616G i56 求拍~~~

loly_heUID: 3242491

56 Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
很多重要的发现或创造都是偶然的：通常，人们为一个问题寻求答案时，通常获得其他问题的答案。

提纲：
1. 跨学科因素使偶然性发现成为可能。
2. 没有直觉和敏感性就不会有偶然性创造
3. 过分夸大偶然性会忽略努力。

The speaker claims that many discoveries and creations are found in case of accident, with reason that people could always find answers to other questions besides ones they are focusing on. Although there are many cases that chances bring discoveries, I tend to agree that chances cannot contribute alone without intuitive ability of human beings and hard working.

To begin with, as almost every field of researches involves interdisciplinary elements to some extent, making occasional discovery is very likely to happen. To bring creations, one needs to look further and wider on undetected clues. Thus, facts on other fields, especially in everyday lives, could inspire researchers by some relating but diverging facts. For example, because logic are always applied in businesses and wars, a logician may find clues of The Game Theory when reading a business case, or watching a war movie; A sociologist could find methods of symbiosis when traveling in a rainforest because of the similarity between human society and nature; And an engineer may be inspired by the way a spider constructing its tenacious and delicate wet. In short, with closed combination between different fields of research, the possibility that one can create inventions by accident should never be dismissed.

However, upon this foundation, it is our intuition and sensibility that support discoveries, not chance. In 1928, a scientist forgot to cover some bacteria in the lab, and found that the bacteria were all killed by some other kind of creature, which were found out to be penicillin. Undoubted, chance is one of facts leading to this discovery, but not the only one. Imagine what would happen if that scientist didn't realize the existing of penicillin, and attributed the phenomenon to other insignificant facts? This discovery, like many similar occasional creations, is result of human beings' talents of intuition and sensibility after accidents. Therefore, without these kinds of gifts, no matter how people try to find answers to one question by thinking on another question, they might not success.

Besides, we must recognize that, overrating the ability of occasional accidents will let us face the risk of ignoring importance of true hard working. If people come to believe that most of the crucial discoveries are found in accidents, which are not likely to be controlled, they will be lead to random activities and hold unserious attitude to scientific research. Actually, most of the creations are results of laborious activities with their initial goals. To build up the first artificial machine that can fly like a bird, the Wright brothers made thousands of experiments, and devoted unimaginable efforts and energy. Any theory that attributes this accomplishment to accidents is unfair. Furthermore, even in occasional discovery cases, there is a need for laborious work to turn that accident into practical research results. In the penicillin case, after recognizing that the bacteria are eaten by certain useful creatures, the scientist need more work to find out what it was and how to make it to help people.

In sum, it is the occasional finding and hard work that together build our scientific systems, and ability of neither of them should be ignored. Thus, in a world that chances and efforts always working to together, the benefit of learning to control them together is with no doubt.


个人觉得写得不是很有说服力，一直在说偶然性发现是可能的，没有证明是“很多的”，主要是懒得找很多例子，也不想背那些科学家的名字。。。
各位大侠怎么看？

niuniuaUID: 3274179

The speaker claims that many discoveries and creations are found in case of accidents, with
reason that people could always find answers to other questions besides ones they are focusing on. Although there are many cases that chances bring discoveries, I tend to agree that chances cannot contribute alone without intuitive ability of human beings and hard working(the intuitive ability and hard working of human beings 应该好点).

To begin with, as almost every field of researches involves interdisciplinary elements to some extent, making occasional discovery is very likely to happen. To bring creations, one needs to look further and wider on undetected clues. Thus, facts on other fields, especially in everyday lives, could inspire researchers by some relating but diverging facts. For example, because logic are(is) always applied in businesses and wars, a logician may find clues of The Game Theory when reading a business case, or watching a war movie; A(分好后面开头也是小写,下同) sociologist could find methods of symbiosis when traveling in a rainforest because of the similarity between human society and nature; And an engineer may be inspired by the way a spider constructing its tenacious and delicate wet. In short, with(considering) closed combination between(of) different fields of researches, the possibility that one can create inventions by accident should never be dismissed.

However, upon this foundation, it is our intuition and sensibility that support discoveries, not chance. In 1928, a scientist forgot to cover some bacteria in the lab, and found that the bacteria were all killed by some other kind of creature, which were found out to be penicillin. Undoubted, chance is one of facts leading to this discovery, but not the only one. Imagine what would happen if that scientist didn't realize the existing of penicillin, and attributed the phenomenon to other insignificant facts? This discovery, like many similar occasional creations, is result of human beings' talents of intuition and sensibility after accidents. Therefore, without these kinds of gifts, no matter how people try to find answers to one question by thinking on another question, they might not success(succeed).

Besides, we must recognize that, overrating the ability of occasional accidents will let us face the risk of ignoring importance of true hard working. If people come to believe that most of the crucial discoveries are found in accidents, which are not likely to be controlled, they will be lead to random activities and hold unserious attitude to scientific research. Actually, most of the creations are results of laborious activities with their initial goals. To build up the first artificial machine that can fly like a bird, the Wright brothers made thousands of experiments, and devoted unimaginable efforts and energy. Any theory that attributes this accomplishment to accidents is unfair. Furthermore, even in occasional discovery cases, there is a need for laborious work to turn that accident into practical research results. In the penicillin case, after recognizing that the bacteria are eaten by certain useful creatures, the scientist need more work to find out what it was and how to make it to help people.

In sum, it is the occasional finding and hard work that together build our scientific systems, and ability of neither of them should be ignored. Thus, in a world that chances and efforts always working (to) together, the benefit of learning to control them together(coordinately) is with no doubt(with no doubt 貌似类似副词，With no doubt ,it  blabla... ).

你的用词表达已经很不错了呀，论证思路暂时我也没想到更多的，期待大神的出现！

niuniuaUID: 3274179

https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1384283-1-1.html
这是我写的另一篇，有空帮忙看看吧，我觉得你用词很准确的

Jibin1987UID: 3322498

Here we go...
The speaker claims that many discoveries and creations are found in case of accident        
in case of something:  used to describe what you should do in a particular situation, especially on official notices:
exp: In case of fire, break the glass.
you may just use 'by accident'

with reason that people could always find answers to other questions besides ones they are focusing on.

be careful of using words like 'always'. I don't think the speaker said you can always find answers, instead, he said usually.
In my opinion, 'with reason that people could possibly find answers to another question while they are focusing on one question'

Although there are many cases that chances bring discoveries.

I am not sure if this is a correct expression. If you're sure about that then stick to it.

In my opinion, 'Although there are many cases of serendipity'

I tend to agree that chances cannot contribute alone without intuitive ability of human beings and hard working.

contribute to....

'Strictly speaking, intuitive ability is not the key. It is needed for a individual to be sagacious enough to link together apparently innocuous facts in order to com to a valuable conclusion.  

In my opinion, 'I tend to agree that chance cannot contribute alone to success without individual's sagacity on certain subjects and hard working.'

In paragraph 4, 'Any theory that attributes this accomplishment to accidents is unfair'

I think this is totally irrelevant. No body and no theory would like to attribute this kind of accomplishment to accidents.

http://science.discovery.com/brink/top-ten/accidental-inventions/inventions.html

website for Top 10 accidental inventions

Good words from Louis Pasteur

"Chance favors the prepared mind."

loly_heUID: 3242491

3# niuniua

谢谢哈，我发现那个doubt的用法的确有问题，我要考虑换一个结尾了~

loly_heUID: 3242491

4# Jibin1987

好专业！受教了~~~谢谢~~~