9月PEBBLE互改小组

ChunyanLi2005UID: 2124266

第二次考G
我们的宗旨：通过互改，提高大家的AW的成绩！
我们的目标：AW>=5
我们的任务：
1。每人每天至少完成一篇Issue,两天一篇argument。题目由成员讨论而定（就相当于作业了），自己的其他习作也可以发上来互改。根据个人情况，限时或不限时，但是要注明。
2。大家必须将前一天的作文传上（希望只要发上来就是自己认真改过一次的，不然是浪费大家的时间，对自己效率也不高）。作文传到主页，本帖后面只跟链接，将整篇作文跟到本帖后面者则可以不予修改。

3。每人每天发几篇至少就要改几篇（除自己的外），至于每次谁批改谁的文章，由大家自行选择修改的对象，但是在决定修改对象后首先要在对象后跟贴“占座”，表示你会修改此文章。最后可以一个人的文章被多人改。如果出现没有改的文章时由我指定谁来改。
4。小组要是有成员不能到，必须向小组说一声！
PS：自己的文章帖上来前，请先自己修改，避免语法错误过多……

有意见请大家提出。

本组成员：组长：Chunyanli2005  
            
               组员：1. Chunyanli2005  4楼
                                        shenzhenhua   9楼
                                         lxmsos             13楼                     

                                      公告栏（不定时更新）
********************************************************************

现在还有几个人了？
size=-1]大家注意了  下面是作业！[/font]
8月20号作业
法律：Issue  17
argument 235 ( 共30次 八月出现5次)
argument  （选做）同主题105

8月21日作业
政治：Issue  69
argument  7
8月25日作业
教育：Issue51/ Issue50
8月26日
argument 51
8月29日
政治家问题issue43  （同样类的还有issue169）
argument4
8月30日
历史类issue48
issue70
argument38
8月31日
Issue70
Argument147
9月1日
Argument140
Issue130
9月3日
Issue185
Argument169
9月7日
Issue56
Argument147

[ 本帖最后由 ChunyanLi2005 于 2006-9-7 16:48 编辑 ]

ChunyanLi2005UID: 2124266

【ISSUE 分类】
From 飞跃重洋 by feiba

点击此处链接

今日Issue:
185. "Scandals—whether in politics, academia, or other areas—can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could."

