36套第14套的第五题，求大神解释，谢谢

greylightningUID：3432912

One of the principal themes of Walzer's critique of liberal
capitalism is that it is insufficiently egalitarian. Walzer's
case against the economic inequality generated by   
capitalism and in favor of "a radical redistribution of   
5    wealth" is presented in a widely cited essay entitled "In
Defense of Equality." The most striking feature of
Walzer's critique is that, far from rejecting the principle of
reward according to merit, Walzer insists on its validity.
People who excel should receive the superior
10    benefits appropriate to their excellence. But people
exhibit a great variety of qualities—"intelligence,
physical strength, agility and grace, artistic creativity,
mechanical skill, leadership, endurance, memory,
psychological insight, the capacity for hard   
15    work—even moral strength, sensitivity, the ability to
express compassion."Each deserves its proper
recompense, and hence a proper distribution of material
goods should reflect human differences as measured on
all these different scales. Yet, under capitalism, the ability
20    to make money ("the green thumb of bourgeois society")
enables its possessor to acquire almost "every other sort
of social good," such as the respect and esteem of others.

5.The passage provides sufficient information to
    answer which of the following questions EXCEPT?   

□A  What weight in relation to other qualities   
should a quality like sensitivity have,   
according to Walzer, in determining the   
proper distribution of goods?   
□B   Which quality does Walzer deem too highly
      valued under liberal capitalism?   
□C   Which are the social goods that are, according
      to Walzer, outside the reach of the power of
      money?
答案是AC，为什么要选C? 根据最后一句话中的 such as the respect and esteem of others
很明显能排除C啊

Batigoal0611UID：3300324

你最后一句话没有看懂。
Yet, under capitalism, the ability
to make money ("the green thumb of bourgeois society")
enables its possessor to acquire almost "every other sort
of social good," such as the respect and esteem of others.
意思是有钱人几乎什么都能有，比如尊重。
然后C是：钱买不到什么？---文中没提到。

greylightningUID：3432912

Batigoal0611 发表于 2013-6-4 10:10
你最后一句话没有看懂。
Yet, under capitalism, the ability
to make money ("the green thumb of bour ...

我是这样理解的：C选项中有according to Walzer，说明问的是Walzer的观点，而最后一句话是Walzer所反对的，所以应该对最后一句取反变为：钱不应该什么都能买到，比如尊重。

天薇凉UID：3403940

greylightning 发表于 2013-6-4 10:33
我是这样理解的：C选项中有according to Walzer，说明问的是Walzer的观点，而最后一句话是Walzer所反对的 ...

不知道你为什么要取反。。。原文的意思表达的很清楚，你不要死磕自己的理由，根据文章内容来。

greylightningUID：3432912

是我多想了。。。

katrinewongUID：3516586

求问A选项怎么翻...
谢谢