Arg 1 Palean Basket unique
Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a 'Palean' basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Claim 1:Palean Basket is only made by the Palean people Data 1: Palean Basket had only been found in the immediate vicinity of Palea village Warrant 1: the present known place that found the Palean Basket is the place it was made. Evidence: More information about the archaeological progress in the nearby area around the Palea. More information on the discovery of Palean Basket. Whether it is easily preserved even after the long history. The Condition of Palea, whether it has the condition that allows the basket to preserve throughout the long history.
Claim 2: ancient Paleans could not cross the Brim River Data 2: The Brim River is very deep and broad and there is no boat found Warrant 2: 1. Brim River is as deep and broad in ancient times as today 2. There is no other way other than by boat to cross the Brim River 3. Ancient Paleans had no boat. Evidence: The geographic information in ancient times of Palea and Brim River. The wether conditions in ancient times of Palea.
Claim 3: so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean Data3 : 1. archaeologists discovered such a 'Palean' basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. 2. Claim2: ancient Paleans could not cross the Brim River Warrant3: the basket could be brought to Lithos only by people.
首段 The argument states that the so-called Palean baskets may not be uniquely Palean as one had been found in a village from across a river. To evaluate the credibility of the argument conclusion, a lot more evidences are needed in order to illustrate as least the three following aspects: archaeological progress of Palean Basket, whether Palean baskets could be brought to Lithos only by people and whether Paleans could cross the Brim River.
中间段 The argument assumes if Palean basket is made by Palean people, its appearance in Lithos has to be brought over by people. However, many other ways could also do the work. The baskets has been preserved for thousands of years, a long time that plains could have become mountains. The basket might be buried in Palea however moved to Lithos along with geographical plate movement, and therefore were discovered there. It could also be brought by hurricanes, flood or simply drift over along Brim River. Without contradictory evidences, it could even be carried there by a boring bird, who stole the basket from Palea, flew to Lithos, and dropped it there.
|