【G盟阅读日记篇】orangetree,iceoolong（欢迎其他G友随时加入哦！）

orangetreeUID: 189984

好像就是有问题！！昨天我也没有进来，比你还惨，连回复界面都见不着！
先来补上昨天的说！

orangetreeUID: 189984

NO.5-2-1短文，10分钟，错18，19，20。汗。。。。。。
17主题题。
18罗马细节题，I在L4,internal representation of the viewed object. II在L10, objects are recognized as wholes, III为什么对呢？不是说有两种看法吗？一种说是一步，一种说是一系列步？？19取非题，开始想选B来的，后来觉得有问题，如果见过类似特征的就不一定有没有match的过程啦，所以就没选，再看下来，觉得就没有对的啦！后来参考其他人的解释，“B应该定位在文章2、3句，原文说啥就是啥，它说when...again,it is matched，故定位改写。其实是个很僵化的东西”。晕菜！
20态度题，错得真是太白啦，单词认错了一个，看来还要继续背呀！
NO.5-2-1长文，首段说历史学家在对女权运动进行研究时，关注妇女在各个历史时期的成就。Although让步之后转折，研究古代的难，列举4点（对应22题。）。thus再转折，出现负态度,因为时间久远而受置疑，not so far gone unchallenged.具体举JB来说，他以Amazon地区和古希腊作比较。
二段说JB的研究基于传说，史诗，描写中的妇女成就。
三段转折 Nonetheless, 说myths 保存的事实有问题。与古希腊的对立。
四段thus转折，不能用文学作品作依据。30分钟，错23，25。
21主题题，因为是argument，看到criticize再看了看后面，是对的。
22列举题，由premodern culture和sources定位到L5-L8，number-->D.limited quantity，difficult to interpret-->C.difficulty of interpretation，contradictory-->E.tendency toward contradiction， fragmentary -->A.partial completeness。列举是个通常考点，尤其是3-4个的列举，一定要在读原文的时候给出标记，这样EXCEPT和罗马数字题都容易考到  
23题细节题，只能用myth定位，没什么更好的办法了。III的almost all要注意哦，一般在读原文的时候，最高级，唯一性的句子，词汇一定要做标记，这样，选项中如果出现了最高级，唯一性，就可以很快的排除或者选择了。II是不用看的，I肯定对，III肯定错，没必要看II就可以选择了，这也是做罗马数字题型的一个小技巧。
24题，定位for example, as the equivalents of giants and centaurs, enemies to be slain ……先看题干，是谁对谁，是Greek对Amazons，另外看原文的一个重要的词equivalents，这是反映事物之间的关系的词，必然考点，读原文时要做纪录，就是说对于希腊人来说，A和大怪物什么的被分成一类。如果说定位应该有三种方法，
1.Greek和A两个大写名词双重定位
2.段落定位，这个定位稍微高级点，呵呵，是在掌握段落结构大意的基础上进行的定位
3.equivalent这个反映事物之间的联系的词汇，在读原文的时候应该特别关注，并作记录，因为我反复说过，事物之间的联系是必然考点，不过这个和大家积累总结的有限有关系，我在罗列所有的反映事物之间的关系的词和例句，有机会呈现给大家。
另外长文章好好体会一下略读二段、三段由大量内容可以略读的    
25细节题，由L45的destructive and dangerous-->wary and hostile。其实在读原文的时候这里应该做标记，因为表达了作者的态度词都是SD，结构指示词，必然考点26细节题，最后限定在B和C，推敲半天觉得C更对一点，就选了。 26题定位首段，推理过程模糊和读原文读什么有一定关系。我们说读原文要略读一些东西，比如说例子，首段L10说an example is...，后面内容根本不用读，只要记下大写名词就可以，读什么呢？读例子的目的，为什么要举这个例子，它起到了什么作用？ 资料来源支离破碎、数量有限、难以解释且通常互相矛盾，如此这般，流传下来而未经challenged例子就是JB...，故选C毫无疑问 27态度题，末句有mistaken,绝对的负态度。

