- 最后登录
- 2020-3-13
- 在线时间
- 266 小时
- 寄托币
- 604
- 声望
- 4
- 注册时间
- 2010-4-23
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 32
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 475
- UID
- 2803531

- 声望
- 4
- 寄托币
- 604
- 注册时间
- 2010-4-23
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 32
|
本帖最后由 xianyejiayu 于 2011-2-18 01:01 编辑
Argument51
In this argument, the author advocates that taking antibiotics is effective for the patients with muscle stains. Relying on the result of a study in which two groups of patient have been treated respectively with antibiotics and sugar pills by two different doctors. The statistics show that the group with antibiotics relatively has shorter recuperation time. Though it seems reasonable, there are several flows as it stands.
To begin with, the author recommends to take antibiotics as part of their treatment since there is a long suspected, secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. How can we treat the muscle strain in some lighter degree similar to the severe muscle strain? Some unexpected negative effect may occur such as resisting of drugs. Or otherwise, granted that the all of the patients are caught with the severe muscle strain, just based on the mere fact we can not represent the whole patients will surely keep from healing quickly. Furthermore, there is no evidence to support that people caught with muscle strain will definitely met with the secondary muscle strain. If it is in this case, the author’s recommendation seems illogical and groundless.
Additionally, it is unwarranted that the author assumes that situations of health in 2 groups are equal without taking other alternatives into consideration. It is entirely possible that they are in different ages, people first group are youth who boast with strong body, even they injured in a basketball game, or the traffic accident, that just need a short time to recuperate. Another group is the age bracket above 50 years old, maybe even they take the most effective medicine in the world, they will need a long time to recovery. Or perhaps the degree of the injured is unknown, it is hardly to know whether all of the patients in experiments suffered with severe muscle stain, and whether they all caught with the second infections. Without citing more detail information, it is unconvincing to reach the conclusion that antibiotics have great effect of sever muscle stains.
Granted that situations of patients in 2 groups are equal, the author also fails to assume that both doctors take the most efficient way to treat them. Different working experience of two doctors may lead them to treat for the patients in different ways, we don’t know whether Dr. Newland take some other effective ways during the treatment, such as some special rehabilitation. Or otherwise, maybe sugar pills have some negative aspects which impede the treatment of the muscle strain. Just based on the mere fact that taking antibiotics is quicker than sugar pills, the author cannot convince me that all patients diagnosed with muscle stains would well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatments.
Additionally, the author fails to take the negative effects of antibiotics into consideration. Not the whole people can adapt to the variety of antibiotics or it may arouse a serious result to our surroundings. Some patients may be irritable to the antibiotics, it seems unadvisable to take antibiotics which may cause other diseases that more serious than muscle strain.
All in all, without citing more persuasive example or more detailed information, it is groundless and unwarranted to conclude antibiotics have some bright impacts to the muscle stains. To better evaluate the conclusion, I would need more information about a more particular and cogent experiment, and the negative aspects of all kinds of drugs before drawing a definite conclusion. |
|