作文本1.21更新到今天！(低落)

yxb_25UID: 2758094

4.7 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have a friend who is smart than to have a friend who is humorous.)


Nowadays, there is a heat discussion with sharply soaring volume about friends. Some individuals hold the view that people should make friends with humorous people. However, from my perspective, it is better to have a smart friend than a humorous friend. My reasons are as following.


To begin with, a smart friend can help us to obtain knowledge. A smart friend will bring a host of knowledge to equip us, which can assist us to make a progress during the time when we are studying. For example, Richard who is my best friend is a very clever student. （my best friend Richard who  is a very clever student)
Every times he can complete his math test quickly and correctly, which make most of people believe that he is a math(mathematical ) genus(genius). Since my math is my deficiency, Richard always helps me to solve math(mathematical )
problems, and then instruct me how to deal with those problems. Richard is so smart that he not only teaches me how to cope with the(去掉） math(mathematical )
problems but also tells me a great deal of science knowledge. It is because of that
his efforts of teaching me math that my math scores become higher and higher. Comparing with Alice who is one of humorous my friends(语序变一下Compare to one of my humorous friends Alice ), I believe smart Richard will
give me more helps.


In addition, a smart friend can find out your mistake and then help us to improve. It is universally acknowledged that every people make mistakes. Once the mistake cannot be amended in time, it will bring more loss in our life. Therefore, we need a smart friend to give a correct advice which can help us to overcome our faults. In contrast with a smart friend, it is a difficult task for a humorous friend to finish, in that a humors friend must be too positive and careless to seek our mistakes, even mentioning to point out or advise us. Hence, it is certain that smart friends are better than humorous friends.
(感觉LZ利用 humorous friend 来证明自己观点的理由比较牵强）

Nevertheless, it is widely admitted that a humorous friend can give us happiness and a good mood, but a smart friend also can bring us happiness, because he are （he are??惊讶！)very smart. A smart friend can know how to make jokes with us, so a smart friend can do what a humorous friend do. However, a humorous friend cannot share knowledge and precise advices.


In a nutshell, based on what I have mentioned above, I assert that It is better to have a friend who is smart than to have a friend who is humorous.


看完LZ的文章总感觉有点怪，很多语法和词汇用法LZ 写的时候都没有注意，有空希望LZ能再回顾一下文章改写试试，佩服一下LZ的毅力，加油啊！

s499992008UID: 2688967

Nowadays, there is a heat discussion with sharply soaring volume about friends. Some individuals hold the view that people should make friends with humorous people. However, from my perspective, it is better to have a smart friend than a humorous friend. My reasons are as following.
) q0 l( S% p( U
0 l. C( s5 A+ L$ u6 \6 P; s' J9 R; P7 \To begin with, a smart friend can help us to obtain knowledge. A smart friend will bring a host of knowledge to equip us, which can assist us to make a progress during the time when we are studying. For example, Richard who is my best friend is a very clever student. Every times he can complete his math test quickly and correctly, which make most of people believe that he is a math genus. Since my math is my deficiency, Richard always helps me to solve math problems, and then instruct me how to deal with those problems. Richard is so smart that he not only teaches me how to cope with the math problem （这句倒装多好啊 so smart is richard that ....）but also tells me a great deal of science knowledge. It is because his efforts of teaching me math that make (这段是强调句吧)my math scores become higher and higher. Comparing with Alice who is one of humorous my friends, I believe smart Richard give me more helps. - y: V; d- m3 M7 f7 v

7 \3 N. d9 e  x6 aIn addition, a smart friend can find out your mistake and then help us to improve. It is universally acknowledged that every people make mistakes. Once the mistake cannot be amended in time, it will bring more loss in our life. Therefore, we need a smart friend to give a correct advice which can help us to overcome our faults. In contrast with a smart friend, it is a difficult task for a humorous friend to finish, in that a humors friend must be too positive and careless to seek our mistakes, even mentioning to point out or advise us. Hence, it is certain that smart friends are better than humorous friends.8 e) A6 Z& _5 @1 N. M! z
5 k: G% J- g7 V5 P, t- e4 d/ C* h
Nevertheless, it is widely admitted that a humorous friend can give us happiness and a good mood, but a smart friend also can bring us happiness, because he are is very smart. A smart friend can know how to make jokes with us, so a smart friend can do what a humorous friend do. However, a humorous friend cannot share knowledge and precise advices(这个结论不太好吧。。).
4 b# l4 H3 k# t8 n; r( E7 J* {3 G! [9 P  v
In a nutshell, based on what I have mentioned above, I assert that It is better to have a friend who is smart than to have a friend who is humorous.（楼主的开头真是百年都不变那。。。）

lain0119UID: 2695504

今天我解脱了一定会补上的!!!!!!

