couldn't guarantee citizens' physical well-beings who live near that area.

Moreover, we could not ignore the fact that many environmental pollution is an irreversible process. Due to a long time formation of our ecology balance, it is very difficult even impossible to convert our environment to its original condition. Considering the decreased tropical forests, detrimental acid rains and ice-berg melting in Arctic, all of these may be avoided if we human pay much attention to our environmental issues decades years ago. While, the level of health care could be improved at a relatively rapid speed with the investment of money and instruments.

Finally, the improvement of environmental issues could bring benefits to health care issues. Living with clean water and fresh air, people could enhance their immune system and improve their physical fitnesses, which is a success that our health care should achieve. For example,In 1972, the Clean Water Act begin the job of restoring America's waterways, which goal is to improve quality of its waters. And it did work. The dates show that since the enactment of the Clean Water Act, the number of patients in hospital decreased rapidly during its first fifteen years.

To sum up, taking all the factors mentioned above, we may safely dram the conclusion that it is not wise to pay less attention to environmental issues. Only by taking action to protect our environment, can we avoid much more serious pollution in this world. Under this circumstance, we could focusing on our health care issues and make people live a better life.

补充：
类似题目Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important things for governments to improve health care are to clean the environment.

The defenition of health care: The prevention, treatment, and management of illness and the preservation of mental and physical well-being through the services offered by the medical and allied health professions.

感谢修改的同学。我快考试了，发现有些话题的文章还没有写过，所以今天没有按照作业布置的题目写，是自己找的题目。也还是请修改的同学帮我看看这篇作文，我也会认真帮你点评的。再次感谢！

heqiang_1001UID: 2607349

综合作文  practice 1The reading passage contends that summer drought contributed the disappearance of  Anasazi. While the professor's lecture casts several doubts on the point stated in the passage.

To begin with , in contrast to the argument stated in the reading that a sixty-year summer drought lead to  Anasazi migration, the reading passage the professor claims that the summer drought affected different places at time. There is no evidence that the drought had definitely occurred at area where Anasazi live. Moreover, trees which were not dead and existed for thousands years had been found at that area.
(the subsequent drought through out the world affected different places, the global warming didn't affect ……… Tree--> Chanco Canyon    )

Moreover,the lecture opposes the point in the reading that the irrigation systems indicates their water shortage. The listening supports that the irrigation systems which had been discovered shows that  Anasazi has ability to store water to defend the drought. And some stored crops had also been found so that their food supply couldn'be vanished at summer drought.
(they are fully aware of their problems of   water shortages and develop technology to store water and divert it to grow corn, squash, beans in desert-like land )

The concept in the reading passage that  Anasazi's subsequent food shortages result in their migration or disappearance is just a hypotheses. The lecture maintains a different point of vies, the professor hold an argue that it may other disaster which attack Anasazi such as disease or overuse of farm land. (The drought isn't so severe that make them abandon their nation )  

To sum up, the contents in the listening are totally different toward what stated in the reading passage.

字数220

蓝字是我自己后来又看文本抄上的原文。谢谢修改的同学。这篇写残了，时间刚刚够，还只憋了220个字。

heqiang_1001UID: 2607349

今天整体状态还可以。
上午上课做了一篇老美范文的翻译。
下午写独立作文，综合作文各一篇。整理了独立作文的分类题库。其实下午效率还是蛮低的，磨磨蹭蹭时间就过去了。
晚上，黄金做了3篇，基本上还是平均2~3个的样子，明明觉得文章比以前看懂了很多，做题还是会错……
巴郎做了一套听力，51错15……还是有点多。哎。而且……听的云里雾里的文科段子反而错的少，感觉听的很明白的一个理科段子竟然错了4个，哎。听力啊……给点面子吧，练了这么久了……
以及口语作业

赶紧睡觉去了，明天要早起的。发现问题了，其实我每天都是用了差不多一天的时间，只是做了一套完整的考试题，至多加了分析……这个效率，哎！啥也不说了，明天继续加油！

HYPS2011UID: 2618437

  The reading passage contends that summer drought contributed the disappearance of  Anasazi. While the professor's lecture casts several doubts on the points stated in the passage.

