- 最后登录
- 2017-2-2
- 在线时间
- 20 小时
- 寄托币
- 54
- 声望
- 50
- 注册时间
- 2016-2-5
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 7
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 71
- UID
- 3691088
- 声望
- 50
- 寄托币
- 54
- 注册时间
- 2016-2-5
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 7
|
7.25日占楼
1. 个人基础
考过T 25分,然后也考过雅思是6.5,但是因为自己想申请的项目比较偏academic方向,所以要求是最好能到5,准备了一周左右也不知道自己的水平到底如何。
2.具体问题
主要是时间问题,一般需要一小时才能达到450字左右,写作过程中感觉自己强迫症很严重,必须要完善每个句子,所以时间很拖延。
另外具体来说Argument和issue都习惯于在每段开头把所有观点列出,这样的话导致后面分论点的展开可能出现重复问题,因此不知道是不是段首句应该在宏大一点。另外就是三段大的观点比较容易想出,但分论点的提出比较难,应该是展开和例子的累积不够?
3. 请提供一篇AW
Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
1. 中心论点:Although it is undeniable that the availability of jobs do matters in making determination on the field of study, I think that inner desire is of the most significance.
TS1:On personal level, as in most cases people are likely to do jobs relevant to their field of study in university for a considerably long period and even for the whole life, interests and talents contribute to their passion being maintained, curiosity being continued and capability being ensured.
TS2:On societal level, the advance of a healthy society requires eminent people in a variety of field of study rather than merely those so-called prevailing areas.
TS3: However, though I support the argument that college students are supposed to weigh their intrinsic preference over job availability, the statement indicating that talents and interests are the only things to be focused goes beyond rations.
因为是第一次参加评分,所以也把全文贴出,希望如果王老师有时间的话能看下除论证逻辑外,是否在语言方面能有所提高,以及想要拿到5分还需要做出怎样的努力!谢谢!
The intensive competition in job market has aroused dispute on the choice of field of study in universities. Talents ad interests are emphasized by many people, claiming that college students are supposed to adhere to their heart when decide on their majors. While on the contrary, the serious reality make the others suggest the students to be more practical and focus more on areas which are welcomed by the employers. Although it is undeniable that the availability of jobs do matters in making determination on the field of study, I think that inner desire is of the most significance.
On personal level, as in most cases people are likely to do jobs relevant to their field of study in university for a considerably long period and even for the whole life, interests and talents contribute to their passion being maintained, curiosity being continued and capability being ensured. The opposite view taking the practical needs as the measurements ignored the emotional factors which are essential to boost people’s potentials. That is to say, interest affects a lot when a student is learning his favorite discipline and stimulates him to devote to researching and exploring, while the same person might easily give up undesired course in front of obstacles even if occupations relating to it are in great need. Meanwhile, both in scholarship and employment process, ability to apprehend related knowledge and obtain critical skills is the key element in measuring people, without talents, students must make extra endeavors to cacth up their gifted classmates, and some of they may even eventually fail in becoming the top one. Seldom people like Leanardo da Vinci are adept at every area, as a result, to be outstanding in job market is on the basis of dedicating to the field of study which is personally loved and appropriate.
On societal level, the advance of a healthy society requires eminent people in a variety of field of study rather than merely those so-called prevailing areas. Students studying chemistry may find that few jobs are available in those professional companies, while research institutions, medicine factories and universities are open to any passionated graduates. Similarly, some fields of study, like sociology, seems irrelevant to any specific positions, whereas students foster capability in logic reasoning, critical thinking and creativity in their study, which in turn helps them postrude among their peers in interviews. In addition, the availability of jobs is not immutable. Taking economics, which is definitely the most respected, the wealthiest and the most welcomed field of study regarded by many people, as the instance, although students learning it are indeed popular in employment when the economy is prosperous, they cannot survive the period when economic deflation comes, stock market plumps and they get dismissed.
However, though I support the argument that college students are supposed to weigh their intrinsic preference over job availability, the statement indicating that talents and interests are the only things to be focused goes beyond rations. For the students, they are hard to truly define their interests and talents, both of which are changeable and abstract respectively. Moreover, the high unemployment rate should not be ignored and the promising career future comes from integration of evaluation on self-capacity and position absences. The two arguments both go towards extremity, leading college students neglecting balance on dreams and reality.
In conclusion, talents and interests must primarily evalued in terms of selecting a field of study, considering its stimulating function and versatility requirement. While the college students are not supposed to disregard the reality In fact, as college students are unaware of how to combine their hobbies and potentials to the need of job market, education institutions especially universities are responsible to be the guide, enabling them make great choice for their bright future.
|
|