185. 丑闻，不管是政治、学术还是其他领域，都能发挥有利的作用。它们让我们以不同的角度去看待问题，而这些是演讲者和改革家不能带给我们的。



1、  政治丑闻

2、  学术丑闻

3、  其他领域：艺术，Machal Jackson

大家怎么想这篇文章?
我觉得对我来说,这个不太好写,尤其是政治  艺术领域的丑闻
Watergate
Under the relentless prodding of Judge John J. Sirica, one of the Watergate burglars began to tell the full story of the Nixon administration’s complicity in the episode. James W. McCord, a former CIA agent and security chief for the Committee to Reelect the President (CREEP), was the first of many informers and penitents in a melodrama that unfolded over the next two years, which mixed the special qualities of soap opera and Machiavellian intrigue. It ended in the first resignation of a president in American history, the conviction and imprisonment of twenty five officials of the Nixon administration, including four cabinet members, and the most serious constitutional crisis since the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson.
UNCOVERING THE COVER-UP The trial of evidence pursued by judge Sirica, a grand jury and several special prosecutors, and a televised Senate investigation headed by Samuel J. Ervin, Jr., of North Carolina, led directly to the White House. No evidence surfaced that Nixon had ordered the break-in or that he had been aware of plans to burglarize the Democratic National Committee. But from the start Nixon was personally involved in the cover-up, using his presidential powers to discredit and block the investigation. Perhaps most alarming was the discovery that the Watergate burglary was merely one small part of a larger pattern of corruption and criminality sanctioned by the Nixon White House.
The White House had become committed to illegal tactics in May 1970 when the New York Times broke the story of the secret bombings in Cambodia. Nixon, by nature a man possessed by insecurity, had ordered illegal telephone taps on several newsmen and government employees suspected of leaking the story. In 1971, during the crisis generated by the publication of the Pentagon Papers, a team of burglars under the direction of White House advisor John Ehrlichman had broken into a psychiatrist’s office in an effort to obtain damaging information on Daniel Ellsberg, the former Pentagon employee who had supplied the press with the secret documents. By the spring of 1972 Ehrlichman commanded a team of “dirty tricksters” who performed various acts of sabotage against prospective Democratic candidates for the presidency, including falsely accusing Hubert Humphrey and Sen. Henry Jackson of sexual improprieties, forging press release, setting off stink-bombs at Democratic gatherings, and associating the opposition candidates with racist remarks.
The cover-up unraveled further in April 1973 when L. Patrick Gray, acting director of the FBI, resigned after confessing that he had confiscated and destroyed several incriminating documents. On April 30 Ehrlichman and Haldeman resigned, together with Attorney-General Richard Kleindienst. A few days later Nixon nervously assured the public in a television address: “I’m not a crook.” But new evidence suggested otherwise. John Dean, whom Nixon had dismissed as presidential counsel, testified before the Ervin Committee and a rapt television audience that Nixon had approved the cover-up. In another “bombshell” disclosure a White House aide told the committee that Nixon had installed a taping system in the White House and that many of the conversations about Watergate had been recorded.
A year-long battle for the “Nixon tapes” then began. The Harvard law professor Archibald Cox, whom Nixon had appointed as a special prosecutor to handle the Watergate case, took the president to court in October 1973 to obtain the tapes. Nixon, pleading “executive privilege,” refused to release them and ordered Cox fired. In what became known as the “Saturday Night Massacre,” the new attorney-general, Elliot Richardson, and his deputy resigned rather than execute the order. Cox’s replacement as special prosecutor, Leon Jaworski, proved no more pliable than Cox, and he also took the president to court. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the president must surrender the tapes. A few days later the House judiciary Committee voted to recommend the three articles of impeachment: obstruction of justice through the payment of “hush money” to witnesses and withholding of evidence; using federal agencies to deprive citizens of their constitutional rights; and defiance of Congress by withholding the tapes. But before the House of Representatives could meet to vote on impeachment, Nixon handed over the complete set of White House tapes. On August 9, 1974, fully aware that the evidence on the tapes implicated him in the cover-up, Richard Nixon resigned from office.
EFFECTS OF WATERGATE Vice-president Spiro Agnew did not succeed Nixon because Agnew himself had been forced to resign in October 1973 when it became known that he had accepted bribes from contractors before and during his term as vice-president. The vice-president at the time of Nixon’s resignation was Gerald Ford, the former minority leader in the House, whom Nixon had appointed with Congressional approval, under the provisions of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment (1967). Ford insisted that he had no intention of pardoning Nixon, who was still liable for criminal prosecution. “I do not think the public would stand for it,” predicted Ford. But a month after Nixon’s resignation the new president issued the pardon, explaining that it was necessary to end the national obsession with the Watergate scandals. Many suspected that Nixon and Ford had made a deal, though there was no evidence to confirm the speculation. President Ford testified personally to a congressional committee: “There was no deal, period.” But suspicions remained.
If there was a sliver lining in Watergate’s dark cloud, it was the vigor and resiliency of the institutions that had brought a president down the press, Congress, the courts, and an aroused public opinion. The Watergate revelations provoked Congress to pass several pieces of legislation designed to curb executive power in the future. The War Powers Act (1973) required presidents to consult with Congress before sending American troops into combat abroad and to withdraw troops after sixty days unless Congress specifically approved their stay. In an effort to correct abuses of campaign funds, Congress enacted legislation in 1974 that set new ceilings on contributions and expenditures. And in reaction to the Nixon claim of “executive privilege,”
Congress strengthened the 1966 Freedom of Information Act to require prompt responses to requests for information from government files and to place on government agencies the burden of proof for classifying information.
The nation had weathered a profound constitutional crisis, but the aftershock of the Watergate episode produced a deep sense of disillusionment with the so-called “imperial presidency.” Coming on the heels of the erosion of public confidence generated by the Vietnam War, the Watergate affairs renewed public cynicism toward a government that had systematically lied to the people and violated their civil liberties, said one bumper sticker of the day: “Don’t vote. It only encourages them.”
Nixon’s resignation pleased his critics but also initiated a prolonged crisis of confidence. A 1974 poll asked people how much faith they had in the executive branch of government. Only 14 percent answered “a great deal”; 43 percent said “hardly any.” Restoring credibility and respect became the primary challenge facing Nixon’s successors. Unfortunately, a new array of economic and foreign crisis would make that task doubly difficult.

