- 最后登录
- 2011-10-2
- 在线时间
- 3 小时
- 寄托币
- 535
- 声望
- 2
- 注册时间
- 2004-12-21
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 3
- 积分
- 548
- UID
- 189984
 
- 声望
- 2
- 寄托币
- 535
- 注册时间
- 2004-12-21
- 精华
- 3
- 帖子
- 0
|
2003爱一个美女好难（续二）——GRE阅读最高境界终极跳
（序曲）
原本不想再继续了，太多的狗尾续貂已经让原先比较清纯的思路开始沾携俗华的污
垢，但是我在梦的回忆中时时被催醒，更有我的许多诚挚的好友不惜牺牲大量时间和
经历，向我垂询阅读之法，尽管我一再推荐他们可以上寄托板块，但是网络不直接交
流的劣势使得仅存有限的人坚持并领悟到了极高的境界。刚刚看完一部“经典”影片
的续集，《无间道》也终于有了第三集，但是我已经失去了原先期盼的惊喜。我开始
反而同情刘德华饰演的“刘建民”来，他想做个好人，但是没有人给过他机会，最后
更是陷入了“同事”的围捕算计中。我曾经坐在图书馆的阶梯上一整夜地想对自己失
败的薄弱感情基础做过弥补，但是为什么她不给我机会，为什么要一棒将我打入GRE的
无间地狱呢？我只是想在保证优异的前提下实现自己稳定的情感展望，我有错吗？
时间：2002年某天，集中突破前一个月
地点：2号教学楼8楼电梯口
人物：silentwings,美女及其老乡
老乡：她现在是我女友了，我想你以后不用再打扰她了！
S： 我想跟她单独谈一下，OK？
美女：有什么不好说的，快说，否则我走了！！
S：我一直想知道我有什么作错了，你不肯原谅我呢？除了那次我赌气要回了我借你的
词汇书？
美女：你认为现在问这个还有什么意义吗？S，你一直自以为是，靠着自己比我成绩好
想拴住我……
S：我没有……
美女：住口！你其实有什么了不起，不就是什么材料学院的三好生，二等奖学金获得
者吗，什么英语4，6级优秀，全国英语竞赛什么破奖，计算机二、三级什么优秀，全
国作文什么烂奖牌，还有……怎么样，自个美去吧！我不在乎，我差点有什么，我6级
这次过不了，就下次，我不会靠你的，懂吗？我根本就不喜欢你。明白
吗？？？！！！
S：我understand!
美女：给我说中文！别给我放洋屁！你还有什么话说，没话我走了！
S：我……
（美女依偎在其老乡怀里，不再回向这边）
S：没话了！最后祝你：Doing what you like is freedom, liking what you do is
happiness!
美女：我听不懂，走吧，Darling!
(…………)
时间：半个月后
地点：上海
人物：chimera, silentwings
C：你的英语确实不错！难句看上去掌握的不错啊！
S：哪里哪里！
C：不过实在稍欠火候，这样吧！跟我练“集中突破”吧！
S：我久仰你的大名！但是我想看看你到底有多牛！
C：我只是靠这个吃饭，没有必要向别人证明什么！
S：你知道名声这东西水分很多的，你至少让我知道这是个怎样的境界吧！
C：好吧！我跟你玩个游戏！我们就花7分钟解一篇65行8道题的LSAT，很宽松吧！OK？
要是完不成或作不到全对，我就退出江湖。否则，…………
S：7分钟？OK！
（7分钟后，一把水果刀斜插在桌子上,旁边搁着一个打火机）
C：你自己看着办吧！
S：不可能的！你一定作弊！事先肯定作过，一定是这样！我……
C：你舍不得的话，我帮你！没有代价的付出，怎么会练得到绝世的功夫！
S：不要啊！……
（啊！？…………）
（别了，家人！别了，我的朋友！别了，美女！别了，我的过去！……）
（GRE阅读全真解题之最终幻想版）
刚刚从梦中醒来，全身冲淋了一下，计算机还开着，我知道我还在继续！正如1年前的
那个夜晚一样，一个同样的声音对我说道：“Are you ready? Let’s go !” 不同的
是他是牛人，我始终是菜鸟，始终！
来自LSAT全真阅读NO9的一篇中等难度文章，与GRE阅读难度相差不是很大。下面我们
一起请看题：（强烈建议大家先自己掐时间解一下，然后对照后面我列出的参考标准
衡量一下你现在的水平和差距，再跟我一起过这篇文章。OK？Action!）
Directions: Each passage in this section is followed by a group of
questions to be answered on the basis of what is stated or implied in the
passage. For some of the questions, more than one of the choices could
conceivably answer the question However, you are to choose the best answer
that is the response that most accurately and completely answers the
questions and blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.