今天短文章形势一篇大好，回过头简要的分析一下这篇文章的结构和读法，也许可以读的更快，做得更准。
首句TS，之后讲了视觉辨认的过程
然后SD出现了:controversy surrounds the question....one-step...or a serial, step-by-step...
这句话为结构指示句的标志词是controversy，意味着下文将要阐述两个对立观点，one-step and step-by step，读到这里，你应该已经知道文章下面要讲什么了，如果还不知道，请转一下脑子，呵呵，在这种情形下应该怎样读原文呢？——勇敢的略读！
psychologists....maintain that...可以看看，发现果然它在讲single operation(one-step)
other psychologists have proposed that...别读了，肯定在说step-by-step
although some experiments show这是一个试验，当然是为了证实上面的说法了，要不要读呢？不要！因为你已经知道它的目的是什么了，内容没有必要知道，关键是要看对它的评价，也就是说它是不是个有效的试验。这里因为although给出了让步，前半句话完全没必要读，其实看到这个although，读者心理应该有数，although这半句话肯定是作者的负评价，证实一下，扫到L17seems to support the serial hypothesis，后面才是作者要说的重点
至此，文章可以读完了
总结：1.试验、证据、数据、调查...内容无比次要，关键是要知道他出现的目的和作者的评价和态度，即对于证实某观点，它是不是有效。
2.although让步句的前半句不用读，因为作者写这样的句子目的是后半句话，给出让步仅仅是为了叙述客观，避免偏激。
3.ETS说得很绝对的句子，一定是让步句，后面必定有转折，比如，这个实验的确说明了某些问题，后面肯定会说，但是它却没能怎样怎样，do,have引导的强调句，还有什么absolutely呀那些绝对的词引导的句子多半是让步。相反，它说的那些很谦虚谨慎的评价反倒容易成为肯定评价，比如短文章L18 seems to supoort...那就不是似乎了，而是绝对是，这也是ETS力求客观公道的一种写作手法。
4.对文章结构的把握永远重于对具体内容的了解，例如短文章L12-L17，你知道它讲了一个step-by-step的观点，有一个试图证明它的experiment就足够了，具体它用什么样的内容阐述这个观点，这个实验又是怎么做的，完全没必要看，如果考题真的考了这部分内容，再回头来看也可以阿，你都知道它在哪儿了，就算你把内容看了，做题的时候也还是要回来看哦，所以，看了就亏了，不看就赚了，嘿嘿。

词汇收集
trigger vt.引发, 引起, 触发n.板机
retrieve v.重新得到n.找回
procedure n.程序, 手续
slay v.<书>杀, 杀死, 宰杀, 杀害, 宰杀, 杀死
ramification n.分枝, 分叉, 衍生物, 支流
ramify v.(使)分枝, (使)分叉, (使)成网状
burgeon n.嫩芽v.萌芽,急速生长
retinal adj.[解]视网膜的，n. 视网膜
speculative adj.思索的; 推理的; 纯理论的