[ 本帖最后由 ChunyanLi2005 于 2006-9-4 21:27 编辑 ]

winsome_luoUID: 2146848

SIGH, 俺23号就考了, 来不及了, 不过还是要顶一下:)

ChunyanLi2005UID: 2124266

再次决战哈尔滨
qq:316046875
作业贴：
argu235 阿狗还是很弱 限时完成不了， 大家狠拍！
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... e%3D1#pid1768989151
Issue69 互拍互拍！
http://210.51.167.66/bbs/viewthr ... &extra=page%3D2
Issue26
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... e%3D1#pid1768975842

以前写的：
Issue51
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
Issue144
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
Issue99
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... e%3D1#pid1768937148

Argument 51 有点难啊！:L
http://210.51.167.66/bbs/viewthr ... &extra=page%3D1
Issue17  终于冥思苦想 挤出点想法了，希望大家多给点意见，多提点想法，谢谢！
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
8月29日
Issue43
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
Argument4
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
8月30日
Argument38
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
9月1日
Issue48
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
9月5日
Issue130
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
9月7日
Argument169
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
9月8日
Issue56
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
9月10日
Issue131
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D4

[ 本帖最后由 ChunyanLi2005 于 2006-9-10 18:10 编辑 ]

nkbluemouseUID: 200665

nkblue
决战九月四号，长沙
人民大学的
一定全力以赴！！


第一次作业 issue 17 大家拍拍。。。

[ 本帖最后由 nkbluemouse 于 2006-8-20 23:15 编辑 ]

zorrowangUID: 2184100

11号哈尔滨考
qq：185254689

galliumUID: 2218419

我也加一个吧，9月14，北京，qq:82872555

shenzhenhuaUID: 2241271

gtid:shenzhenhua
9.19武汉考
QQ: 390137123
水平较菜，大家共勉！！！！！！！！

argument235
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
用时太长了，还有格式不知道有没有问题，请大家帮忙改改，谢谢~~
issue17
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D101
argument42
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
issue69
http://210.51.167.66/bbs/viewthr ... &extra=page%3D1
感觉issue69很难写，老是把握不好论点，真诚希望多拍拍
确实觉得孙远有些提纲不咋的
ChunyanLi2005 的作业我刚拍了，前几天gter上不去到现在才互拍，不好意思，写得很不错啊，好好学习！
issue51问题很多的一篇
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D4
issue7
http://210.51.167.66/bbs/viewthr ... &extra=page%3D1
issue70
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
argument38
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
issue43
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
另外，大家听说过在标点两边加空格增加字数的说法吗（上月上新东方老师说的，但看上去挺危险）

[ 本帖最后由 shenzhenhua 于 2006-9-3 19:46 编辑 ]

fingerliUID: 2130195

考试日期:  8.30

地点:      harbin

QQ:       170261009


所在大学： 哈尔滨工业大学


呵呵，快该考了，没多少时间，不过加入算了

yyyangziUID: 2244126

我也要加入 大连 8.31
组长快组织吧时间不多了

chenchenfooUID: 2156822

奶咖的作业：
8月20日：
ARGUMENT17
8月21日
Argument7

[ 本帖最后由 chenchenfoo 于 2006-8-22 16:24 编辑 ]

lxmsosUID: 2133854

第一次作业： Issue17    https://bbs.gter.net/thread-518471-1-1.html

                      Argument235      https://bbs.gter.net/thread-519773-1-1.html
第二次作业：  Issue69       https://bbs.gter.net/thread-520057-1-1.html

                     Argument7    https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1

                     8.29   Issue43 https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
                     8.30Aegument38   https://bbs.gter.net/thread-521512-1-1.htmlhttps://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
                     8.31  ......coming   怎么刚写几篇就平台期？ 越写越恶心！
                            BTW， 感谢组长的努力呀！ 从新看看范文再回来！
                     9.1    Issue130  https://bbs.gter.net/thread-523044-1-1.html
                     9.3 补篇Argument  Argument147 https://bbs.gter.net/thread-523760-1-1.html
                      9.5  Issue185    https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1

[ 本帖最后由 lxmsos 于 2006-9-5 17:45 编辑 ]

wellboyUID: 2192985

呵呵，下午我看的时候发现你们小组成立了，只有四个人。我以为没戏了，所以就把我加入的帖子删了，没想到晚上来看这么多人，晕！还能不能加入啊？

nkbluemouseUID: 200665

人是挺多的，就希望大家要积极交作业啊！

lxmsosUID: 2133854

谢谢组长大人！
我看人已经差不多了，不用再等了吧，开始布置作业吧！