- 最后登录
- 2011-1-14
- 在线时间
- 285 小时
- 寄托币
- 313
- 声望
- 5
- 注册时间
- 2009-5-17
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 4
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 245
- UID
- 2641450
- 声望
- 5
- 寄托币
- 313
- 注册时间
- 2009-5-17
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 4
|
本帖最后由 GG86_Fly 于 2009-6-2 09:17 编辑
Language, which is the possession of only human, is a complex system of symbols for us to communicate with each other. We learn (inherit) it from our ancestors, and will pass on (transmit) it to our offspring (posterity). However, researches conducted by the United Nations indicate that more than half of the some 6,000 languages spoken in the world today are under threat. Thus we must appeal the governments to take efficient measures to save (safeguard) these endangered languages.
Local languages are in danger of dying out as the speakers have gradually turned to a more dominant language. There are many factors that speed the local languages loss. One is man-made factor such as colonialist government and big-nationality chauvinism.
The House of Hapsburg once forced thee Jewish people to speak german in order to make them get rid of their past, convention and language and become the loyal subjects of the ruler. European colonialism made English as the dominant language in North American and Africa, and the colonial ruler imposed their culture and value on the local residents thus made the local language disappear. The other reason is that we have put too much emphasis on globalization. When people communicate with other people of different nations, they find it is much easier if they use the dominant languages, such as English, Chinese, and Russian and so on. They rarely use their own language, and their children are not being educated to use the local language that is not widely used. As fewer and fewer people speak the native languages, they gradually die out. Except for the above reasons, public education, economic globalization, the mass media and the Internet are the other factors that speed the rate of languages loss.
It is difficult for such people who speak a dominant language to understand the feelings about the loss of a language. Such people would think it is a good trend that so many people are speaking the same language. In fact, it is the loss and a big threat to the whole world .First of all, language is representative of the behaviors and custom of a region. Different languages are on behalf of different cultures. For example, we have adventive words “Kung-fu” from China and “Yoga” from India, they introduce a brand new aspect of the magic world to us. So does some endangered languages, they have the same effect like a kaleidoscope that will enrich our feeling and knowledge of our society from different views. When a language dies it is a vision of the world that disappears. Another reason is that single language is always associated with repression and violence. An authoritarian government always requires its subjects speak an official language, and forbids some local languages as a form of rule. When theses languages are in danger of dying out, we are facing our own danger in losing diversity and survival adaptability.
From what is mentioned above, it is clearly that preventing such languages from becoming extinct is very important. As we have already admitted that a language is a product of the behaviors and custom of populations of people, it can not be achieved by only a small group of people, who speaks an endangered language but without other people communicating with them. So we need a nation that treats it as its own treasure to preserve it. Government is the main force to preserve these languages. Firstly, the government should educate its people that every language is equal, that is to say, every language is deserved to be spoken and learned. Secondly, the government should improve legislation, develop bilingual education in residential areas for ethnic minorities
and increase finaical investment. Moreover, the government should also support anthropological linguistics, which can sufficiently preserve endangered languages.
Facts have already proved that we are on our way to prevent endangered languages. It needs time to see the efforts. But it is an optimistic prospect that some languages would revive and show us different views and attitudes of the world. |
|