orangetreeUID: 189984

no.5－2－2
短文错3个，怎么这么难呀？？？？(-_-b)
17主题题。作者对V基本持+态度，所以E排除。里面没有看出假设来，A上来就被我cut掉。后来再看哪个都不像啦。我误选了D,D规定了接收某个解释的条件，好像不搭边。
18题，Ⅰ是末句，那一种不采用的之一，seperate的理论，则取非得links。III这样直接做了比较，其实在原文中也能找出依据，因为开始作者实际上是针对V理论的两个方面做出评价的，一个是V解释了年代错误的矛盾，另一个就是关于W作品整体性还是独立性。后面大量篇幅的讨论了关于整体与独立的问题，则自然而然的给出了焦点。II我就没有看出来定位在哪！是set idea这句吗？？怎么解释呀？？ 19题，作者态度的大正小负， refined but legitimate, V的理论当然也是如此！ 要说的一点是refined和subtle基本可以视为同义词，这个subtle是指：微妙的，细致的，精炼的，refined：精炼的。这个精炼并不是说复杂程度，而是指理解的深度和细致程度很精道，入微。20题我还满篇的找呢！后来看花儿的解释才知道在首句！就是从首句判断出来的，全文的确没说some critics，但是首句的那个once thought to be...一定是指V以外的别的评论家。no.5－2－2
长文比较友好，读得条例清楚，呵呵。20分钟做完！错21，24，27。首句TS.
21主题题，我在A D之间抉择。现在看来是没有interaction的。
22细节题核心词radioactivity that occurs naturally on Earth。第二段最后定位。
24细节题，我选了E，不明白！！！请达人们解答！！ 25取非题，末段定位。抓住各段首句的SD，你就会发现，第一段讲atomic,第二段讲nuclear,第三段讲,subnuclear 。gluons出现在第三段。
26推断题，级别越高，粒子月小，爆发的能量越多。所以要有再细分的粒子出现。选E。
27细节题，核心词conditional elementarity定位在L13，原文改写。

还有关于略读的问题，开始不敢略读可能是不知道什么应该略读，所以不敢贸然行事，其实很多文章都有一定的可比性，比如，你可以把今天的短文章和昨天的短文章进行一下横向比较，你会发现文章的结构很类似，昨天的是开始说了一个controversy，今天的是说了both...两个方面，然后下文分别对两个方面进行论述，这样你在知道下文讲的内容的情况下至少可以略读其中一个方面；还有关于例子，experiment,observation,consideration,data等等这些出现在理论和观点后面的“证据”，只要目的已知，内容都可以省略，这一点在昨天和今天的文章中也都有体现，最好比较一下。
其他略读的东西，最好平时多多总结，这样再遇到的时候就可以勇敢的略读了。

今天的短文章的确在作者态度上有其难度，作者反复转折让步这样的短文章还真不多见，故不是特别典型，但是既然大家认真做了这篇文章，也就有必要从中弄清作者对V到底持怎样的态度。
首句话需要读出两个东西
1.once thought to be unified，是曾经被谁认为是一个整体？（新旧对比，必然考点）
2.both a sense of relief and an unpleasant shock对文章下面的内容起到了什么启示作用？（SD，特别关注）
然后L4-L9就是可以想得出的叙述，因为它跟在SD后面，一定是先说relief(comfortably),再转折however,disagreeable...这觉得这几行可以略读，因为读它之前你已经知道它要写什么了，具体内容，不必深究
然后就是consideration,obsevation，这些词大家看了后是不是可以联想一下昨天短文章的那个experiment的作用，无非是一些证据、数据、试验、观察...目的旨在为上面的观点提供详细具体的论述，内容无关紧要，之后作者对它有效性的判断才是关键，所以L9-L14重读one cannot avoid the conclusion that这句结论句。
之后作者的结论是，e,r只是一部作品，但是这并不意味着否定 the theory of independence，but of rejecting its implications:...
冒号之后可以略读，因为它无非是在讲作者认为应该摒弃的一些东西。
不过因为是末句，也可以给点适当的关注，尤其是as seperate as the works of a modern novelists，这里反映了两者之间的关系，是必然考点，要予以关注！
总体来说，作者开始对V的理论进行了正负两个方面的评价，（首句）即relief和unpleasant，但是后来又对unpleasant的这个负评价进行了让步，就是说并没有完全否定，也给与了一定的肯定。
今天的长文章结构实在太清晰了，首句，二句，二、三段首句都是SD，看完这三句话我觉得其余的都可以略读，呵呵，是不是太大胆了呢？当然略读并不是说视而不见，还是要把比较阿，事物的关系阿，最高级阿，大写名词阿，一类的给出标记。