Any study of autobiographical narratives that
appeared under the ostensible authorship of
African American writers between 1760 and 1865
inevitably raises concerns about authenticity and
(5) interpretation. Should an autobiography whose
written composition was literally out of the hands
of its narrator be considered as the literary
equivalent of those autobiographies that were
authored independently by their subjects?
(10) In many cases, the so-called edited narrative of
an ex-slave ought to be treated as a ghostwritten
account insofar as literary analysis is concerned
especially when it as composed by its editor from
“a statement of facts” provided by an African
(15) American subject. Blassingame has taken pains to
show that the editors of several of the more famous
antebellum slave narratives were “noted for their
integrity” and thus were unlikely to distort the facts
given them by slave narrators. From a literary
(20) standpoint, however, it is not the moral integrity of
these editors that is at issue but the linguistic,
structural, and tonal integrity of the narratives they
produced. Even if an editor faithfully reproduced
the facts of a narrator’s life, it was still the editor
(25) who decided what to make of these facts, how they
should be emphasized, in what order they ought to
be presented, and what was extraneous or germane.
Readers of African American autobiography then
and now have too readily accepted the presumption
(30) of these eighteenth-and nineteenth-century editors
that experiential facts recounted orally could be
recorded and sorted by an amanuensis-editor,
taken out of their original contexts, and then
published with editorial prefaces, footnotes, and
(35) appended commentary, all without compromising
the validity of the narrative as a product of an
African American consciousness.
Transcribed narratives in which an editor
explicitly delimits his or her role undoubtedly may
(40) be regarded as more authentic and reflective of the
narrator’s thought in action than those edited
works that flesh out a statement of facts in ways
unaccounted for. Still, it would be naïve to accord
dictated oral narratives the same status as
(45) autobiographies composed and written by the
subjects of the stories themselves. This point is
illustrated by an analysis of Works Progress
Administration interviews with ex-slaves in the
1930s that suggests that narrators often told
(50) interviewers what they seemed to want to hear. If
it seemed impolitic for former slaves to tell all they
knew and thought about the past to interviewers in
the 1930s, the same could be said of escaped slaves
on the run in the antebellum era. Dictated narratives
(55) therefore, are literary texts whose authenticity is
difficult to determine. Analysis should reserve close
analytic readings for independently authored texts.
Discussion of collaborative texts should take into
account the conditions that governed their
(60) production.
14.Which of the following best summarizes the
main point of the passage?
(A) The personal integrity of an autobiography’s
editor has little relevance to its value as a
literary work.
(B) Autobiographies dictated to editors are less
valuable as literature than
are autobiographies authored by their subjects.
(C) The facts that recorded in an
autobiography are less important than the
personal impressions of its author.
(D) The circumstances under which an
autobiography was written should affect the
way it is interpreted as literature.
(E) The autobiographies of African Americans
written between 1760 and 1865 deserve more
careful study than they have so far received.