To begin with , in contrast to the argument stated in the reading that a sixty-year summer drought leads to  Anasazi migration, the reading passage (choose one between reading and professor )the professor claims that the summer drought affected different places at that time. There is no evidence shows that the drought had definitely occurred at area where Anasazi lived. Moreover, trees which were not dead and existed for thousands years had been found at that area.

(the subsequent drought through out the world affected different places, the global warming didn't affect ……… Tree--> Chanco Canyon    )

Moreover,the lecture opposes the point in the reading that the irrigation systems indicates their water shortage. The listening supports that the irrigation systems which had been discovered shows that  Anasazi has ability were able to to store water to defend the drought. And some stored crops had also been found so that their food supply couldn'be vanished at summer drought.
(they are fully aware of their problems of   water shortages and develop technology to store water and divert it to grow corn, squash, beans in desert-like land )

The concept in the reading passage that  Anasazi's subsequent food shortages results in their migration or disappearance is just a hypotheses. The lecture maintains a different point of vies, the professor holds an arguement that(there may be some other disasters that compell Anasazi to leave) it may other disasters which attack Anasazi such as disease or overuse of farm land. (The drought isn't so severe that make them abandon their nation )  

To sum up, the contents in the listening are totally different toward what stated in the reading passage


听力都听到了，句子时态处理上一定要注意 而且好像好比较多。所以下次写的时候 一定要注意。看到你的备考日记 真的很振奋。 惭愧不已阿！加油！  我 相信 麦子 ！

scutgongUID: 2564275

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Government should pay more attention on health care issues than on environmental issues?1 M4 L1 K$ P" y$ t0 B5 H

Nowadays, people's living standard has been largely increased. Thus they pay more and more attention on health care issues such as health insurance, medical services to improve their states of health. However, whether should government pay more attention on health care issues than on environmental issues? As for me, I firmly disagree with such statement with following substantial aspects.

To begin with, protecting our environment is such an urgent issue that government should pay much attention to. Because, no matter how much (much 可以删掉吧)high the level of health care is,  people couldn't be healthy all their life if they lived in an over-polluted world. The disaster of Chernobyl, occurred in the former Soviet Union, gives us an example of how serious the nuclear pollution is. There is no denying that advanced drugs , best (best 可以换一个和advanced等能并列的词语来替代) treatment as well as scientific management of health care couldn't guarantee citizens' physical well-beings who live near that area.
' A( m5 W6 l+ j
Moreover, we could not ignore the fact that many environmental pollution is an irreversible process. Due to a long time formation of our ecology balance, it is very difficult even impossible to convert our environment to its original condition. Considering the decreased tropical forests, detrimental acid rains and ice-berg melting in Arctic, all of these may be avoided if we human pay much attention to our environmental issues decades years ago. While, the level of health care could be improved at a relatively rapid speed with the investment of money and instruments.

Finally, the improvement of environmental issues could bring benefits to health care issues. Living with clean water and fresh air, people could enhance their immune system and improve their physical fitness, which is a success that our health care should achieve. For example, In 1972, the Clean Water Act begin the job of restoring America's waterways, which goal is to improve quality of its waters. And it did work. The dates show that since the enactment of the Clean Water Act, the number of patients in hospital decreased rapidly during its first fifteen years. : a0 P% Z7 Z% H5 f; l

To sum up, taking all the factors mentioned above, we may safely draw the conclusion that it is not wise to pay less attention to environmental issues. Only by taking action to protect our environment, can we avoid much more serious pollution in this world. Under this circumstance, we could focusing on our health care issues and make people live a better life.

