作文本1.21更新到今天！(低落)

lixinwei1992UID: 2743934

Nowadays, as our society develops, our knowledge and technology are increasing. There is the fact which no one can deny that technology have（has） deep effect(貌似effect 跟的是on) in our daily life. But we can not agree with each other on the issue whether technology makes people’s lives simpler. I deem the answer to that issue is positive. Here are my reasons as follow.

Initially, （好词！赞）since our knowledge and technology become more and more advanced, more and more inventions have appeared.(这句话的句式可以再多样化一些，用两个MORE AND MORE虽然起到了强调作用，但感觉上有些单调，是不是可以试一下come along or come with) For example, in 18th century, after they (WHO?有些太突然的感觉，they比较令人confused)married, there are too many women as domestic engineers. They(Their) responsibility is complicated housework such as washing, cooking, and cleaning. However, when washers, microwaves, these machines had been invented, housewives has been released from housework nowadays, causing they can take advantage of those machines to finish their tasks completely. If one house wife desired to cook a great meal in the past, it may be took one day time(有点别扭the whole day) to prepare materials, whereas now she just need half of hour to cope with the matter, even can make a call to book dishes in restaurant. So, we can view our family’s life indeed become simper.

Actually, not only our family’s life, but also our working has been simple. According to a survey from Virginia University, professors and experts report （reported）that 45% American managers use their phones, computers, and internet to deal with their business problem at their home(homes). These people are not working at office any more, in other words, they do not need to take cars, buses, and subways to commute between home and office every day. Thus, it saves time and money, which makes our working become simple. Except managers, workers also acquire benefits from technology development. Take my father as an instance. My father is a plane designer. I still remember that my father needs a host of paper and tools to draw plane construction and required(前面用的是NEEDS 后面是required 过去式和一般现在式尽量避免在同一个句子中出现) a large amount of time and energy to consider for one night in the past. my mother told me Even when my father slept, he also said much words about plane. Since my father's company equipped my father with a laptop, our father's working life has been easy. He utilizes computer programs to design his plane rather than use paper and tools. Foremost, my father told me it is no necessary to consider problems in his mind, because he can figure out them in programs. From my father's experience, I totally understand that how easy and simple life technology brings."

In sum, based on what I have mentioned, I deem that technology makes people’s lives simple and easy. That is the reason why I hardly agree with the statement that technology makes people’s lives simpler in turn to make people’s lives more complicated.

超赞！24分钟写出那么好的文章来~作文我也是第一次改，有什么误导的地方就多多见谅了
By the way，谢谢你对我的鼓励，说实话我也没怎么了解中国风的具体含义...:loveliness:
大家一起加油喽！

lavenderelaineUID: 2689477

Nowadays, there is a heated topic with sharply risen volume about friendship. Which is better between letting a friend make a mistake and destroying your friendship? I deem that we should directly point out our friends’ mistakes. My reasons are as follow.(following? 我一般用…,for the following reasons. 因为follow 是动词。Following 有名有形)
t  ^. j' H9 e
Initially, we should not destroy our friendship. Everyone cherishes his own friendship, because making friends with each other is a part of our life. It is possible that people do not have parents, but he must have friends in the world.（虽然两个并列句主语可以不一样，但是读起来好像很别扭it is possible that people do not … but it is impossible that …） Since everyone has friends, friendship plays a crucial role in our daily life. Thus, nobody tends to damage our friendship unless he does not want to make friends with other people. Once a person destroys his friendship, he will never enjoy the pleasure of friendship. So no matter what happen(s), we cannot give up our friendship.