15. The information in the passage suggests that the role
of the “editor”(line 23-24)is most like that of
(A) an artist who wishes to invent a unique method
of conveying the emotional impact of a scene
in a painting
(B) a worker who must interpret the instructions of
an employer
(C) a critic who must provide evidence to support
opinions about a play being reviewed
(D) an architect who must make the best use of a
natural setting in designating a public building
(E) a historian who must decide how to direct the
reenactment of a historical event
16. Which of the following best describes the
author’s opinion about applying literary analysis to
edited autobiographies?
(A) The author is adamantly opposed to the
application of literary analysis to edited
autobiographies.
(B) The author is skeptical of the value of close
analytical reading in the ease of edited
autobiographies.
(C) The author believes that literary analysis of the
prefaces, footnotes, and commentaries that
accompany edited autobiographies would be
more useful than an analysis of the text of the
autobiographies.
(D) The author believes that an exclusively literary
analysis of edited autobiographies is more
valuable than a reading that emphasizes their
historical import.
(E) The author believes that the literary analysis of
edited autobiographies would enhance their
linguistic, structural , and tonal integrity.
17. The passage supports which one of the following
statements about the readers of autobiographies of
African American that were published between 1760
And 1865?
(A) They were more concerned with the personal
details in the autobiographies than with their
historical significance.
(B) They were unable to distinguish between
ghostwritten and edited autobiographies.
(C) They were less naïve about the facts of slave
life than are readers today.
(D) They presumed that the editing of the
autobiographies did not affect their integrity.
(E) They had little interest in the moral integrity
of the editors of the autobiographies.
18. Which one of the following words, as it is used in the
passage, best serves to underscore the author’s
concerns about the authenticity of the
autobiographies discussed?
(A) “ostensible”(line 2)
(B) “integrity”(line 18)
(C) “extraneous”(line27)
(D) “delimits”(line 39)
(E) “impolitic”(line 51)
19. According to the passage , close analytic reading of
an autobiography is appropriate only when the
(A) autobiography has been dictated to an
experienced amanuensis-editor
(B) autobiography attempts to reflect the
narrator’s thought in action
(C) autobiography was authored independently by
its subject
(D) moral integrity of the autobiography’s editor is
well established
(E) editor of the autobiography collaborated
closely with its subject in its editing
20. It can be inferred that the discussion in the passage
of Blassingame’s work primarily serves which one of
the following purposes?
(A) It adds an authority’s endorsement to the
author’s view that edited narratives ought to
be treated as ghostwritten accounts.
(B) It provides an example of a mistaken emphasis
in the study of autobiography.
(C) It presents an account of a new method of
literary analysis to be applied to
autobiography.
(D) It illustrates the inadequacy of traditional
approaches to the analysis of autobiography.
(E) It emphasizes the importance of the
relationship between editor and narrator.
Answers: D E B D A C B
标准：（速度） 5——8分钟 Excellent
9——14分钟 Good
15——18分钟 Average
19——22分钟 Poor
23—— Failed
(正确) 7个 Excellent
6——5个 Good
4个 Average
3个 Poor
2个——0个 Failed
怎么样？感觉是好？还是坏？现在你应该更清楚自己的努力方向了吧！好，休息一
下，给自己一点信心，然后我们一起来做这篇文章。记住，把刚才的记忆都掏空了，
我们要“心静如水”，待会儿只有作者的思想在你我心中流淌，作好灌输分析的准备
了没？开始了！
Any study of autobiographical narratives that
appeared under the ostensible authorship of
African American writers between 1760 and 1865
inevitably raises concerns about authenticity and
(5) interpretation. Should an autobiography whose
written composition was literally out of the hands
of its narrator be considered as the literary
equivalent of those autobiographies that were
authored independently by their subjects?