说实话，写的很好的，我看了好几遍，试图挑点毛病，但是感觉很难。不错啊。继续加油，向你学习！

daisy840228UID: 2684617

The reading passage contends that summer drought contributed the disappearance of  Anasazi. While the professor's lecture casts several doubts on the points stated in the passage.
1 B0 B$ w) n* @4 F2 z) a" V2 S4 K0 g$ O
To begin with , in contrast to the argument stated in the reading that a sixty-year summer drought leads to  Anasazi migration, the reading passage (choose one between reading and professor )the professor claims that the summer drought affected different places at that time. There is no evidence shows that the drought had definitely occurred at area where Anasazi lived. Moreover, trees which were not dead and existed for thousands years had been found at that area.9 n2 D0 r- _" h  V

7 u" f- c6 K8 x4 e( ^3 Y(the subsequent drought through out the world affected different places, the global warming didn't affect ……… Tree--> Chanco Canyon    )6 z# l2 A0 g! U2 _; j2 n

  O6 O: Q# g( K1 QMoreover,the lecture opposes the point in the reading that the irrigation systems indicates their water shortage. The listening supports that the irrigation systems which had been discovered shows that  Anasazi has ability were able to to store water to defend the drought. And some stored crops had also been found so that their food supply couldn'be vanished at summer drought.. \1 o5 h& _8 f$ K+ N6 x: w. L1 H& u+ X
(they are fully aware of their problems of   water shortages and develop technology to store water and divert it to grow corn, squash, beans in desert-like land )/ P9 Q; |2 k! B) g
6 B, b2 F% o. p3 L6 H- i
The concept in the reading passage that  Anasazi's subsequent food shortages results in their migration or disappearance is just a hypotheses. The lecture maintains a different point of vies, the professor holds an arguement that(there may be some other disasters that compell Anasazi to leave) it may haveother disasters which attack Anasazi such as disease or overuse of farm land. (The drought isn't so severe that make them abandon their nation )  
2 ?, `# F6 s" B, l/ ~+ w8 x' j' I/ _/ f: G$ v
To sum up, the contents in the listening are totally different toward what stated in the reading passage  q: P5 s7 c0 w+ \3 ^8 G$ u
% M& g/ u/ O7 v, G# h5 c
% R9 w) L7 m+ |4 n1 A3 n! |
听力都听到了，句子时态处理上一定要注意 而且好像好比较多。所以下次写的时候 一定要注意。看到你的备考日记 真的很振奋。 惭愧不已阿！加油！  我 相信 麦子 ！

同意以上同学观点，听得比我听到的多啊。一起加油

heqiang_1001UID: 2607349

11月5日 综合写作 practice4
The reading passage contends that it is a "swamp gas" explosion that leads to the Tunguska explosion instead of an asteroid. The professor's lecture casts doubts on the reading by several points.

First of all, in contrast to the argument stated in the reading passage that there are neither traces nor fragments which had been found in Tunguska area, the professor holds the view that this lack could demonstrate that asteroid had happened. It is after 19 years that scientists went to Tunguska to find evidence. While in 2001 Canada explosion, scientist rushed to the place in 2 weeks. The evidence of traces or fragments may be disappear by the force of nature.  
(Comet particles)

Moreover, the lecture opposes to the point made in  the reading that the lack of impact crater may indicate that the asteroid theory are in doubt , The professor claims that the ground are low before the asteroid happened. The pressure makes contribution to the space explored so that there are not huge craters.

Furthermore, the lecture maintains a different point of view. The professor indicates that if the "swamp gas" or other methane gas that lead to Tunguska explosion as what the reading urge, we couldn't account the number of tree at that place. For there shouldn't be any single tree alive, It may have evidence about the absence and disappearances of trees.      
=======================================

第二段原文 ：The asteroid did not have to crash into the Earth as an intact rock. When an asteroid or comet enters the Earth, it could explore in the lower atmosphere before hitting the ground. Under rapid heat and pressure, the space rock slammimg into the Earth could have explored into a huge fireball over Tunguska  

IF ^^^^gas^^^, The huge fireball would concentrate on one spot
The traces of Tunguska has a epicenter of destruction

呃………要是考试写成这篇这样应该limited了。后两个观点完全没听懂，再瞎扯……

heqiang_1001UID: 2607349

11.5    独立作文
Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher . Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer ? Use the specific reasons and details to support your answer.

