寄托天下 寄托天下
查看: 1613|回复: 1

[未归类] arg4总觉得不对味,诚恳地请XDJM们指教  关闭 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
30
寄托币
828
注册时间
2008-9-30
精华
0
帖子
5
发表于 2009-3-3 17:07:09 |显示全部楼层
Giving suggestions about which real estate firm to choose, the author argues that Adams does overwhelmingly better than Fitch, therefore anyone who want to sell their home quickly at a good price should use Adams. Scrutiny of his evidences here, however, reveals that none of them lend credible support to his conclusion.


First of all, the author points out that many of Fitch’s agents are only part-time, not mentioning about the relevant information of Adams. Even if agents of Adams work full-time, which is the most possible in this case, we cannot conclude that Adams actually does better than Fitch. Maybe Fitch runs more effectively, or the industry can reach the best point in cost benefit analysis if employees work part-time. Lacking evidences to rule out these possibilities, the author cannot draw any conclusion over this issue.



As to the revenue behavior, Adams’ overall larger revenue does not necessarily indicate its stronger competence than that of Fitch. It is well known that profit of a company is more representative than revenue to evaluate the firm competence; therefore without data relating to management cost, the author cannot convince me that Adams really does better than Fitch. Even if we admit that revenue can explain something, the per agent revenue of Adams, however, falls far behind of that of Fitch. Besides, market behavior of these two firms last year may not be representative enough to support the author’s argument, for it is entirely possible revenue of Fitch was always higher than that of Adams with the exceptional case last year. Therefore, the suggestion remains unconvincing.



Finally, two experiences on selling houses of the author lend weak support to the conclusion. It could be the case that the location of his first house 10 years ago is much worse than that of his second house, leading to more time for Fitch to sell it. And it is also possible that the demand of second hand houses 10 years ago is relatively too small to the demand last year. Yet, there are no these information in his remarks. Without considering these factors, the author arbitrarily believes that Fitch should be responsible for the ineffectiveness of the whole trade process, on which his conclusion mainly depends. Unless the author put forward more details about his different experiences with these two firms, we are still unconvinced that we should use Adams if we have a house to sell.


In sum, the author’s remarks in this discussion are not trustable enough to offer real suggestions in our decision making when we are confronted to the similar situation. Only a more detailed information about these two firms to the point and more specific descriptions about his own experience, can we be convinced that Adams really is more professional that Fitch, or the opposite.
回应

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
4149
寄托币
29807
注册时间
2008-11-24
精华
20
帖子
1432

荣誉版主 QQ联合登录 备考先锋 AW活动特殊奖 AW作文修改奖 IBT Smart Virgo处女座 US Applicant Sub luck

发表于 2009-3-3 17:08:19 |显示全部楼层
请按照这个https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/thread-813674-1-1.html改一下你的题目,然后PM我解锁
平生太湖上,短棹几经过,于今重到何事? 愁比水云多。拟把匣中长剑,换取扁舟一叶,归去老渔蓑。银艾非吾事,丘壑已蹉跎。
脍新鲈,斟美酒,起悲歌:太平生长,岂谓今日识干戈!欲泻三江雪浪,净洗胡尘千里,无为挽天河。回首望霄汉,双泪坠清波。

使用道具 举报

RE: arg4总觉得不对味,诚恳地请XDJM们指教 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
arg4总觉得不对味,诚恳地请XDJM们指教
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-923510-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部