- 最后登录
- 2017-8-16
- 在线时间
- 1805 小时
- 寄托币
- 29103
- 声望
- 1556
- 注册时间
- 2010-12-13
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 1063
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 21427
- UID
- 2973669
  
- 声望
- 1556
- 寄托币
- 29103
- 注册时间
- 2010-12-13
- 精华
- 2
- 帖子
- 1063
|
发表于 2012-1-30 17:35:36
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 咖啡盐 于 2012-1-31 11:18 编辑
6# sgmjk
Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
非常感谢斑竹!
In modern society,advent of a myriad of metropolis indispensably symbolize both strength and prosperity in a state.【重复】As positions of a nation's metropolis become more significant than ever,the issue of whether Governments should responsibilities 【注意语态】to invest more on major cities 【or not】seems to be intricate and complicated just as much as a nation's cultural institutions and traditions remain protected and developed largely in those cities.【病句,as much as 所伴随的是前一句话题,而不是城市的地位;另外,intricate 和 complicated重复,完全是一个意思。】I tend to disapprove of both the claim and the reason because there are alternative towns and cities to stimulate cultural thriving.
【逻辑上自相矛盾】
In the first place,it is impossible to fully disapprove of the claim.After all,metropolis of a country necessarily direct and guide country's path to develop.To clarify,it is not uncommon that blooming education always springs from main cities.An apt illustration evolves in Beijing which takes the position of capital city in China.In fact,Beijing cultivate a relative glut of excellent universities and colleges within the whole nation including Beijing University as well as Qsinghua University,both of which stays renowned and outstanding in the world.On the other hand,great accomplishments in a country hinges on value and honor in its main cities.To illustrate,also in Beijing,2008 Olympic Games was once successfully held,which attracting hundreds of thousands foreigners' eyes over the world.Therefore,by doing this,an increasing number of individuals gained opportunities to know and appreciate this ancient and civilized country.【这段主题是什么?看划线句是说城市引导国家的发展,但是论据力度不够。第一处关于教育方面,清华北大国际知名,这对国家的教育有什么作用?教育太片面了,如果要上升到国家的层次,教育同样要升华成为文化事业。再一个,如果看了LZ第一句话,会联想到政府在主要城市建设的投入力度上,但之后的论证于此处关系并不紧密。等于该段LZ给予了两个主题:1、为什么claim不全对,2、城市如何引导国家发展。】
Nevertheless,small cities,towns,and even village need sufficient patronage from Government in order to qualify gap between rich and poor.Particularly in small countries,officers could never turn a blind eye to those have-nots who work and live toughly in impoverished areas.Consider,the land of Africa,for example,there are still more than two millions people suffering from impoverishment,starvation and fatal diseases.【病句】Undoubtedly,to ensure and support their fundamental lives remains the Government's initial and unshakable obligation.Another less egregious illustration evolves in China,which lives in more than four hundred millions farmers.Indeed,those farmers mainly from small countryside are still destitute of food and clothes.【本段论证本身没什么大问题,但是就该题目而言同样没有答在点上。题目着眼于城市与民族文化的关系上,按照题目的逻辑城市承载着传统文化,那么政府就应该支持。如果LZ想以小城镇来论述部分地不赞同,同样应该按照题目的脉络来论述;小城镇同样承载着传统文化,甚至很多情况下小城镇比大城市更加传统,由此小城镇所承载的传统文化岂不是更加浓重?那么投入的力度不是更加要大么?贫困问题与题目没有直接联系。】
On the other hand,【on one hand...on the other hand...,没有one,哪来的the other呢?】though with reluctance,【没有人逼你...】I would still partially agree with the reason.【LZ什么时候被说服了?从disapprove成了partially agree了?】Unarguably,owing to the fact that those international cities exposed to diverse culture and civilization widely and deeply,they could help transmit their own cultural characteristic to the world.To illustrate this point,I can never think of a better example than Expo 2010 in Shanghai.The exposition provide a best stage for cultural communication among Asia,Europe,Africa,South America and so forth,which preeminently display Chinese culture including long history and charming customs to the rest of the earth.【例子明明是赞成的....上海作为中国的一个大城市,展示了中国的历史悠久的文化风俗...不就是reason么?如果划线句是本段中心的话,那么LZ你就偏了。题目没有要求讨论城市是否承担着传播文化以及文化交融的问题。reason要讨论的只是城市是否产生并承载着一个民族的传统文化。与传播和推广无关。】
Nonetheless,to overlook the fact that cultural relics and institutions in metropolis are vulnerable to disappear is somewhat unwise.Conversely,freeing from invasion of global culture as well as influence of modern establishment,small cities have easier access to safeguarding their valuable cultural heritages.Indeed,according to the statistics drawn from a recent survey,more than one thousand cultural relics particularly in large cities vanish every year.
To put it in a nutshell,despite vital importance of financial support in large cities,it is also equally crucial to fund small ones.Only by essentially protecting and developing culture both in metropolis and small cities can a cultural nation ultimately thrive.
基本上偏了
Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
题目的关系:城市是一个民族传统文化主要的发源地,所以政府要确保主要城市的财政投入促繁荣。
两个同意:你是否同意民族文化是从城市开始发祥的?你是否同意繁荣发展的同时文化不会受到影响?
政府为什么要确保主要城市的建设?因为这些城市承载着民族的传统文化,所以才要促进这些城市的繁荣。但如果这样的建设会破坏这些本身存在的传统文化的话,那促进这样的建设是否可取?
本篇个人觉得就是讨论现代化建设与传统文化之间的关系,没必要去扯太多有的没的。小城镇的建设投入可以作为body第三段的一个补充更为合适。
另外LZ写作还有一个问题,每一段的总起太拖沓,为什么总是要写一句没有任何实质性意义的话语? |
|