【DriftKing】总结经验教训，再战托福日志

DriftKingUID: 2664045

1-并列-2-递进-3
1-递进-2-转折-3
1-转折-2-递进-3
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... hlight=&page=28

DriftKingUID: 2664045

75# kathryn慕云

你小我这么多 还自称姐姐。。。

DriftKingUID: 2664045

in case of; if
give rise to, lead to, cause, incite
momentum
spearhead  
rainy day
mix up, confused
prevalent
eye-opener 令人眼开的新奇或美丽事物; 一次所饮的酒
roughly approximately probably
radical
infrastructure
fraternity
chore
intensify
set forth
scrub
germ
doom-and-gloom 前景暗淡, 无望

airkxUID: 2721388

ZHICHI YIXIA

kathryn慕云UID: 2638683

猪妞加油↖(^ω^)↗。。。。

zyuan12UID: 2625480

能坚持的小孩最后一定走向胜利~
加油~

DriftKingUID: 2664045

Should the government focus more on preserving nature environment and less on economic development?



Before talking about which side should government pay more attention, nature environment or economic development, I want to emphasize what is the government's primary responsibility at first, that is "develop our society sustainable". So I think both protect nature environment and economic development are important equally.

Consider we pay more attention on save natural situation and ignore some development on economic. Obviously, we can receive more fresh water, clean air, active animals, however, we should also meet the pressure of economic depression. Under that situation, government would not have enough tax revenue to cover the running cost, companies would cut down the payment for works and even lay off some to reduce the cost. Those laid off would experience a hard time as they could receive little from the burdened government. The unemployment crisis would further evolve into a vicious cycle and engender severe social problems such as robbery, murder.

on the other hand, if we completely focus on economic development and ignore our surrounding environment, the outcome can be even more disastrous. There will be more factories than today, more emissions we will have which contain carbon dioxide in it. Greenhouse effect will be intensified which cause the situation we live in warmer and warmer than ever before. A lot of bad effects will follow, such as the coastal land would be inundated beneath the elevated sea level, climate changes or we can only see the snow through TV in the future, less food we can eat, so more and more people will be threaten by not enough food. Is money also useful at that time, can we buy more region from sea, or buy snow from the sky or even buy food from the earth? The answer is quite definite,so it is so terrible to underestimate the important of preserving nature environment.

Above all, we can not focus less on one while choose the other as the emphasize to develop, we must find a more flexible, feasible and sustainable way to progress our society. For example, we can try our best to preserving the natural situation while we can ensure the economy develop at a slow speed.

liuxiaoyinUID: 2631993

Should the government focus more on preserving nature environment and less on economic development?

Before talking about which side should government pay more attention, nature environment or economic development, I want to emphasize what is the government's primary responsibility at first, that is "develop our society sustainable（sustainably）". So I think both protect（ing） nature environment and economic development are important equally.论点提得很好······

IConsider we pay more attention on save（ing） natural situation（natural situation会不会有点奇怪···source？） and ignore some development（s） on economic（economy）. Obviously, we can receive more fresh water, clean air, active animals, however, we should also meet the pressure of economic depression. Under that situation, government would not have enough tax revenue to cover the running cost, companies would cut down the payment for work(er)s and even lay off some to reduce the cost. Those laid off would experience a hard time as they could receive little from the burdened government. The unemployment crisis would further evolve into a vicious cycle and engender severe social problems such as robbery, murder.逻辑性很强，说理充分···


on the other hand, if we completely focus on economic development and ignore our surrounding environment, the outcome can be even more disastrous. There will be more factories than today, more emissions （we will have
删掉会不会好点） which contain carbon dioxide in it. Greenhouse effect will be intensified which cause the situation we live in warmer and warmer than ever before. A lot of bad effects will follow, such as the coastal land would be inundated beneath the elevated sea level, climate changes or we can only see the snow through TV in the future, less food we can eat, so more and more people will be threaten by not enough food.(such as之后接这么多句子会不会有点奇怪，感觉用for example会好点，我也不太确定,要不你再查查。
Is money also useful at that time, can we buy more region from sea, or buy snow from the sky or even buy food from the earth? The answer is quite definite, so it is so terrible to underestimate the important（importance） of preserving nature environment.

Above all, we can not focus less on one while choose the other as the emphasize（emphasis） to develop, we must find a more flexible, feasible and sustainable way to progress our society. For example, we can try our best to preserving(preserve) the natural situation while we can ensure the economy develop at a slow speed.