词汇收集：
Chronology ，chron（时间）＋ology n.年代学, 年表
Cumulative，adj.累积的
validity n.有效性, 合法性, 正确性
stipulate v.规定, 保证
subtlety n.稀薄, 微妙, 精明
obscure adj.暗的,模糊的, vt.使暗, 使不明显
irrationality n.不合理
collisions n.碰撞, 冲突
nuclei n.nucleus 的复数形
inert adj.无活动的, 惰性的, 迟钝的
remnant n.残余, 剩余, adj.剩余的, 残留的

orangetreeUID: 189984

毛毛今天要坚持哦！！加油加油！
我还有5list的兰宝要背，晚上咱们再讨论哦！

ouymUID: 2109118

No.5-3

sectionA

短文
错17、18题

长文
这篇最简单，我花了约12分钟，全对！

sectionB

长文
这篇以前做过。错21、22题
第21题：细节题。考对“They were too traditional, too hemmed in by their generation to demand social and political rights.”的理解。选项E中有个conventions和这句话中的traditional对应。
第22题：算类比题吧。不会做！

短文
挺简单的文章，可是我全军覆没了！
对过答案后，觉得还行！好难做的题目！

建议给这个贴子起个名吧，便于搜索！就叫“yuedu”吧，我已经搜过了，暂时没有同名的！楼主以为如何！

楼主发的讨论帖过于冗长！建议把主要问题提出，便于讨论！

[ Last edited by ouym on 2005-9-23 at 21:42 ]

ouymUID: 2109118

贴一个有用的东西


可用的阅读资料及详情 （花儿）

官方试题
no.题
no.题里的阅读共有长文章42篇，短文章42篇，是80年代北美地区的老题，虽然陈旧，但是在有限的阅读资料中也有其宝贵的意义。
    其中有一些文章题目、答案不严谨，也有一些文章的结构类型不明显或者已经过时，还有一些题型已经不考了，但是它的基本套路、特点和新题有很大程度的相关性，做的时候不用太拘泥于题目本身，我想可以用它来作为GRE阅读的入门练习，逐步了解和熟悉GRE阅读的特点和套路
国内题（90-94）
国内题里的阅读共有长文章29篇，短文章29篇，是国内GRE考试真题，经典结构的文章比较多，有相当一部分文章有很强的代表性，适于锻炼做一篇文章的全过程，中后期可以开始卡时间练习。

新题（95-99）
新题里的阅读共有长文章20篇，短文章20篇，是目前可以获得的笔考真题的最新题，建议卡时间练习，做完题后最好进行细致的分析，查找错因，进行较为系统的整理，以求对珍贵资源的充分利用。

pp2里共有阅读长文章34篇，短文章42篇，是ets提供的官方模考资料，具有很强的实效性和利用价值，但是其中有一些和国内题重复。 建议考前1个月左右再做，作为热身，个人认为这是必做题目。

pp3
    机考改笔考以后ets提供的官方模考资料，因为尚未解密，具体文章数不祥

  最有价值的参考书

杨继阅读：
被无数G友公认的最具有参考价值的、载有GRE阅读方法论的、其技巧既适用于机考又适用于笔考的、笔者曾深深受益的经典阅读书。书中对99年以前笔考题的文章类型进行过分类，对90-98的阅读文章进行过翻译和简要讲解。
    不过对于翻译的必要性，我个人持有保留态度。还有书的一点局限就是对于初学者稍显笼统，让很多考生看了之后还是不能精到的掌握要领。 但是不能不拥有！

杨鹏难句
从句子结构，语法和ets增加句子难度的特征方面分类分析了100句左右长难句，对于提高阅读实质能力有很有用，但是有些人反映背过、学过杨鹏难句以后做真题有点“失真”的感觉，因为在读文章之前就人为的掌握了文章比较重要甚至是起到核心作用的句子的含义，对读文解题产生了一定影响。建议做完大量的练习之后再用！

钱坤强GRE阅读理解全中文教程笔记
    对no.题、国内题（包括新题）进行了精确的翻译，钱老师功底深厚，翻译的赏心悦目。
不过做题万万不能依赖于看中文示意，以自己的理解、定位、原文改写为主，实在不明白，小小参考一下！

ouymUID: 2109118

别人怎么都不交作业呢？

[ Last edited by ouym on 2005-9-23 at 23:17 ]

orangetreeUID: 189984

Originally posted by ouym at 2005-9-23 21:38
No.5-3

sectionA

短文
错17、18题

长文
这篇最简单，我花了约12分钟，全对！

[color=R ...

