41# xiemeng2370
ISSUE221 - "The chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history."
WORDS: 551
TIME: 00:45:00
DATE: 2010-2-4 10:15:01
提纲:
论点:尽管人们研究历史的根本目的是为了改善现在的社会,可是同时它也可以消除人们认为不同时代人基本上完全不同这个错误的观念
主一:分论点:研究历史可以让我们发现不同时代的相同之处从而消除认为不同的错误观点。
例1:老师教我们各种历史事件,让我们明白人们的共同追求是公平,和平
例2:研究社会的进程:封建-君主-民主,让我们明白人们的共同追求是自由
主二:分论点:飞速发展的科技蒙住了人们的视线,但其实不同时期的技术虽然不同,但是人们的根本目的还是相同的:让生活变得更加美好
例:先进技术导致教育形式不断变化,但是本质上都是为了让学生能够更有效的学习到先进的知识,使得我们社会的将来能够更好的发展
主三:分论点:但是在艺术文化领域,越是研究历史,越会发现不同之处
例1:现在人们被涌现出的过多的流行文化淹没,而宝贵的古典文学正在逐渐消失,我们越是研究,就越会发现当代文学与古典文学的巨大不同
例2:古代艺术纯粹是为了表现自然地想法,而现代的流行艺术,尤其是电影,音乐,却是为了赚钱。我们越是研究,越会悲哀的发现艺术的根本目的正在被那些功利主义者改变
结尾:除了一些特定领域的研究,比如艺术文化之外,我同意作者的观点,它也可以消除人们认为不同时代人基本上完全不同这个错误的观念,并且这些研究可以使我们的生活和社会更好的发展
Do people in one period of time are dramatically different from people who lived at any other time in history? Do people study of history is premarily (primarily) for break down that illusion?(语法错。) Yet(YET不是这样用的,去掉) the basic notion of people studying history is thoroughly look back in order to better(也别这么用
有的词活用看着很舒服,有的词不是) our current society, but I agree with the speaker's contention that this study could ruling(语法错) out people's illusion that people in every period of time is significantly different and this is also one of the most important function.(最后一句太长,拆开。) 开头没有硬伤,只是话稍微罗嗦了点儿。入题不快。 To begin with, studying history could renders(同样的语法错误,这是第二次还是第三次了) us to understamd (understand) the similarity between every differnt (different) period of time, so that eliminate the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history.(这是你这一段的第一句。句子太长,不上口,而且这句话只是把ISSUE重复了一遍而已。不能算是一个论证方面。) Our every day experience informs me(慎用ME) that studing (studying) history is one of our foundamental (fundamental) subject at school.(学术一点儿,成熟一点儿。这里看上去好像小学生诶。) History teachers would like to teach us the historical events(TEACH AN EVENT. 换换) and associate with current matters in order to make students understand the nature(语法错) desire of people, seek for just and peace.(语法错) It is similar to the reform of our policy which seems greatly distict (distinct) in every period of time- feudal society, monarch society and democratic society- at first blush. However, if we could throughly (thoroughly) research every period and pass through(CHINGLISH了) those superficial differences to focus on the essence.(标点错) We may easily discover that every period of people are(语法错:are去掉) all desire and fight for the nature sense- freedom, and those changes of politics are due to this humans nature sense. 1.
提纲当中,你说的例一例二,在实际行文中只是方面一和方面二而已。没有看到例子。如果没有办法拿出具体的人名事件名团体名等等,就等于没有拿出例子。请自行积累。 2.
