Daily Writing by PSB门下走猫

PSB门下走猫UID: 3232869

20120109

一个多小时，码出一篇四不像....有种用不上劲的感觉....唉.....


Have you ever dreamed about finish your work in one day and then have a 6-day off every week? There's a similar

advise in the statement above: 3-day work and 4-day off. The schadule is attractive if you think about the 2 extra

holidays,however,when actually applied,this schadule may probably do harm to both work efficiency and your health.


First,the word "work" here means a series of regular,long-term tasks,and one just can not complete them in a single

week.So compressing the work days from 5 to 3 is meanningless for end up the tasks more quickly.in fact,on the

contrary,it may cause a descend in efficiency.Think about a person continuing focus on formula, diagrams and data

reports,is it possible to keep the same concentration for,say,12 hours? A recent research about human brain by

professor Selephant of Cerlin University said:"no." Actually as time goes by,the efficiency apparently declines

after 8 hours of hard work,considering short breaks.And according to the 4-day off schadule,one should work for at

least 11 hours per day to finish the same amount of work as the 8-hour 5-day employers.as individual efficiency

declines,work following this schadule would be less efficient.


Moreover,to complete tasks fit for 5 days in 3 days is highly challenging and stressful.the long time,extremely

stressful work would make you nervous,even cause hysteria.Some may argue that the relatively long vacation can

totally fix that.But there's no evidence to suggest that claim.Even though this method works,wouldn't it a waste of

holidays to restore from that? Maybe a 20-hour sleep? Doesn't that miss the true meanning of holidays——enjoy your

life as much as possible?


Admittedly,views of value and life styles vary from individual to individual.There's never a proximate work schadule

for everyone.People should just weigh the pros and cons by themselves and choose the best way to work and live.

danteksjUID: 2977437

1# PSB门下走猫
Have you ever dreamt （dreamed） about finish your work in one day and then have a 6-day off every week? There's a similar , r* c; J1 q5 k1 N0 t2 G- l
5 |9 \; s4 j/ W  H+ L
advise in the statement above: 3-day work and 4-day off. The schadule is attractive if you think about the 2 extra 2 g# k$ _3 O. @' O5 Y  M
holidays,however,when actually applied,this schadule may probably do harm to both work efficiency and your health.（很赞 显功底）
! y! q! |9 h0 {! T+ s' M
: g# Y8 [+ {9 U) M


First,the word "work" here means a series of regular,long-term tasks,and one just can not complete them in a single 1 t7 l! K) p2 h5 M/ g# H1 F
$ A0 o7 a# |. I2 O+ @) h
week.So compressing the work days from 5 to 3 is meanningless for end up the tasks more quickly.in fact,on the 6 n  O/ g6 @4 v5 W/ X
8 P% o: w% Y8 q: |1 i: V/ E& {
contrary,it may cause a descend in efficiency.Think about a person continuing focus on formula, diagrams and data
reports,is it possible to keep the same concentration for,say,12 hours? （到这虽然语言很好 但是前面几句逻辑略乱 开头下定义 工作是long-term regular的不能在一周内完成 说的是持续性，第二句说的是效率）A recent research about human brain by % {; e, [8 D- P- Z( _professor Selephant of Cerlin University said:"no." Actually as time goes by,the efficiency apparently declines after 8 hours of hard work,considering short breaks.And according to the 4-day off schadule,one should work for at
" e, }8 O1 L5 b& c& \# least 11 hours per day to finish the same amount of work as the 8-hour 5-day employers.as individual efficiency $ P& Z+ b8 _- X9 q
" G3 P& P1 E9 j# F% M
declines,work following this schadule would be less efficient（如果本段都要说效率 那段首最好点明，然后例子光列名字感觉不是特别有用。t考论证不是考知识贮备。）.* J+ e% s! w; m! w. l% W

2 R: U$ N' ?3 K8 O/ ~* q
3 e9 G6 }( w2 x% N3 f& V


Moreover,to complete tasks fit for 5 days in 3 days is highly challenging and stressful.the long time,extremely
4 D$ H8 y4 d# c! _4 ]/ ^: ?% N
stressful work would make you nervous,even cause hysteria.Some may argue that the relatively long vacation can 3 i. f% ]2 j' s0 T1 n! r) T! T9 U
& w$ c: }6 U4 Z) g
totally fix that.But there's no evidence to suggest that claim（好熟悉。。argument lz考过g吧。。。）.Even though this method works,wouldn't it a waste of 9 t' P) t1 H+ M
" B3 M* k% Y% V6 H! k; holidays to restore from that? Maybe a 20-hour sleep? Doesn't that miss the true meanning of holidays——enjoy your
0 f& B" ^$ y$ z
life as much as possible?; i$ [! T+ @" N) Q4 C/ p: h6 d
1 w) B" ^% z$ R

Admittedly,values价值观（views of value） and life styles vary from individual to individual.There's never a proximate（这个词不太对近似 即将发生的意思 你想表达generally applicable的感觉么？） work schedule（schadule） % {4 b) A5 q8 Y+ t" _1 [
  t: j* e2 u( u
for everyone.People should just weigh the pros and cons by themselves and choose the best way to work and live（LZ语言没的说 只能找些鸡蛋挑骨头找些逻辑的错 呵呵， 还有LZ的排版太纠结了，，，我这里都调整不了。。。）.

PSB门下走猫UID: 3232869

喵喵喵太感人了.....居然被说语言好ls乃是瞎眼了咩……
第二段适合放首句的TS一直没想出来，就按中国思维走了，先定义，然后真正说效率的TS放在第二句....

那个证据是...编的....支持度...够么？捂脸爬走.....
approximate 咦不是合适的意思么好吧我的单词背乱掉了....appropriate可以不？

jiangze2008UID: 3079171

真的不好意思上传晚了。。。共同加油！

PSB门下走猫UID: 3232869

RE ls
谢谢修改~