joyicecreamUID: 2447185

4.9 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give every member of the team the same grade when the team finishes a project.
) `$ V9 z2 d) A; }# P. x/ z* C

Nowadays, there is a heated discussion with sharply soaring volume about whether universities should give every member of the team the same grade when the team finishes a project. Some individuals agree with the statement, holding the view that universities should give every member of the team the same grade. However, from my perspective, Universities should not give every member of the team the same grade. My reasons are as following. " p6 Z+ y1 c9 b+ c1 y
: l; m4 v6 c7 Z% _


To begin with, As we all know, grades play a very crucial role in students' academic careers, so every students student desire to gain a better grade. From my experience, a project is made by a few members and members (变成who从句更好)cannot divide the project like cutting the cake. So, it is certain that some people spend a host of time and energy on the project, in contrast, some people may be nothing to do on the project.(换成do nothing in the project) When the team finishes a project, the result is that Universities give every member of the team the same grade. In the situation, the people who spend a host of time and energy must feel unfair, which maybe lead him to lost interest on other projects. For example, I prefer to work a project by myself, because I used to spend many time and energy on group project. But I met some students ignoring the project, which has nothing to do with the project. Now, I dislike be any group projects' participant. Therefore, universities should not give every member of the team the same grade.

' A8 h8 N* O) h2 `: f$ V3 }
In addition, when universities give every member of the team the same grade, it is lucky for the people who has nothing to do with the project. The people will more and more depend on other people rather than himself. Since grade is one of the most important measurements for（of） students, universities cannot easily give every member of the team the same grade, especially those students who have nothing to do with the project.

In a nutshell, based on what I have mentioned above, hardly can I agree with the statement that universities should give every member of the team the same grade when the team finishes a project.
层次不是很清楚~~跟我写的有点像~加油咯！

lain0119UID: 2695504

Nowadays, there is a heated discussion with sharply soaring volume about whether students at university should pick up the most difficult courses even if they cannot get top grades in them. Some individuals disagree with the statement, arguing that students should not take the most difficult classes. However, from my perspective, students should choose the hardest courses even though they cannot get top grades in them(其实这三句话彼此之间有很大一堆语句是重合的,不如简练点?!). My reasons are as following.

To begin with, taking the most difficult courses will instruct an unique skill which most of people(most people 或者是most of the people) cannot possess. Since those courses are the most difficult, it is certain that students can own a special ability when they finish courses(这个逻辑说不过去？！）. For example, there is a hard course called English writing which is taught by a very serious professor in our university. Last year, I took the course. The course was so difficult that students must finish a 300-word essay in every class. Except that, the professor also regulated us to read a host of passages. Many people dropped the course in the first week. I still remember I had four classmates when I entered the classroom in the second week. Until I got a C rank in the course, I have found I improve my English grammar, writing, and vocabulary very much which give me foundation for preparing the TOEFL test（这句话太诡异）. Therefore, if I had not taken English writing course, I would never have grasped English writing skills. Even though I got a C rank in English writing class, the course give me the real English knowledge（这几句整合成直到我选了那课并通过了考试后我才发现我英语的各方面能力提高了，尽管我只得了C）

In addition, the most difficult courses will bring the spirit of perseverance. Once a student desires to obtain a top grade in the most difficult courses, it is necessary for him to constantly denote his time and energy to the course. In other words, he will learn the spirit of perseverance during the time when he studies the course. （这里最好加个连词）The spirit of perseverance plays a crucial role in our future. Without the spirit of perseverance, Edison did not invent the filament after trying thousands of materials. Without the spirit of perseverance, Bell cannot invent the phone. Without the spirit of perseverance, Einstein cannot find the nuclear energy. Hence, the spirit of perseverance will bring profound influence on every people's success. Even though students get a "F" in the most difficult course, it is still worthy for them to take the course, because they can learn the spirit of perseverance（这句话要加个限定条件，他们努力了）.

Nevertheless, I should admit that the most difficult classes indeed bring a host of drawbacks such as low GPA and costing a lot of free time. But, comparing（compared） with a unique skill and the spirit of perseverance, those drawbacks should be ignored.