We often make a host of mistakes in our daily life. So do our friends. (倒装句在开头加强语气，学习了。)When we made mistakes, our friends should directly point out our errors.  For example, Richard who is my best friend and classmate usually played with me in our high school.（我不太清楚，小问一句usually可以加过去时庅？是过去常常么） One day, after we took a math exam, the teacher gave us marks. Both Richard and I got 100 points. Richard and I noticed that one problem was wrong in his paper, but the fact was that the teacher still gave Richard 10 points. As we all know, if we did not report it to the teacher, Richard would cheat the teacher to get 100. At that moment, I also felt paradox （有这种搭配么paradox是名词。Feel ambivalent. Or felt the paradox between…and …）between saying the truth to the teacher and letting Richard made a mistake. If I had not reported to the teacher, Richard indeed got 100, but it is unfair for other students. Thus, it was fraud which is a huge mistake for everyone. As Richard’s friend, it is impossible for me not to point out the mistake. So, I told the teacher the truth. And then, the teacher retook Richard's paper. Finally, Richard got 90 points. When Richard knew what I（had） did, he was very upset and yelled to me: we are not friends anymore! I tried every means to explain my real meaning. I even wrote a letter to him to show my goal and apology. But the result is that he never has talked with me again. (has never talked to me again是不是顺一些) When I recalled the story, I regret that I did tell the teacher the truth, because which make（s） me lost my best friend—Richard(because+句子。是不是because删了。) . Actually, if I did not tell the teacher the fact, Richard maybe made a mistake which he would never know. It is no (not)necessary for me to frankly point out Richard's mistake in face of the teacher. Now I wish I had told the truth to Richard rather than the teacher. (虚拟过去，学习了。)If I secretly told Richard that where he was wrong at that time, my behavior would let Richard not only know the truth, but also stabilize our friendship between Richard and I.（our和between R and I 是不是有些重复，取一吧！） So, when our friends made a mistake, we should points out their mistakes in front of them in order to preserve our friendship.   


不知道jbc同学是不是特意写这种新颖的段落形式阿。我觉得还不错，但是整篇文章好像那一个例子占的篇幅太大了，不知道这个合不合评分标准阿~lz自行斟酌一下吧 ^^ .

有不少些动词、句型都很perfect。语法功底很深厚内，没有语法错误。学习了 ~.~


第一次改，有不足的地方见谅啦！ 互相学恶习 互相进步~~:lol

ivybettyUID: 2328308

2.18 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Letting a friend make a mistake is better than saying or doing something that may destroy your friendship.- O- o. M+ I) v/ i' p% B
+ |% `4 n  V  ?9 x( k

Nowadays, there is a heated topic with sharply risen volume about friendship. Which is better between letting a friend make a mistake and destroying your friendship? I deem that we should directly point out our friends’ mistakes. My reasons are as follow.) T6 b! |* f. `- C! M+ h1 u( ]8 j
8 x# F% z/ L& R( D- x$ P4 _
Initially, we should not destroy our friendship. Everyone cherishes his own friendship, because making friends with each other is a part of our life. It is possible that people do not have parents, but he must have friends in the world. Since everyone has friends, friendship plays a crucial role in our daily life. Thus, nobody tends to damage our friendship unless he does not want to make friends with other people. Once a person destroys his friendship, he will never enjoy the pleasure of friendship. So no matter what happen, we cannot give up our friendship.4 f: E* g  x6 W, ?( e( ~7 W
We often make a host of mistakes in our daily life. So(, so?) do our friends. When we made mistakes, our friends should directly point out our errors.  For example, Richard who is my best friend and classmate usually played with me in our high school. One day, after we took a math exam, the teacher gave us marks. Both Richard and I got 100 points. Richard and I noticed that one problem was wrong in his paper, but the fact was that the teacher still gave Richard 10 points. As we all know, if we did not report it to the teacher, Richard would cheat the teacher to get 100. At that moment, I also felt paradox(dilemma如何?) between saying the truth to the teacher and letting Richard made a mistake. If I had not reported to the teacher, Richard indeed got 100, but it is unfair for other students. Thus, it was fraud which is a huge mistake for everyone. As Richard’s friend, it is impossible for me not to point out the mistake. So, I told the teacher the truth. And then, the teacher retook(rechecked如何?) Richard's paper. Finally, Richard got 90 points. When Richard knew what I did, he was very upset and yelled to me: we are not friends anymore! I tried every means to explain my real meaning. I even wrote a letter to him to show my goal and apology. But the result is that he never has talked with me again. When I recalled the story, I regret that I did tell the teacher the truth, because which make me lost my best friend--Richard. Actually, if I did not tell the teacher the fact, Richard maybe made a mistake which he would never know. It is no necessary for me to frankly point out Richard's mistake in face of the teacher. Now I wish I had told the truth to Richard rather than the teacher. If I secretly told Richard that where he was wrong at that time, my behavior would let Richard not only know the truth, but also stabilize our friendship between Richard and I. So, when our friends made a mistake, we should points out their mistakes in front of them in order to preserve our friendship.   ( v9 ]' @4 Y) r