History is replete with the examples of people who achieve their success through their self-studies. So which is better, to study by our own or to learn with a teacher? When it comes to me, I firmly agree with the statement that leaning with a teacher brings us a lot of benefits with substantial aspects.

To begin with, It is teacher's specific knowledge and great teaching skills that help us to learn how to study step by step. On the one hand, it is necessary for us to be guided with a experienced teacher to form a proper learning ability and right attitude toward study. Both of these should be developed when we are only small children.(少写长句) Especially in the field of natural science, students rarely have(own) ability to learn how to curriculum(calculate) or grasp some basic principles. On the other hand, teachers are those who have abundant experiences in teaching. So they are familiar with problems or troubles students may come to. Through clear analysis and deeply explaining, we could understand these new knowledge more effectively and efficiently.  

In addition, educational psychology are one of the core curriculums for students who plan to do the job as a teacher. Thus they are more professional to help students to develop a healthy and positive psychology compared to their own parents. Take a personal experience as an example. For I wasn't a sweet girl when I was a child, the stage for dance or chorus was far away from my world. As an ugly duckling in my school, I never knew what I could do except to study hard. While my teacher once took me to her office, and told me that my composition is so excellent that a lot of teachers took it as a model essay. It's my teacher who brought sunshine to my life and help me to build my confidence through discovering my particular merits.

Admittedly, numerous though advantages that learning with a teacher enjoys are, we could not forget the fact that teacher may bring their own negative emotion to the class. Under this circumstance, the quality of study may be decreased. In addition, there are also some teachers who show their own political or social views in class. It may influence students' attitudes or ideas of their own about some world events.

To sum up, considering all the factors mentioned above, we may safely draw the conclusion that learning with a teacher could help us to study more effectively and build a positive psychology. Students should cherish their precious time when they could be taught by teachers.After we graduate from school, we should learn by ourselves from social experiences or even mistakes.

中间有一点是我自己看了改的。感谢修改的同学。

heqiang_1001UID: 2607349

今天很神奇，腾讯ＴＴ的速度这么快……呵呵。
汇报今天的任务：
阅读：黄金29篇 3篇。第二遍还做这么慢，明天要加快速度，争取能完成5篇。要不考试之前都过不完了。
听力：巴郎精听了5个lecture。发现反应不过来的地方：1、阅读认识的词但是听力没有建立反应的词2、完全生词。
单词：上午背了词义累记50页，晚上背了20页，还有30页，一会儿去背完然后睡觉。争取考试前词义类记能过两遍。
口语：1、2段子若干…………呃，为啥我这么不愿意练口语呢。一会儿把昨天真经的后4题做了再上床好了。
作文：综合+独立 各一篇。

明天早上起来，查一些例子。今天独立想写赖斯的例子，结果发现，光知道事例，英文表达完全不会，估计要是自己翻译也会很生硬的。作文现在的问题：1、拼写，打错的很多，想不起来的基本词汇很多。2、打字速度。3、例子，还不能熟练运用，而且感觉有点少，很多话题的例子还没有准备。

时间不多了，不太敢想结果……有点恐怖。再最后努力一个星期。加油了。

ice--breakerUID: 2717367

咋一看 好强啊 字数达到534 半个小时写这么多，太拽了！
Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher . Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer ? Use the specific reasons and details to support your answer.- F* P! g1 E+ g* l5 _