In a nutshell, based on what I have mentioned, I agree with the statement that students at university or in college should choose the most difficult classes even if they cannot get top grades (marks) in them.

意见已经给在上面了，今天，不，昨天的作文大大地杯具了，以至于我现在无语凝噎了。。。
lz好生加油，我非常佩服你的毅力！！！

peterandmzUID: 2756308

4.10 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades (marks) encourage students to learn. Nowadays, there is a heated discussion with sharply soaring volume about whether grades can encourage students to learn. Some individuals agree with the statement. However, from my perspective, grades cannot spur students to learn. My reasons are as following
L To begin with, the reason why people come to universities is various. Some people want to get a degree to hunt a suitable job, and other people are attracted by science and knowledge. I believe no one will enter universities to get a good mark, because grades are one of standards for measure what students have learned in universities. For example, when Einstein who is one of the most famous scientists in the world was a student in the university, he always showed his talent and interest on science. Even though Einstein constantly gained A in many courses, he still insisted to study during his college life. From Einstein’s case, we can conclude that grade is unimportant for those students who really desire to denote their time and energy to science. Grades also cannot encourage those students who want to hunt a suitable job in that only skills and experience can assist them to complete their goals rather than grades. There is no double that no boss will care how many A his employees obtained in the university. Therefore, grades cannot spur students to learn. In addition, even though grades encourage students to learn, how long its effect will last? There is news I recently heard. A top students killed by himself, because his posthumous papers told us that he loved the feeling when he got A in one course. Buy when he got a job, he cannot get any self-confidence from grades, which lead his suicide. From the news, I consider grades' function can exert on the students who lack of self-confidence. Actually, those students are not the people who really like studying. 5 M& W# A& }. G% G0 |1 U&  
\ In a nutshell, based on what I have mentioned, hardly can I agree with the statement that grades encourage students to learn.
楼主文章不错，用词不落俗套，只有几个拼写的错误，还有一个就是我觉得应该是grede is one of the standards for ..... 而不是greades are one of .....前面是复数后面跟个one可能不对吧 还有就是第二个例子，自杀那个，我觉得不是很切题

bruce520UID: 2634940

Nowadays, there is a heated discussion with sharply soaring volume about whether grades can encourage students to learn. Some individuals agree with the statement. However, from my perspective, grades cannot spur students to learn. My reasons are as following,
To begin with, the reason why people come to universities is various. Some people want to get a degree to hunt a suitable job, and other people are attracted by science and knowledge. I believe no one will enter universities to get a good mark, because grades are one of standards for measure what students have learned in universities. For example, when Einstein who is one of the most famous scientists in the world was a student in the university, he always showed his talent and interest on science. Even though Einstein constantly gained A in many courses, he still insisted to study during his college life. From Einstein’s case, we can conclude that grade is unimportant for those students who really desire to denote their time and energy to science. Grades also cannot encourage those students who want to hunt a suitable job in that only skills and experience can assist them to complete their goals rather than grades. There is no double that no boss will care how many A his employees obtained in the university. Therefore, grades cannot spur students to learn.【这一段的论点我觉得过于激进了，全盘否定grades的作用貌似不太客观啊，起码这种制度目前仍在盛行，而且给你下文的让步造成尴尬的境地，呵呵，你觉得了？】
In addition, even though grades encourage students to learn, how long its effect will last? There is news I recently heard. A top students killed by【by可以不要】 himself, because his posthumous papers told us that he loved the feeling when he got A in one course. Buy【啥子意思咧】 when he got a job, he cannot get any self-confidence from grades, which lead his suicide. From the news, I consider grades' function can exert on the students who lack of self-confidence. Actually, those students are not the people who really like studying.
R2 w6 s- r& a- q* P! r) L
In a nutshell, based on what I have mentioned, hardly can I agree with the statement that grades encourage students to learn.[这种结尾方式（From the above discussion, we can safely draw a conclusion that +抄一下题目）力劝楼主以后别用了，我也是今天上完课刚被告知的。]
楼主的实力展开能力太强了，实在佩服哈。不过可能行文逻辑上没考虑的太细，我觉得哈。
对了，再问楼主一件事，今天去新东方上完课，老师说让我们去看他们总结的一个机经，据说考题必从里面出，不知道和2楼的无老师题库是不是一致的呢，楼主如果觉得有必要比较一下我可以发给你。