总评：很好，很流畅。你的行文思路很好，逻辑清晰，论述有力，学习了。注意一些小问题，语法的小错误还有词性的问题,你词汇量很大的说。。。。加油哈，你的论述文是我看过的写的不错的top 3,思路例子都很好。

P.S:对不起，这么晚才给你评，白天课超多````还有，谢谢你对我的鼓励，O(∩_∩)O哈哈
82# DriftKing

shirley072UID: 2712200

Before talking about which side should governmentpay more attention, nature environment or economic development, I want toemphasize what is the government's primary responsibility at first, that is "developour society sustainable" (that is后面应该是一个名词吧，建议sustainable development之类滴). So I think bothprotect nature environment and economic development are important equally.6 f: x, p) \( Y  p

Consider we pay more attention on savenatural situation and ignore some development on economic (这句话语法貌似没对，至少consider和pay就是分开的两个动词，并且我没有理解这句话想说的意思). Obviously, we can receive (？这个词用在这里是什么意思呢) more fresh water, clean air, active animals,however, we should also meet the pressure (主要是这个meet什么意思呢？觉得不太合适, 如果是遇见，可以用predict,如果是缓解，就用release)of economic depression. Under that situation, government would not have enoughtax revenue to cover the running cost, companies would cut down the payment forworks (workers?) and even lay off some to reducethe cost. Those laid off would experience a hard time as they could receivelittle from the burdened government. The unemployment crisis would furtherevolve into a vicious cycle and engender severe social problems such asrobbery, murder.7 r3 \4 H4 M* S+ P3 u

on the other hand, if we completely focus oneconomic development and ignore our surrounding environment, the outcome can beeven more disastrous. There will be more factories than today, more emissionswe will have which contain carbon dioxide in it(去掉).Greenhouse effect will be intensified which cause the situation
(so that或者其他，我一时也没有想起，但是cause与situation这样用貌似不搭呢)
we live in warmer and warmer than ever before. Alot of bad effects will follow, such as (such as后面应该是名词吧，并且后面跟了太多了，形式变化太多，就觉得such as用的不对了)the coastal land would be inundated beneath the elevated sea level, climatechanges or we can only see the snow through TV in the future, less food we caneat, so more and more people will be threaten by not enough (scarce) food. Is money also useful at that time (应该有if吧), can we buy more region from sea, or buy snow fromthe sky or even buy food from the earth? The answer is quite definite (definitely NO),so it is so terrible to underestimatethe important (importance) of preserving natureenvironment. & e& ]9 C3 g, ~# S" E
& P. J) t5 w: E3 v6 B0 B% p
Above all, we can not focus less on one whilechoose the other as the emphasize (这个是动词吧)to develop, we must find a more flexible, feasible and sustainable way toprogress our society. For example, we can try our best to preserving thenatural situation while we can ensure the economy develop at a slow speed.

整个文章楼主的意思应该是两个同等重要吧，但是读到最后一句话的时候，我突然有点迷惑。。保证经济低速增长的意思在我的理解就是不要太重视经济，因为我想不通为什么非常重视经济的增长的同时，又要控制它的速度呢。所以在我看来跟之前阐述的内容稍微有点冲突。并且最后一句话读起来也有点怪怪的，比如那个ensure

内容还不错啦，就是在用词和句子构建方面要注意呢：）

个人意见啦~~~~

DriftKingUID: 2664045

Successful people take new things and take risks rather than the thing that they've done well

Almost everyone want to be a successful man, but how to achieve this goal? Should we try new things or even take risks to success instead of do the things what we are good at? The answer is negative.

As some people thought, some famous person made some great success through try something new or take risk. Such as Steven Jobs who is the president of Apple Company, drop from Read College as an freshman and begin to produce Mac which is the first personal computer of Apple. This is really a big risk in most of the students' idea, for if he failed, he will receive nothing but waste his money and life in it. However, he success, may be his accomplishment immerse some people into the false appearance that successful people like to take risks.

The fact is, people can not always try something new or take risk, this is really a dangerous thought rather than a good one. Consider a pilot change the plane's route for some private or subjective reason, but it may cause a big accident at the same time, such as the plane fly into the thunder or hit other plane which are all big disasters. As an successful pilot, he should finish the task by following the designed route, and sending the passenger to the destination safely. So not every man adventure something in order to success.

Furthermore, even some famous persons also do some familiar things to finish their job well. Such as a person who want to be president, he must have a lot of similar politic experiences and some new ideas based on the experience, which can help him to win the people's confident. After this elevation, he would also do something which are similar with his past job.

So "successful people take new things and take risks rather than the thing that they've done well" is no true. In my opinion, most of the people are do some familiar things which can make them success.

DriftKingUID: 2664045

来自诸葛
第一遍：完整听一遍文章，然后做后面的题目（不要看答案）
第二遍：每一篇文章中，从第一个题到最后一题开始看题干，然后同步顺序听文章，注意利用题干关键词听文章定位。 然后再做一遍题目。 （做完后看答案，比较和思考和之前做题答案和自己理解的差距和差异）
第三遍：完整全文听读，留意听不懂的地方。
第四遍：看着原文，听录音跟读（以句子为单位进行查漏工作）。
第五遍：再听读。
第六遍：看着原文，听录音跟读（以单词和短语为单位进行查漏工作）。
第7遍：再跟读。

DriftKingUID: 2664045

顶一下 版主可别删了

gaofei323UID: 2588256

那我也帮你顶一下好了 呵呵

我是chineseladyUID: 2662783

给DK加油!!:victory: