- 最后登录
- 2012-10-12
- 在线时间
- 388 小时
- 寄托币
- 1158
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-4-23
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 24
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 825
- UID
- 206840

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1158
- 注册时间
- 2005-4-23
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 24
|
发表于 2005-10-4 22:31:57
|显示全部楼层
巨抓狂的一篇文章.
请教23-27题如何定位分析?谢谢!
Many literary detectives have pored over a great
puzzle concerning the writer Marcel Proust: what
happened in 1909? How did Contre Saint-Beuve,
an essay attacking the methods of the critic Saint
(5) Beuve, turn into the start of the novel Remembrance
of Things Past? A recently published letter from Proust
to the editor Vallette confirms that Fallois, the editor of
the 1954 edition of Contre Saint-Beuve, made an essen-
tially correct guess about the relationship of the essay
(10)to the novel. Fallois proposed that Proust had tried to
begin a novel in 1908, abandoned it for what was to be
a long demonstration of Saint-Beuve’s blindness to the
real nature of great writing, found the essay giving rise
to personal memories and fictional developments, and
(15)allowed these to take over in a steadily developing novel.
Draft passages in Proust’s 1909 notebooks indicate
that the transition from essay to novel began in Contre
Saint-Beuve, when Proust introduced several examples
to show the powerful influence that involuntary memory
(20)exerts over the creative imagination. In effect, in trying
to demonstrate that the imagination is more profound
and less submissive to the intellect than Saint-Beuve
assumed, Proust elicited vital memories of his own
and, finding subtle connections between them, began
(25)to amass the material for Remembrance. By August,
Proust was writing to Vallette, informing him of his
intention to develop the material as a novel. Maurice
Bardeche, in Marcel Proust, romancier, has shown the
importance in the drafts of Remembrance of sponta-
(30)neous and apparently random associations of Proust’s
subconscious. As incidents and reflections occurred to
Proust, he continually inserted new passages altering
and expanding his narrative. But he found it difficult
to control the drift of his inspiration. The very richness
(35)and complexity of the meaningful relationships that kept
presenting and rearranging themselves on all levels, from
abstract intelligence to profound dreamy feelings, made
it difficult for Proust to set them out coherently. The
beginning of control came when he saw how to connect
(40)the beginning and the end of his novel.
Intrigued by Proust’s claim that he had “begun and
finished” Remembrance at the same time, Henri Bonnet
discovered that parts of Remembrance’s last book were
actually started in 1909. Already in that year, Proust
(45)had drafted descriptions of his novel’s characters in
their old age that would appear in the final book of
Remembrance, where the permanence of art is set against
the ravages of time. The letter to Vallette, drafts of the
essay and novel, and Bonnet’s researches establish in
(50)broad outline the process by which Proust generated his
novel out of the ruins of his essay. But those of us who
hoped, with Kolb, that Kolb’s newly published complete
edition of Proust’s correspondence for 1909 would docu-
ment the process in greater detail are disappointed. For
(55)until Proust was confident that he was at last in sight of a
viable structure for Remembrance, he told few correspon-
dents that he was producing anything more ambitious
than Contre Saint-Beuve.
21. The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) the role of involuntary memory in Proust’s
writing
(B) evidence concerning the genesis of Proust’s
novel Remembrance of Things Past
(C) conflicting scholarly opinions about the value
of studying the drafts of Remembrance of
Things Past
(D) Proust’s correspondence and what it reveals
about Remembrance of Things Past
(E) the influence of Saint-Beuve’s criticism on
Proust’s novel Remembrance of Things Past
22. It can be inferred from the passage that all of the
following are literary detectives who have tried, by
means of either scholarship or criticism, to help
solve the “great puzzle” mentioned in lines 1-2
EXCEPT
(A) Bardeche (B) Bonnet (C) Fallois
(D) Kolb (E) Vallette
23. According to the passage, in drafts of Contre Saint-
Beuve Proust set out to show that Saint-Beuve made
which of the following mistakes as a critic?
I. Saint-Beuve made no effort to study the devel-
opment of a novel through its drafts and
revisions.
II. Saint-Beuve assigned too great a role in the
creative process to a writer’s conscious
intellect.
III. Saint-Beuve concentrated too much on
plots and not enough on imagery and other
elements of style.
(A) II only (B) III only (C) I and II only
(D) I and III only (E) I, II, and III
24. Which of the following best states the author’s atti-
tude toward the information that scholars have gath-
ered about Proust’s writing in 1909?
(A) The author is disappointed that no new docu-
ments have come to light since Fallois’s specu-
lations.
(B) The author is didsatisfied because there are too
many gaps and inconsistencies in the drafts.
(C) The author is confident that Fallois’s 1954 guess
has been proved largely correct, but regrets
that still more detailed documentation
concerning Proust’s transition from the essay to
the novel has not emerged.
(D) The author is satisfied that Fallois’s judgment
was largely correct, but feels that Proust’s
early work in designing and writing the
novel was probably far more deliberate
than Fallois’s description of the process would
suggest.
(E) The author is satisfied that the facts of Proust’s
life in 1909 have been thoroughly established,
but believes such documents as drafts and
correspondence are only of limited value in
a critical assessment of Proust’s writing.
25. The author of the passage implies that which of the
following would be the LEAST useful source of
information about Proust’s transition from working
on Contre Saint-Beuve to having a viable structure
for Remembrance of Things Past?
(A) Fallois’s comments in the 1954 edition of
Contre Saint-Beuve
(B) Proust’s 1909 notebooks, including the drafts of
Remembrance of Things Past
(C) Proust’s 1909 correspondence, excluding the
letter to Vallette
(D) Bardeche’s Marcel Proust, romancier
(E) Bonnet’s researches concerning Proust’s drafts
of the final book of Remembrance of Things
Past
26. The passage offers information to answer which of
the following questions?
(A) Precisely when in 1909 did Proust decide to
abandon Contre Saint-Beuve?
(B) Precisely when in 1909 did Proust decide to
connect the beginning and the end of
Remembrance of Things Past?
(C) What was the subject of the novel that Proust
attempted in 1908?
(D) What specific criticisms of Saint-Beuve appear,
in fictional form, in Remembrance of Things
Past?
(E) What is a theme concerning art that appears in
the final book of Remembrance of Things
Past?
27. Which of the following best describes the relation-
ship between Contre Saint-Beuve and Remembrance
of Things Past as it is explained in the passage?
(A) Immediately after abandoning Contre Saint-
Beuve, at Vallette’s suggestion, Proust started
Remembrance as a fictional demonstration
that Saint-Beuve was wrong about the
imagination.
(B) Immediately after abandoning Contre Saint-
Beuve, at Vallette’s suggestion, Proust turned
his attention to Remembrance, starting with
incidents that had occurred to him while
planning the essay.
(C) Despondent that he could not find a coherent
structure for Contre Saint-Beuve, an essay
about the role of memory in fiction, Proust
began instead to write Remembrance, a novel
devoted to important early memories.
(D) While developing his argument about the
imagination in Contre Saint-Beuve, Proust
described and began to link together
personal memories that became a foundation
for Remembrance.
(E) While developing his argument about memory
and imagination in Contre Saint-Beuve,
Proust created fictional characters to embody
the abstract themes in his essay.
[ Last edited by leo_chen on 2005-10-4 at 22:46 ] |
|