读完首句，知道是讲对于AA作家自传叙述的真实性和解释性两方面的置疑。注意
ostensible我们马上知道作者的态度是“怀疑”和“否定”。接着2句提出论点：两种
自传体是否等价？不用说了，等价还写什么狗屁文章来探讨？肯定不等价！好，那么
开始推理，不等价有三种情况：1.A比B好；2.A比B差；3.A有时比B好，有时比B差，需
另加外部条件限制。好了，很简单的推理吧！下面我们就看作者想要表达的是上面3种
的哪一种了？首段只要想到这个层面，我想下面的内容就可以读得飞快，因为我们心
中已经有谱，主旨已经把握，按照“边读——边想——边记”原则，我们在3秒钟之内
想清楚要考主旨题，答案特征就是上述3种结论中的一种。
(10) In many cases, the so-called edited narrative of
an ex-slave ought to be treated as a ghostwritten
account insofar as literary analysis is concerned
especially when it as composed by its editor from
“a statement of facts” provided by an African
(15) American subject. Blassingame has taken pains to
show that the editors of several of the more famous
antebellum slave narratives were “noted for their
integrity” and thus were unlikely to distort the facts
given them by slave narrators. From a literary
(20) standpoint, however, it is not the moral integrity of
these editors that is at issue but the linguistic,
structural, and tonal integrity of the narratives they
produced. Even if an editor faithfully reproduced
the facts of a narrator’s life, it was still the editor
(25) who decided what to make of these facts, how they
should be emphasized, in what order they ought to
be presented, and what was extraneous or germane.
Readers of African American autobiography then
and now have too readily accepted the presumption
(30) of these eighteenth-and nineteenth-century editors
that experiential facts recounted orally could be
recorded and sorted by an amanuensis-editor,
taken out of their original contexts, and then
published with editorial prefaces, footnotes, and
(35) appended commentary, all without compromising
the validity of the narrative as a product of an
African American consciousness.
2段开始就说编辑的自传被认为是“鬼文章”，后面有个“a statement of facts”，
引号出现代表引用或反语，那么现在是什么呢？还用问，肯定是反语。前面是“鬼文
章”，这样的文章能说真话吗？好，否了前面要讨论的真实性问题。继续读，发现后
面B这个人站了出来为之辩护了并且也来了段“”，这里我们从前面知道作者肯定是否
定，这里说是“内容真实”，主语又是B，显然是引用。LSAT的命题者真是用心良苦。
紧接的两句话把“”的作用理解考查得天衣无缝。既然作者是否定态度，下面肯定接
着就是驳斥吧！驳斥肯定是强转折，出现什么呢？强转折词！果然，后面20行来了我
们久候的however！后面讲作者否决的理由，注意一下是哪几个方面，可能考细节题，
哦！是关于对于moral integrity的缺乏。下面作者还不过瘾，再来个Even if，进一
步以让步的方式从反面来批它，说主观能动性始终掌握在编辑者手里，而读者呢，很
容易接受这种“重述”为事实，但是我们马上由too readily accepted the
presumption即在一定假设基础上建立这种想法的。这种假设就是of 后的内容，其实
我们马上知道这个假设就是一样东西转述后一定与原物等价，这个假设显然荒谬，
“道听途说” 的古训都讲了几百年了，老美到今天还没意识到，真蠢！看透了这点把
戏，你说LSAT难吗？这段作者就是说了authenticity的否定，先正说，再让步反着
说，并且说了之所以到今天一个看似简单的问题还要拿出来纠正的原因是基于一个可
笑的假设。弄到这里，你是作者，接下去你要说什么了，对了！interpretation的否
定！怀抱着这样的信念，我们读下去吧！
Transcribed narratives in which an editor
explicitly delimits his or her role undoubtedly may
(40) be regarded as more authentic and reflective of the
narrator’s thought in action than those edited
works that flesh out a statement of facts in ways
unaccounted for. Still, it would be naïve to accord
dictated oral narratives the same status as
(45) autobiographies composed and written by the
subjects of the stories themselves. This point is
illustrated by an analysis of Works Progress
Administration interviews with ex-slaves in the
1930s that suggests that narrators often told
(50) interviewers what they seemed to want to hear. If
it seemed impolitic for former slaves to tell all they
knew and thought about the past to interviewers in
the 1930s, the same could be said of escaped slaves
on the run in the antebellum era. Dictated narratives
(55) therefore, are literary texts whose authenticity is
difficult to determine. Analysis should reserve close
analytic readings for independently authored texts.