bruce520UID: 2634940

Nowadays, there is a heated discussion with sharply soaring volume about energy. Some individuals hold the view that fossil fuels will not be replaced by renewable sources. However, from my perspective, renewable sources will replace fossil fuels. My reasons are as following.
* M5 v* D/ u4 G% r% e. f
: a# V) }* d; [To begin with, it is universally acknowledged that fossil fuel is limited. According to a survey from University of Virginia, some professors and experts point out that oil will be used out in 50 years; coal can provide us energy for 80 years; left gas may support our life for 100 years. All of conclusion has revealed the prediction that fossil fuels will be wiped out in 100 years. If we cannot discover other source to replace fossil fuels in 100 years, it is certain that the day ending the world will be come true, because our economy is totally established on the energy fossil fuels exert. Hence, fossil fuels are bound to be replaced in human society.( p( k& ^( ?0 p  i* r
/ y" ^& Z' G. r1 C! S9 e
In addition, thank to the hard working and researching of scientists, we have found renewable sources which are the only answer for solving the problem of insufficient fossil fuels. There is a great difference between renewable sources and fossil fuels that renewable sources will constantly engender the energy which satisfy our demands. The difference also is the reason why renewable sources can play the role fossil fuels playing in our society. In group to confront with the situation that fossil fuel will be disappeared in 100 years, we should realize that developing renewable sources is the only choice for dealing with the problem. Especially in recently, there is a【an】 irrefutable fact that many countries devote a large amount of their talents and funds to invest renewable sources, which entirely manifests the tendency that renewable sources of energy will replace fossil fuels. 8 t' B+ _! y! K

  _6 {/ q' U) m3 ?& q/ @Nevertheless, it is widely accepted that we still have much troubles in the road of developing renewable sources, but following with the repaid development technology and science, we will invent a host of machines and devices to take advantage of renewable sources at most.
) Q2 X0 a) J0 z1 b3 x5 \, J5 F7 r! K# y+ M( U, s& r# f- K
In a nutshell, based on what I have mentioned, I deem that renewable sources will soon replace fossil fuels.
已经和官方范文的格式趋于一致，厉害。主要是我观点和你不一致爱哈

bruce520UID: 2634940

Nowadays, there is a heated discussion with sharply soaring volume about traveling. Some individuals hold the view that the best way to travel is a group led by a tour guide. From my perspective, I totally agree with their opinion. My reasons are as following.
, t1 |2 y( ?0 M2 `) y- ]( u
5 n2 D7 n" _6 [) L3 |To begin with, traveling by a tour guide will bring a host of benefits to travelers. A tour guide can constantly tell travelers a large amount of information and background about the traveling place. For example, last year I went to China. During my China trip, I learned a host of Chinese history and culture from the Chinese guide. If I had not traveled by a tour guide, I would have obtained much information and knowledge about China. Therefore, the best way to travel is lead by a tour guide.: `: X% n0 W/ i0 [7 i

* U% `' e# ]: X6 ]- R5 n- QIn addition, traveling by a tour guide can save travelers' time and energy. It is universally acknowledged that travelers need much time to arrange their trips' plans before they start their traveling. But now our studying and working pressure becomes more and more serious, who is willing to spare the time to make a trip plan? The answer to solve the problem is that to find a tour guide. Once travelers have a tour guide, they will not worry about trip plans. Not only the trip plan can traveler acquires from a tour guide, but also a tour guide can recommend them to visit special places. Hence, traveling by a tour guide is the best way.
1 }2 ~/ p/ ~: C1 u
% l" r3 s6 _1 S9 f3 E4 RNevertheless【这个词该是让步的时候用才对啊，我觉得严重不妥在这】, traveling in a group lead by a tour guide will make trips safer and safer, because a tour guide is an experienced local people who are familiar with everything in the place. Furthermore, traveling in a group makes travelers to heip each other when any person is in emergency. 4 F9 r+ Z- N  j* h% I$ u, s1 f) s
- v: N& Y1 V! H- a3 f$ v
In a nutshell, based on what I have mentioned, I believe that the best way to travel is in a group lead by a tour guide.

你一共练了多少了，竟然接近拼写0错误，实在佩服。不过这是一个四要素的问题，涉及group tour和非group tour，那在论证过程中采用TOPIC + A+ + A+ + A+ +TAIL的模式貌似太过片面，总得来点B-才能算得严谨，当然如果是两要素折中方案无可厚非。