先解释一下：
我的日记中，黑色的字是我的分析，橙色是我的问题，红色是花儿在往年的阅读日记中给的建议，我认为有价值的东西。

我接受毛毛的建议，把分析的（黑色的字）精炼提纯，便于讨论！终于红色的字，我建议还是留下，以便我们讨论时研究一下，或者为其他人提供参考，毛毛你看怎么样？

[ Last edited by orangetree on 2005-9-24 at 12:02 ]

orangetreeUID: 189984

Originally posted by ouym at 2005-9-23 22:50
别人怎么都不交作业呢？

报告毛毛：
俺家昨天停电啦！呜呜！！今天补上！

我也很是疑惑，大家难道都放弃阅读了吗？？   瀑布泪。。。。。。

orangetreeUID: 189984

no5-3-1
The belief that art originates in intuitive rather than
rational faculties was worked out historically and phi-
losophically in the somewhat wearisome volumes of
Benedetto Croce, who is usually considered the orig-
inator of a new aesthetic. Croce was, in fact, express-
ing a very old idea. Long before the Romantics
stressed intuition and self-expression, the frenzy of
inspiration was regarded as fundamental to art, but
philosophers had always assumed it must be controlled
by law and by the intellectual power of putting things
into harmonious order. This general philosophic con-
cept of art was supported by technical necessities. It
was necessary to master certain laws and to use intel-
lect in order to build Gothic cathedrals, or set up the
stained glass windows of Chartres. When this bracing
element of craftsmanship ceased to dominate artists’
outlook, new technical elements had to be adopted to
maintain the intellectual element in art. Such were
linear perspective and anatomy.

17. The passage suggests that which of the following
   would most likely have occurred if linear per-
   spective and anatomy had not come to influence
   artistic endeavor?
  (A) The craftsmanship that shaped Gothic
architecture would have continued to
dominate artists’ outlooks.
  (B) Some other technical elements would have
been adopted to discipline artistic inspi-
ration.
  (C) Intellectual control over artistic inspiration
would not have influenced painting as it
did architecture.
  (D) The role of intuitive inspiration would not
have remained fundamental to theories of
artistic creation.
  (E) The assumptions of aesthetic philosophers
before Croce would have been invalidated.

18. The passage supplies information for answering
   which of the following questions?
  (A) Does Romantic art exhibit the triumph of
intuition over intellect?
  (B) Did an emphasis on linear perspective and
anatomy dominate Romantic art?
  (C) Are the intellectual and intuitive faculties
harmoniously balanced in post-Romantic
art?
  (D) Are the effects of the rational control of
artistic inspiration evident in the great
works of pre-Romantic eras?
  (E) Was the artistic craftsmanship displayed in
Gothic cathedrals also an element in
paintings of this period?

19. The passage implies that which of the following
   was a traditional assumption of aesthetic
   philosophers?
  (A) Intellectual elements in art exert a necessary
  control over artistic inspiration.
  (B) Architecture has never again reached the
  artistic greatness of the Gothic cathedrals.
  (C) Aesthetic philosophy is determined by the
  technical necessities of art.
  (D) Artistic craftsmanship is more important in
  architectural art than in pictorial art.
  (E) Paintings lacked the intellectual element
  before the invention of linear perspective
  and anatomy

20. The author mentions “linear perspective and
   anatomy” in the last sentence in order to do
   which of the following ?
  (A) Expand his argument to include painting as
  well as architecture
  (B) Indicate his disagreement with Croce’s
  theory of the origins of art
  (C) Support his point that rational order of
  some kind has often seemed to discipline
  artistic inspiration
  (D) Explain the rational elements in Gothic
  painting that corresponded to craftsmanship
  in Gothic architecture
  (E) Show the increasing sophistication of artists
  after the Gothic period

(The passage below is drawn from an article published in 1962.)