Discussion of collaborative texts should take into句，
(60) production.
3段一开头作者给出的是more authentic and reflective的正评价，作者态度肯定是
负的，那么不用
问又是让步。等什么呢？强转折词呗！果然，后面接着43行出现了期待已久的Still，
作者开始
否定上述提出的观点，说这种将两者等价的说法是naïve的，否定观点不言而喻！然后
举例支持
上述观点，拿WPA的例子，好！要是考in order to题，那么答案一定是说两样事物的
不等价，
不是the same status！后句作了个比较，其中有个僻词antebellum，知道什么意思
吗？不知道，
我告诉你……我也不知道。我不能查词典，但我知道这句话就是上句的同义转述，跟
上句意思
肯定是一样的。由If可知一定是反着将上句说了一遍。好！我们可以看到由下句的
therefore知
道作者的结论来了，屏气凝神，看看作者的结论是3个中的哪个。哦！原来是“难于决
定”。下
面是should即判断句，可能靠细节题，注意对象与细节特征词，发现是close
analytic readings和
independently.然后作者发现是为什么“难于决定”呢？作者说要考虑conditions！
好了，主旨就
是第3种结论，看情况决定A的地位！读完了文章，我们已经对所有的细节与层次结构
了然于
胸，1段作者提出论点，指出就两个角度讨论，然后2段开始批判authenticity的等价
性，3段开
始批判interpretation的等价性，最后作者提出结论3！整篇文章是“问题解决型”。
弄清了之后，
来吧，我们开始解题！争取30秒一个，我们刚才通读是花了4分钟左右。后面的题给的
比较规
范。
14.Which of the following best summarizes the
main point of the passage?
(F) The personal integrity of an autobiography’s
editor has little relevance to its value as a
literary work.
(G) Autobiographies dictated to editors are less
valuable as literature than
are autobiographies authored by their subjects.
(H) The facts that recorded in an
autobiography are less important than the
personal impressions of its author.
(I) The circumstances under which an
autobiography was written should affect the
way it is interpreted as literature.
(J) The autobiographies of African Americans
written between 1760 and 1865 deserve more
careful study than they have so far received.
14题，主题题，答案特征：结论3，视情况而定。浏览5个选项，（D）
circumstances，非常
好，代表“情况”，答案立刻选（D），15秒就行！
15. The information in the passage suggests that the role
of the “editor”(line 23-24)is most like that of
(F) an artist who wishes to invent a unique method
of conveying the emotional impact of a scene
in a painting
(G) a worker who must interpret the instructions of
an employer
(H) a critic who must provide evidence to support
opinions about a play being reviewed
(I) an architect who must make the best use of a
natural setting in designating a public building
(J) a historian who must decide how to direct the
reenactment of a historical event
15题，类比题，找特征，显然第一特征就是“转述作家”这个性质，看看哪个选项人
物的性质
有“转”即将一种东西重新塑造的性质。那么看主体动词，发现（E）的
reenactment，非常完美！
16. Which of the following best describes the
author’s opinion about applying literary analysis to
edited autobiographies?
(F) The author is adamantly opposed to the
application of literary analysis to edited
autobiographies.
(G) The author is skeptical of the value of close
analytical reading in the ease of edited
autobiographies.
(H) The author believes that literary analysis of the
prefaces, footnotes, and commentaries that
accompany edited autobiographies would be
more useful than an analysis of the text of the
autobiographies.
(I) The author believes that an exclusively literary
analysis of edited autobiographies is more
valuable than a reading that emphasizes their
historical import.
