argu的评分以反例多少为主还是找到的逻辑错误多少为主？

mynameisamoUID: 3175375

如果argument我只找到两个逻辑可以攻击的点，是不是太少了？

比如这个A78："Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse in Palm City, but last month we discovered that over $20,000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage. Meanwhile, the Buzzoff Pest Control Company, which we have used for many years in Palm City, continued to service our warehouse in Wintervale, and last month only $10,000 worth of the food stored there had been destroyed by pest damage. This difference in pest damage is best explained by the negligence of Fly-Away."


但是每个攻击点都找到了2个以上的反例，可以弥补攻击点这个问题么？

总而言之，评分是以反例多少为主还是以找到的逻辑错误点（攻击点）的数目为主呀？

多谢各位前辈了！！

watertcafeUID: 2999484

逻辑点要找主要的，其次攻击的时候要条理分明，就是要argumative
你写的攻击论点得让人信服，这才是最重要的
举反例是攻击的一个手段，不是全部哦

mynameisamoUID: 3175375

2# watertcafe
谢谢斑竹！那是不是2个攻击点太少了啊？

能不能球球斑竹帮我看一下这一篇argument我写的怎么样啊……

https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1358304-1-1.html

球球斑竹了！！多谢！！