Based on what I have mentioned above, I believe that we neither let a friend make a mistake nor doing something that may destroy your friendship. Only way is to point out our friends’ mistakes directly.
LZ的意思是:直接指出朋友的错误不会破坏友谊?这个和题目不大相关吧。请LZ指教。

helenhuang19UID: 2742635

2.19 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for a teacher to help students gain self-confidence than to teach them specific knowledge?9 F. B, ^6 X1 T8 |. @& p
: h1 Z) T( a# m1 w  U% g7 a+ S.
Which is it(it?) more important between a teacher to help students gain self-confidence and a teacher teach them specific knowledge？老师之间的对决？
Nowadays, the problem has been（建议时态换换） a heated topic with sharply risen volume. In my perspective, I deem that teacher should be responsible for both(删) give(giving) students both self-confidence and specific knowledge. That is the reason why I hardly agree with the statement that it is more important for a teacher to help students gain self-confidence than to teach them specific knowledge.+ H- C% S1 S" l' p; W

Initially, teachers should bring students specific knowledge and skill. Teachers' job is to guide their students to learn technology and knowledge, causing(建议leading) students to get jobs easily. So, teachers should provide more and more information which is related with students' mayor. As our society develops faster and faster, if students cannot accept a large amount of knowledge, they will hardly huntfind satisfied jobs after their graduation. Thus, teachers' goal is not completed, in other words, they failed to acquire credits and honors which should belong to them.(不懂) Students will be excellent workers and qualified students, until teachers can give students enough knowledge. So, teachers should render students specific knowledge.

个人觉得这段论证的没什么意义

In addition, it is essential that teachers help students gain self-confidence. Self-confidence is basement to get a better job for everyone. Teachers must instantly instill 这词偏向“灌输宗教观念” self-confidence to students. Students cannot enjoy their lifelives without self-confidence, even to murder other people.(what?,这话别乱说啊。二是有点跑题) For example, Richard who is my friend in high school is an excellent student. He used to get A in every subject’s exams. However, he was self-distrust student. He never talked with people or discussed in class. When teacher asked him why he participated our discussion(？), he did not think he can finish a presentation as perfect as his marks. Even though Richard always can got A in any exams, the teacher and students except me never concerned about him. Richard often told me that he feelfelt very lonely in class and he deem himself iswas the worst person in the world when we were debating in the class.(你们在班上讨论
？) Two years ago, he ceased his life by a gun. In his funeral, I consider that if the teacher had encouraged him to gain self-confidence, his death would have has been totally eschewed. From my experience, we can conclude how crucial teachers help students gain self-confidence it删 is.* }0 i: s$ p  d
! t! k0 `* J, T) D6 i
In sum, Based on what I wrote above, I regard that teacher should responsible for both give students self-confidence and specific knowledge.一样的错误，另：最好在一篇文章里别重复

tomatooUID: 2754865

Which is it（不要） more important between a teacher to help students gain self-confidence and a teacher teach them specific knowledge? Nowadays, the problem has been a heated topic with sharply risen volume. In my perspective, I deem that teacher should responsible for both give students self-confidence and specific knowledge. That is the reason why I hardly agree with the statement that it is more important for a teacher to help students gain self-confidence than to teach them specific knowledge.T3 Z, b: m  g3 f& M