(J) The author believes that the literary analysis of
edited autobiographies would enhance their
linguistic, structural , and tonal integrity.
16题，作者态度题，简单吧！“怀疑”，“否定”的选项就是答案。（B）skeptical
非常好！只要看author后的主体词！
17. The passage supports which one of the following
statements about the readers of autobiographies of
African American that were published between 1760
And 1865?
(F) They were more concerned with the personal
details in the autobiographies than with their
historical significance.
(G) They were unable to distinguish between
ghostwritten and edited autobiographies.
(H) They were less naïve about the facts of slave
life than are readers today.
(I) They presumed that the editing of the
autobiographies did not affect their authenticity.
(J) They had little interest in the moral integrity
of the editors of the autobiographies.
17题，细节题，对象是读者，问假设是什么？当然是我们说的“不等价”假设罗！答
案是显然的，两个比较双方与关系都知道了，还可能错吗？
18. Which one of the following words, as it is used in the
passage, best serves to underscore the author’s
concerns about the authenticity of the
autobiographies discussed?
(F) “ostensible”(line 2)
(G) “integrity”(line 18)
(H) “extraneous”(line27)
(I) “delimits”(line 39)
(J) “impolitic”(line 51)
18题，作者态度题，就是找反映“怀疑否定”态度的词，看见（A）就是它了，一个贬
义词，正中下怀！
19. According to the passage , close analytic reading of
an autobiography is appropriate only when the
(F) autobiography has been dictated to an
experienced amanuensis-editor
(G) autobiography attempts to reflect the
narrator’s thought in action
(H) autobiography was authored independently by
its subject
(I) moral integrity of the autobiography’s editor is
well established
(J) editor of the autobiography collaborated
closely with its subject in its editing
19，细节题，找到题干中的close analytic reading在原文中的定位，我们发现在末
段的倒数第2句，由independently找到答案（C）。前面我们也已经注意到了这个判断
句的重要性，使得细节题的出现早在意料之中。
20. It can be inferred that the discussion in the passage
of Blassingame’s work primarily serves which one of
the following purposes?
(F) It adds an authority’s endorsement to the
author’s view that edited narratives ought to
be treated as ghostwritten accounts.
(G) It provides an example of a mistaken emphasis
in the study of autobiography.
(H) It presents an account of a new method of
