0510G同主题写作第五期——Issue48

frankwxUID: 203457

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1

翦瞳UID: 184872

交作业啦！
可惜限时未成功，修改时拼写错误和时态错误也很多。
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=301789

lilian1904UID: 179160

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1

bingwaterUID: 2116559

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D103

Pluto13003780UID: 2118087

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1

abbyUID: 208335

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D103

shanekunUID: 2104358

严重超时。。
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=302505
请拍！

sharon84UID: 2110816

欢迎多拍转：）
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... ge=1&highlight=

northUID: 210816

Most history books treat the history changes as the accomplishments of the great individuals, and according to this view, the great historical movers and shakers are Napoleons and Lincolns and so on. While the equal important groups of people does not acknowledged, that would ignores the society’ s importance.
  To begin with, the study of history does place too much emphasis on individuals. When you study the social history, you just see George Washington who is the leader of the independence war and Lenin who is the leader of the working –class revolution. While study the science history, we find Galileo, Newton, Einstein, and such famous scientists. No words about the people whose identities have long been forgotten.
  However, that emphasis would ignore the equal important influence made by the common people and the society. For example, Abraham Lincoln is often memorialized as the central figure in the Civil War and the emancipation of American slaves. Emphasize Lincoln as a central figure would fails to acknowledge the action of thousands of other individuals, including the slaves themselves. In addition, placing emphasis on a single individual may cause students to ignore the importance of history itself. They may remember Lincoln and his name, but fails to understand the gravity of the slave situation that occurred at that time.
  Some people might argue that if the social history is made by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten, the scientific and the artistic developments were just pushed by the few famous scientists and artists. However, it is not necessary the case. Without the supports from the society few researches can be done. The tax payer just warrant the economic needs for the research and the democratic society provides a good environment for the science to develop rapidly. And also the artists has got the economic support by both government and private, the civilized society help the artists create more freely.  
  In sum, the most significant events and trends in history can not be made by the famous few alone, they were just made by the groups of people and the society as a whole. When the study of history just emphasizes the importance of the famous individuals, it should not ignore the role that the common people play.

armstrongUID: 204256

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D2

rwbosscat95UID: 186217

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=302712

chris_zhUID: 2101887

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
我的第一篇Issue,大家猛烈地拍吧！！必会拍

MIMOSARLUID: 2112846

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=302791

jason0926UID: 200697

情大家有空来看看吧,谢谢
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... ge=1&highlight=

claymanUID: 2102470

比较早写的，好后面的座啊
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=302944