Initially, teachers should bring students specific knowledge and skill. Teachers' job is to guide their students to learn technology and knowledge, causing students get jobs easily. So, teachers should provide more and more information which is related with（be related to） students' mayor(?major?). As our society develops faster and faster, if students cannot accept a large amount of knowledge, they will hardly hunt jobs after their graduation. Thus, teachers' goal is not completed(这句什么意思？读完in other words的面的还是不懂), in other words, they failed to acquire credits and honors which should belong to them. Students will be excellent workers and qualified students, until teachers can give students enough knowledge. So, teachers should render students specific knowledge(今天这个论述得比较干).6 Y' x+ u2 y. L5 X

In addition, it is essential that teachers help students gain self-confidence. Self-confidence is basement to get a better job for everyone. Teachers must instantly instill self-confidence to students（instill sth in sb, or, instill sb whith sth）. Students cannot enjoy their life without self-confidence, even to murder other people. For example, Richard who is my friend in high school is an excellent student. He used to get A in every subject’s exams. However, he was self-distrust student. He never talked with people or discussed in class. When teacher ask him why he participated our discussion, he did not think he can finish a presentation as perfect as his marks. Even though Richard always can got A in any exams, the teacher and students except me never concerned him. Richard often told me that he feel very lonely in class and he deem himself is the worst person in the world when we were debating in the class. Two years ago, he ceased his life by a gun. In his funeral, I consider that if the teacher had encouraged him to gain self-confidence, his death would have totally eschewed（这个词这里不合适，另外要用被动，be avoided）. From my experience, we can conclude how crucial teachers help students gain self-confidence it is(这句话不对).

In sum, Based on what I wrote above, I regard that teacher should responsible for both give students self-confidence and specific knowledge.

这种中立观点相当于没表达自己的观点，题目是说哪个更重要，意思是说，大家已经默认，这两个东西都很重要，要比较哪个更重要。你这样的观点相当于论述了题目已经承认的观点。并没对两者进行比较，就算想说两者都很重要，也应该将两者结合起来说。你的好多作文都是这个风格，我越看越觉得应该表达一下自己的看法。当然，一已之见而已！

helenhuang19UID: 2742635

2.20 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors, lawyers or business leaders are paid.
  r* E# k3 \( Z8 u$ D1 V0 T4 s6 P; Ln  ?% Y
Nowadays, there is a fact that teachers' wage is less and less. Should teachers be paid at least as much as doctors, lawyers and managers? It is a heated topic with sharply risen volume. I agree with the statement that teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors. My reasons are as following.（are as? 建议My reasons run as following.）

Initially, children are our country future.（futur of our country）
Our children who cannot read, write and speak are very sad for us.
So, education plays a crucial role in our country.
Since education is a problem which nobody can ignore, why do we concern(?) teachers who devoted all their time and energy on their students?
As our society develops, it is an unfair fact that our average salary instantly increases, especially layers(lawyers), doctors, and managers, while teachers' salary decreases day by day.
Actually, teachers' working time and pressure are higher than those of layers, doctors, and managers.
For example, my mother was a high school teacher when I was four.
She never took care of house works, because she must（had to） put her all time and stamina(stamina 多指耐力，类似于跑马拉松那种，建议换energy) on her students.
I saw her stay(staying) up one night to correct students’ homework.
She left school when I was five due to too little salary.
According to a survey by Virginia University, 30000 American teachers have resigned their positions since 2000.
In this way, our education system will be collapsed.
When we enjoy our wealthy and harmony life（lives）, we never expect或(删，挺多余的，或 we have never considered) our children will (may) confront with the situation that no teachers will teach them.
How serious and worried future it will be!
So, now we ask our government for enhancing enhance investments on education in order to render more money to teachers, which causes more and more excellent and talented people will be abstracted to be teachers. which attracts more and more intellects to be teachers.
Thus, our education level will be enhanced. Our country future will be better((em,俺不知咋改，这句写的不好，用分号吧)
0