literary analysis to be applied to
autobiography.
(I) It illustrates the inadequacy of traditional
approaches to the analysis of autobiography.
(J) It emphasizes the importance of the
relationship between editor and narrator.
20题，in order to 变体，显然作者拿B做让步，拿他做靶子！看看否定的选项是
（B）和（D），再比较，发现（D）讲的是不足，也就是说B的方向是对的，只是火候
不足，显然是错的。答案是（B）。
好，文章我们解完了，7分钟左右的时间是绰绰有余的，文章层次很清晰，题目也规
范，解题过程建立在读文章推理的基础上一点都不复杂！大家跟我读完后，是否对比
刚才自己的阅读有一种豁然开朗的感觉呢？你如果有，那么你一定会觉得“哦！原来
是这么个意思！是这么个用意！”有什么东西是深不可测的？没有！我们只是稍稍站
在“读思想”的角度把握了文章的脉象，因而即使是最高难度的LSAT，应付起来也是
如此轻松愉快，解题成了蹂躏自以为是“老美”的快感。
也许依然有很多人不相信这种境界，或者以为自己不可能达到，那么可以说这本身注
定了你永远的失落！写到这里，我的阅读已经没什么好说的了！原来我还是想拿GRE阅
读来说的，但我发现解题的套路感觉与层次结构已经熟悉地让我厌倦，甚至无聊！！
天生我才，我可不想再在上面耗散我宝贵的精力，何况大家看看上面的文章，我不告
诉你是LSAT，你会怀疑它不是GRE吗？有什么本质分别？没有！因此，限于篇幅，我就
说到这里！相信或者崇拜我的读者，渴望达到较高境界的读者，那么我希望你以信心
为基础，静心为条件，努力去体会《2003爱一个美女好难》中主体部分的每一个字
眼，我不是在为自己贴金，我一直都说这不是我的创新，我付出了很大的代价学到的
东西，在这里只是借花献佛而已！有了它，除了真题，什么阅读参考书都不用买！你
说，阅读讲来讲去不就那么点东西，整理总结得再多再好，自己体会并融会贯通才是
根本，有那么多银子，为什么要花在一门无聊考试的无聊项目上呢？如果你能够坚持
下来，那么终于有一天，你会发觉“读思想”的感觉太美妙了，甚至比我现在感悟到
的更多，纵有千言万语，也道不尽你的荣辱悲喜，唯有泪千行！但是有这样chimera的
一个小弟太“幸福”了，练成了之后跑去考3.15结果不论做语文做数学他都跨区，别
人还在做语文他已经搞定了这个部分在做下个数学，结果到了最后一个部分，监考老
师惊奇得发现一个呆头呆脑的考生已经无题可做，然后…………哎！还是说说正常
的，我的同学little cow水平不是顶牛，练到最后机考时代轻松提前完成verbal部
分，拿了2340，TOEFL 670， 我这所烂校也不例外，学外贸英语的师姐李杜GRE轻松
2400，所以大家都是平等的，牛人与菜鸟往往仅是一念之间而已。反过来说，2400的
并不一定是牛人，2000分的也不一定就是菜鸟，不要苛求自己，只要尽力而为，OK？
这是silentwings唯一的忠告。
（后记）
结尾的时候，天已经大亮，冷风从宿舍的窗户外飘入，我的全身不由一阵战栗！跑下
楼买早点，看见一位全身披着雪白羽绒的清秀女孩正在楼下守侯着自己的爱人。等我
回来时，女孩刚好正依偎在爱人温暖的胸中相携远去，我不知道为什么我会这么在意
他们，只是我的两颊有两股热流在交织汹涌。太累了，真的！值得吗？我躺在床上这
么思考着。一个网友说过，生命是什么颜色的，如果GRE是彩色的！我想告诉他生命有
了GRE就是透明的，空心的，失去颜色的本质了。回想起那晚chimera拿着那把刀将我
的前事斩断，将记忆的相片焚毁的那一刹那，我的心也静了！为什么我要苛求自己
呢？我是谁？不过是一只寄托菜鸟，一个不懂得爱情真谛的男孩，一对一直在沉默中
哭泣的翅膀！圣诞节来了，如果你有身边的所爱，那么你大可将我的文章和GRE阅读一
起丢掉，这些破烂东西都是很短暂无生命力的东东，只有人世间的真挚情感才是永恒
的宝藏。最后祝福你们，我亲爱的G友们，希望你们在爱情与GT的双线道上一路走好！
本文之成，感谢扬州大学的杨欣荣同学和江南大学的little cow，没有他们的督促与
鼓励，我不可能完成这部作品，同时感谢寄托天下阅读版魏宇艳（“花儿”）版主，
对本文的标精与推荐，同时她对广大G友的无限帮助，感谢水妖的岛以前机委会数学
组，逻辑组，类反组的同事们，我永远想念你们！我的阅读版块到这里全部结束，有
问题大家可以与我联系：（不谈GRE是最好不过了，我们可以聊许多学生间更有意义的
事啊！比如爱情啊！大家可以教教我吗？）
QQ：247374145 ICQ：204533993
E-mail: silentwings@etang.com
说实话，阅读不是我的专长，我的特长是数学和逻辑，现在是数学和作文，寒假之
后，如果大家对作文有兴趣，我想也许我们会在作文版块中再见！那时也许叫
《2004XXXXXX》，哈，再见！
——silentwings
2003年12月20日于丹徒镇 |
|
GO
发表于 2005-9-17 17:22:05
发表于 2005-9-17 22:56:31
0
转发