语言效率不高。请加大容量,减少点儿废话。 Moreover, some people argu (may argue) that looking back for history have no means may because they are masked by the advanced technology, so that overlook humans common sense of seeking for a well-bing (well-being) society.(这一段以【some people】开头,不大好。而且你的TS中也没有将其观点阐释清楚。换言之,你提出的SOME PEOPLE的观点实在是太脆弱了:【我们有了技术,我们就可以不学历史啦!】这种观点驳斥的味道不那么大,对吧。如果这个TS就有点儿不知所谓地提出这样一个诡异观点,下面就必然是对这一诡异观点的驳斥,而这一段就都没有味道了。) Aithough (Although) our science is in contant (constant) flux(in flux是啥= =) in every contemparay (contemporary) time, the essence of those changes may just for the reason that we desire to better(x) our life and improve our society. For instance, some people claim that our education is dramatically changes(语法错) in every period of time due to the change of our educational avenue. However, if we deeply research the improvment (improvement) of educational system, regardless the change of educational equipment, we could find that the change of our educational measure serves to give students effective and qualitical (quality) education in order to make sure our society would have a bright future. 咱们从FOR INSTANCE开始看。 (叹)教育。在任何一个时代都是一方面树人,一方面愚民的。作为政府来看,目标不会变。 但是在你的文章中,从FOR INSTANCE开始,some people是谁没有说,他们的观点极其不清楚。而且他们说的“教育随时代而改变”,指的是具体的教学制度。他们也不会去质疑目标吧。教育制度与理念有着日新月异的变化,时代的冲击不仅仅是技术上的辅助。技术这个东西,不仅是我们查字典可以不用手翻而是用电子字典这样简单的事情;它会彻彻底地深入你的骨髓,改变你的理念。 这个问题在你的文章里看来不止一次了。什么问题?假想敌问题。 你的假想敌水平似乎都不是很高嘛。如果要假想出一些人,提出了异议,然后你把他们一一驳倒,这种写法其实不错。但是你的假想敌提出的观点不清不楚,你的辩驳也是不明不白。这样一来一去虽然很容易撑起字数,但是真的没什么味道。 While it would be tempting to concede that people in different period of time virtually have some different (differences) such as culture and arts, and with studying deeply, people would be likely to found that difference more and more huge.(语法错。Huger) For example, with the development of our Internet and the globalnization (globalization), our culture and arts are gravely changed.(这不是for example。) People are emerage (immersed) in a plethora of so-called popular culture and pop arts, but omit so many treasours (valued) culture and arts.(非常不地道,非常别扭。) The culture and arts in history are continuously disappearing and dramaticaly (dramatically) changing. And the more we study of our history culture and arts, we may somewhat pain (sorrily) found that those changes are significantly different. For example, the previous arts are almost represent the nature sense of artists, but current arts, especially those popular movies and pop music are published for the mere reason that make money.(孩子,我不得不说,这个一方面是你的偏见,另一方面纯粹是扯淡中的扯淡。刚才看到这行字儿心头一颤右手一抖你知道么。真是平地起惊雷……如果俺是考官,你已经挂了。拜托说话之前过过脑子。【流行文化和CURRENT ART是一个东西么。】
确实有很多人说电影已死,有人说现代音乐走进了死胡同,有人说唱片业遭遇了很大危机——但是你这样的理念,只能说明你对流行文化与先锋现代艺术两个巨大的领域都完完全全没有任何的SENSE) (再还有哈,语法错。) Thus, the basic purpose of arts is regrettably changed by utilitarian. 看到这里我要说的话很简单: 不懂别瞎说,你会死得很惨。对现代艺术没有了解可以,但是即使你说的话是对的,也要想想【这句话放在卷子上“会不会很像”一个纯粹的“偏见”】。 啊看了这里我真都不想再看下去了= =语法错误可以忍
拼写错误你的态度也挺好都改过来了
但是言之凿凿的纯偏见真是忍不了啊啊啊啊! 这段的论述结构我就不多说了。老问题,我没有看到你任何一个例子。 In conclusion, besides the study history of some special areas such as culture and arts, I strongly agree with the speaker's claim that studying history could eliminate our illusion that people are significantly different from every period of time and find the basis of humans need, and those studies could much more benefit to better our society.
结尾不说了,不说了…… |