Computer programmers often remark that com-
puting machines, with a perfect lack of discrimina-
tion, will do any foolish thing they are told to do. The
reason for this lies, of course, in the narrow fixation
of the computing machine’s “intelligence” on the
details of its own perceptions—its inability to be
guided by any large context. In a psychological
description of the computer intelligence, three related
adjectives come to mind: single-minded, literal-
minded, and simpleminded. Recognizing this, we
should at the same time recognize that this single-
mindedness, literal-mindedness, and simplemindedness
also characterizes theoretical mathematics, though to
a lesser extent.
Since science tries to deal with reality, even the
most precise sciences normally work with more or less
imperfectly understood approximations toward which
scientists must maintain an appropriate skepticism.
Thus, for instance, it may come as a shock to mathe-
maticians to learn that the Schrodinger equation for
the hydrogen atom is not a literally correct description
of this atom, but only an approximation to a some-
what more correct equation taking account of spin,
magnetic dipole, and relativistic effects; and that
this corrected equation is itself only an imperfect
approximation to an infinite set of quantum field-
theoretical equations. Physicists, looking at the
original Schrodinger equation, learn to sense in it the
presence of many invisible terms in addition to the
differential terms visible, and this sense inspires an
entirely appropriate disregard for the purely technical
features of the equation. This very healthy skepticism
is foreign to the mathematical approach.
Mathematics must deal with well-defined situa-
tions. Thus, mathematicians depend on an intellectual
effort outside of mathematics for the crucial specifica-
tion of the approximation that mathematics is to take
literally. Give mathematicians a situation that is the
least bit ill-defined, and they will make it well-defined,
perhaps appropriately, but perhaps inappropriately.
In some cases, the mathematicians’ literal-mindedness
may have unfortunate consequences. The mathema-
ticians turn the scientists’ theoretical assumptions, that
is, their convenient points of analytical emphasis, into
axioms, and then take these axioms literally. This
brings the danger that they may also persuade the
scientists to take these axioms literally. The question,
central to the scientific investigation but intensely
disturbing in the mathematical context—what
happens if the axioms are relaxed?—is thereby
ignored.
The physicist rightly dreads precise argument, since
an argument that is convincing only if it is precise
loses all its force if the assumptions on which it is
based are slightly changed, whereas an argument that
is convincing though imprecise may well be stable
under small perturbations of its underlying
assumptions.

21. The author discusses computing machines in the
first paragraph primarily in order to do which of
the following?
  (A) Indicate the dangers inherent in relying to a
   great extent on machines
  (B) Illustrate his views about the approach of
   mathematicians to problem solving
  (C) Compare the work of mathematicians with
   that of computer programmers
  (D) Provide one definition of intelligence
  (E) Emphasize the importance of computers in
   modern technological society

22. According to the passage, scientists are skeptical
   toward their equations because scientists
  (A) work to explain real, rather than theoretical
   or simplified, situations
  (B) know that well-defined problems are often
   the most difficult to solve
  (C) are unable to express their data in terms of
   multiple variables
  (D) are unwilling to relax the axioms they have
       developed
  (E) are unable to accept mathematical
   explanations of natural phenomena

23. It can be inferred from the passage that scientists
make which of the following assumptions about
scientific arguments?
  (A) The literal truth of the arguments can be
  made clear only in a mathematical
  context.
  (B) The arguments necessarily ignore the
  central question of scientific investigation.
  (C) The arguments probably will be convincing
  only to other scientists.
  (D) The conclusions of the arguments do not
  necessarily follow from their premises.
  (E) The premises on which the arguments are
  based may change.

24. According to the passage, mathematicians
   present a danger to scientists for which of the
   following reasons?
  (A) Mathematicians may provide theories that
  are incompatible with those already
  developed by scientists.
  (B) Mathematicians may define situation in a
  way that is incomprehensible to scientists.
  (C) Mathematicians may convince scientists
  that theoretical assumptions are facts.
  (D) Scientists may come to believe that
  axiomatic statements are untrue.
  (E) Scientists may begin to provide arguments
  that are convincing but imprecise.

