求组argument223的攻击点。。。。。。。。。。。。

condarcyUID: 2920913

223.The following appeared as an editorial in one of Coleville's city newspapers.

"Even though a high percentage of Coleville City's businesses failed last year, we who live in Coleville City should keep in mind the fact that the Coleville region has attracted a great many new businesses over the last three years. It is well known that new businesses are, on average, much more likely to fail than are long-established ones, so the business failures should not be considered a sign of poor economic health. Indeed, many analysts regard the presence of a significant number of new companies among a region's businesses as a sign of economic health. Thus Coleville City appears to be in good, not poor, economic shape."

尽管Coleville市有很大比例的商业去年失败了，居住在Coleville市的人们应该记住这一事实：Coleville地区在过去三年中吸引了大量的新商业。众所周知平均而言，新商业比有一定历史的行业更容易失败，因此去年的商业失败不应该被看作是经济状况变坏的迹象。相反，很多分析家把一个地区商业中的大量新公司的存在看作是经济健康的标志。因此Coleville市的经济状况是良好的。


我找不到攻击点啊  感觉逻辑挺顺畅的。。。。。囧。。。。。

咖啡盐UID: 2973669

"Even though a high percentage of Coleville City's businesses failed last year, we who live in Coleville City should keep in mind the fact that the Coleville region has attracted a great many new businesses over the last three years. It is well known that new businesses are, on average, much more likely to fail than are long-established ones, so the business failures should not be considered a sign of poor economic health. Indeed, many analysts regard the presence of a significant number of new companies among a region's businesses as a sign of economic health. Thus Coleville City appears to be in good, not poor, economic shape."

文章里只说了去年大量公司倒闭，没说是新公司.....


过去三年吸引了大量新公司进驻，可是今年不一定有.....可能今年完全没有，反而倒闭了不少，那么专家的话正好映证了CC经济不景气


这个average是怎样的average?全国的？大范围的？是否能适用于CC？


这篇没看过，暂时就发现这么些个....