is replete with the examples of people who achieve their success through their self-studies. So which is better, to study by our own or to learn with a teacher? When it comes to me, I firmly agree with the statement that leaning with a teacher brings us
（with）a lot of benefits with（in） substantial aspects.$ |7 A  }* Y+ I& `" a: g
) U# w( [1 N( m/ x1 \  P- c
To begin with, It is teacher's specific knowledge and great teaching skills that help us to learn how to study step by step. On the one hand, it is necessary for us to be guided with a experienced teacher to form a proper learning ability and right attitude toward study. Both of these should be developed when we are only small children.(少写长句) Especially in the field of natural science, students rarely have(own) ability to learn how to curriculum(calculate) or grasp some basic principles. On the other hand, teachers are those who have abundant experiences in teaching. So they are familiar with problems or troubles students may come to. Through clear analysis and deeply explaining, we could understand these new knowledge more effectively and efficiently.  : i9 }; ]  q6 ~- W
; b8 @, P& Z5 _6 D9 l5 g
In addition, educational psychology are one of the core curriculums for students who plan to do the job as a teacher. Thus they are more professional to help students to develop a healthy and positive psychology compared to their own parents. Take a personal experience as an example. For（这个可以加句子吗？） I wasn't a sweet girl when I was a child, the stage for dance or chorus was far away from my world. As an ugly duckling in my school, I never knew what I could do except to study hard. While my teacher once took me to her office, and told me that my composition is so excellent that a lot of teachers took it as a model essay. It's my teacher who brought sunshine to my life and help me to build my confidence through discovering my particular merits.
Admittedly, numerous though advantages that learning with a teacher enjoys are, we could not forget the fact that teacher may bring their own negative emotion to the class. Under this circumstance, the quality of study may be decreased. In addition, there are also some teachers who show their own political or social views in class. It may influence students' attitudes or ideas of their own about some world events.（这段为什么要写呢？？？？）
sum up, considering all the factors mentioned above, we may safely draw the conclusion that learning with a teacher could help us to study more effectively and build a positive psychology. Students should cherish their precious time when they could be taught by teachers.After we graduate from school, we should learn by ourselves from social experiences or even mistakes
总结：文章结构清晰，用语准确，没有什么语法错误，我不知道第三个反面是不是不应该提呢，还是提了比较好，你教下我吧，高手啊！
53# heqiang_1001

wallopUID: 2310651

你这个虽然时间很长，但大部分是用来学习英语的，不是用来考iBT，等你报分吧

HYPS2011UID: 2618437

Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher . Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer ? Use the specific reasons and details to support your answer.

History is replete with the examples of people who achieve their success through their self-studies. So which is better, to study by our own or to learn with a teacher? When it comes to me, I firmly agree with the statement that leaning with a teacher brings us a lot of benefits with substantial aspects.

To begin with, It is teacher's specific knowledge and great teaching skills that help us to learn how to study step by step. On the one hand, it is necessary for us to be guided with a experienced teacher to form a proper learning ability and right attitude towards study. Both of these should be developed when we are (at very early age) only small children.(少写长句) Especially in the field of natural science, students rarely have(own) ability to learn how to curriculum(calculate) or grasp some basic principles. On the other hand, teachers are those who have abundant experiences in teaching. So they are familiar with problems or troubles students may come to. Through clear analysis and deeply explaining, we could understand these new knowledge more effectively and efficiently.  

In addition, educational psychology are one of the core curriculums for students who plan to do the job as a teacher. Thus they are more professional to help students to develop a healthy and positive psychology compared to their own parents. Take a personal experience as an example. For I wasn't a sweet girl when I was a child, the stage for dance or chorus was far away from my world. As an ugly duckling in my school, I never knew what I could do excepts to study hard. While my teacher once took me to her office, and told me that my composition is(was) so excellent that a lot of teachers took it as a model essay. It's my teacher who brought sunshine to my life and helped me to build my confidence through discovering my particular merits.


Admittedly, (though  顺序) numerous though advantages that learning with a teacher enjoys （删去）are, we could not forget the fact that teacher may bring their own negative emotion to the class. Under this circumstance, the quality of study may be decreased. In addition, there are also some teachers who show their own political or social views in class. It may influence students' attitudes or ideas of their own about some world events。这段不错哈

To sum up, considering all the factors mentioned above, we may safely draw the conclusion that learning with a teacher could help us to study more effectively and build a positive psychology. Students should cherish their precious time when they could be taught by teachers.After we graduate from school, we should （can only ）learn by ourselves from social experiences or even mistakes.