25. The author suggests that the approach of physi-
   cists to solving scientific problems is which of
   the following?
  (A) Practical for scientific purposes
  (B) Detrimental to scientific progress
  (C) Unimportant in most situations
  (D) Expedient, but of little long-term value
  (E) Effective, but rarely recognized as such

26. The author suggests that a mathematician asked
   to solve a problem in an ill-defined situation
   would first attempt to do which of the following?
  (A) Identify an analogous situation
  (B) Simplify and define the situation
  (C) Vary the underlying assumptions of a
  description of the situation
  (D) Determine what use would be made of the
  solution provided
  (E) Evaluate the theoretical assumptions that
  might explain the situation

27. The author implies that scientists develop a
   healthy skepticism because they are aware that
  (A) mathematicians are better able to solve
  problems than are scientists
  (B) changes in axiomatic propositions will
  inevitably undermine scientific arguments
  (C) well-defined situations are necessary for the
  design of reliable experiments
  (D) mathematical solutions can rarely be
  applied to real problems
  (E) some factors in most situations must remain
  unknown

ouymUID: 2109118

楼主，我缺下面这些文章及题目，能不能给我传一个上来！最好是word版的，直接贴上来不好打印！谢谢！

9月24日：NO.6-1-4
9月25日：NO.6-2-4
9月26日：NO.6-3-4
9月27日：NO.7-1-4
9月29日：NO.7-3-4
9月30日：NO.8-1-3，NO.8-1-6

另外，楼主不必在意人数的多少，哪怕就咱们两人也可以！别人不来也不代表放弃，每个人都会有自己复习方法！楼主加油！

mapingUID: 204985

大家加油啊！我这两天病了，好点再和你们一起奋战！

wsdegUID: 199069

楼主，我来啦:)
这两天还真没顾上阅读，因为发现做题时，词汇就好像没被似的，郁闷死了:L
今天跟上你们吧！
:handshake

wsdegUID: 199069

No 5-2-2

短阅读：
新老观点对比型
正文：两个层次initially....    Nevertheless, even now....
ts:新观点出现处one cannot avoid the conclusion that the eight romances are only one work

具体分层次：
1.initially,... a sense of relief and unpleasant
接下来分别用一句话说明(1)explain away(2)however
需要注意的词汇：once, however, reaction to

2.nevertheless,even now...
词汇:not disagreeing, but reject implications

题目：
17 ts处 错选d了，首先应该搞清作者态度:mad:
18 I.they are as separate as the works of a modern novelist是rejected 的
II.taken as one work 是新观点，找到第二层次，感觉对应的就是refined
III.有文章篇幅也看出来了:lol
19. 题干：concede
定位ts: refined but legitimate
20定位于reaction to
错了，一开始没有找到对应！！


长文章：层次更清晰了，三段照应首句,即ts
atomic /nuclear/ subnuclear
21.ts
22.radioactivity that occurs naturally on Earth
23.应该很清楚了
24.题干：atomic realm回文定位
e选项我觉得属于干扰选项里的“无“的那种，smaller 是相对体积而言的吧，我不是学化学的，但是plasma会不会比atom 还小呢？
25.做错了，回文中定位gluons，想得过于细节了，反倒乱了:(
26.最后一句
27.题干conditional elementarity是文中加引号的名词，标记！

ouymUID: 2109118

楼主及各位xdjm
我今天在坛子里看到了一个将xdf《GRE阅读理解教程》与no.题、国内题对照的贴子。发现《教程》里的题就是后两者的集合，只不过打乱了顺序而已。然后我又发现那其中的no.题我已经全部做过了，难怪我这两天总遇到做过的题。因此，我不能继续按照楼主订的计划跟大家一起复习了。我决定开始做国内题了！

祝各位好运！