写得不错哈

selwynUID: 2722431

新手上路,回复看看

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

H11月5日 综合写作 practice4
The reading passage contends that it is a "swamp gas" explosion that leads to the Tunguska explosion instead of an asteroid. The professor's lecture casts doubts on the reading by several points.

H
First of all, in contrast to the argument stated in the reading passage that there are neither traces nor fragments which had been found in Tunguska area, the professor holds the view that this lack could demonstrate that asteroid had happened. It is after 19 years that scientists went to Tunguska to find evidence. While in 2001 Canada explosion, scientist rushed to the place in 2 weeks. The evidence of traces or fragments may be disappear by the force of nature. 我这里的年数都米有记~~考试这样直接就废了~~555555:dizzy:    m  X1 t1 {$ f5 i: b/ _2 ?4 l
(Comet particles)0 `1 H3 H, o7 t2 H' d

Moreover, the lecture opposes to the point made in  the reading that the lack of impact crater may indicate that the asteroid theory are in doubt , The professor claims that the ground are low before the asteroid happened（应该是impact happened吧。这个写的好绕人哇）. The pressure makes contribution to the space explored so that there are not huge craters.lecture里应该将的是那个impact在空中就发生了。然后就米有挨着地面啊，那些asteroid在空中因为压力和heat就米有了吧~~

3 i
/ X" i7 w' c$ ?$ x1 _- @
Furthermore, the lecture maintains a different point of view. The professor indicates that if the "swamp gas" or other methane gas that lead to Tunguska explosion as what the reading urge, we couldn't account the number of tree at that place. For there shouldn't be any single tree alive原来是single tree alive我死都米听清是single啥。我还以为是个single 坑和痕迹而不是大片痕迹了~~哭死~~, It may have evidence about the absence and disappearances of trees.       3 ]4 {9 I) ?% y; n7 {* y$ G$ K* F' A
=======================================
q( v( a7 D
第二段原文 ：The asteroid did not have to crash into the Earth as an intact rock. When an asteroid or comet enters the Earth, it could explore in the lower atmosphere before hitting the ground. Under rapid heat and pressure, the space rock slammimg into the Earth could have explored into a huge fireball over Tunguska  + ]5 d8 v9 h+ V" j
& @/ `1 ^5 D" G4 p
IF ^^^^gas^^^, The huge fireball would concentrate on one spot) @) W  S. Q2 n' m1 ]' T
The traces of Tunguska has a epicenter of destruction 4 q9 V5 R! M# R' O  h6 f
' q4 {9 ^+ `% R* r


呃………要是考试写成这篇这样应该limited了。后两个观点完全没听懂，再瞎扯……
sorry这么晚才改，我的网啊我的网~~~~我应该比你更limited了~~唉~~~加油加油~~

heqiang_1001UID: 2607349

下周二的综合  practice 6 （提前写了，先粘过来）
The reading passage contends three possible reasons about the transition between the cottage industry and the factory industry. The professor's lecture cast doubts on the reading by several points.

First of all, in contrary to the argument that it is the advanced technology that made this transition which is stated in the reading passage, the professor holds the view that the true reason is that the owners of factories hire more workers in order to get high productivity. That is why the industry became boost at time. Though the machines and engines are used in the industry, it is much latter than that time.

Moreover, the lecture opposes to the point made in the reading that it is because a legal to protect private property had been found, the professor put an example of Holland. There is also an establishment of a seem-like legal in Hollond during cottage industry period, but it dose not drive that society to the factory indutry. So this explanation is not reasonable.   

Furthermore, while the reading passage demonstrates that people want to decline their production costs which lead to this transition , the lecture maintains a different point of view. The professor indicates that though it indeed save costs in some certain aspects, There still increase plenty of costs in other aspects. For example, the y must spend money to buy new machines and engines as well as investment in new factory buildings.The new hired supervisor and the switch to the capitalist also cost money when the society transits to the industry.  

To sum up, the contents about the reasons of the transition between the cottage industry and the factory industry are totally contradicted by the lecture.

字数 282
第一个观点漏掉了一个方面：
Most available machines including steam engines, are still on the experimental stage. They could not be actually used to boost production.