/ a
; Z% M0 z2 O3 N0 T. A5 w
In addition, layerslawyers, doctors, and managers also were taught by the teachers.
If our teachers’ salary is lower than those people, teachers who teach layerslawyers, doctors, and managers will quit their job to be layerslawyers, doctors, and managers. (绕)
Thus, there are no any（删） teachers who have the ability, knowledge, and skill to guildguide lawyers layers, doctors, and managers.
In the end, our society will have no any layers, doctors, and managers. So, preventing the situation from happening, we should allow? teachers should be paid at least as much as layers and so on.   @6 D$ k% Y* q
( q$ F* b4 }  C! y
In sum, based on what I have mentioned above, I cannot agree the statement that teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors any more.(小姐你做什么？自己推翻自己？哈哈。我给你个创意分。。)

不错，大大的进步

奇流沙UID: 2698749

2.20 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors, lawyers or business leaders are paid./ Z' P0 H6 r, }
& C9 _8 l6 @7 b8 J/ L# ?$ a' q
Nowadays, there is a fact that teachers' wage is less and less. Should teachers be paid at least as much as doctors, lawyers and managers? It is a heated topic with sharply risen volume. I agree with the statement that teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors. My reasons are as following.

Initially, children are our country future. Our children who cannot read, write and speak are very sad for(用for么？) us. So, education plays a crucial role in our country. Since education is a problem which nobody can ignore, why do we concern teachers who devoted all their time and energy on their students?（嗯，请教，我的理解：既然为教育不可忽视，为什么我们不更关心一点投入所有时间和精力的教师呢？但是这样的话，concern用得太突兀了……） As our society develops, it is an unfair fact that our average salary instantly increases, especially lawyers, doctors, and managers, while teachers' salary decreases day by day（这句夸张了，至多是涨的不多，不至于减少）. Actually, teachers' working time and pressure are higher than those of layers, doctors, and managers. For example, my mother was a high school teacher when I was four. She never took care of house works, because she must put her all time and stamina on her students. I（加以表示延时性的副词如何？always, had ever, etc?） saw her stay up one night to correct students’ homework. She left school when I was five due to too little salary. According to a survey by Virginia University, 30000 American teachers have resigned their positions since 2000.(好例子~膜拜下~) In this way, our education system will be collapsed. When we enjoy our wealthy and harmony life, we never expect our children will confront with the situation that no teachers teach them. How serious and worried future it will be! So, now we ask our government enhance investments on education in order to render more money to teachers, which causes more and more excellent and talented people will be abstracted（attracted？） to be teachers. Thus, our education level will be enhanced. Our country future will be better.

In addition, lawyers, doctors, and managers also were taught by the teachers. If our teachers’ salary is lower than those people, teachers who teach lawyers, doctors, and managers will quit their job to be lawyers, doctors, and managers. Thus, there are no any teachers who have the ability, knowledge, and skill to guild(guide?) lawyers, doctors, and managers. In the end, our society will have no any layers, doctors, and managers. So, preventing the situation from happening, we should allow teachers should(to) be paid at least as much as lawyers and so on. # ^- }& Y5 _# k1 p+ n
$ v- X6 ?0 X. X- ]& K
In sum, based on what I have mentioned above, I cannot agree the statement that teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors any more.
1.教育对于整个社会都很重要，教师在教育上不可或缺，只有教师的工资上去了，教育水准才能提高。
2.如果教师的工资不和其他职业一样，从事教师职业的人都回去从事其他职业，没有了教师，就没有了教授技能的人，其他职业也就不会有了……
呃，不知道我这样理解你的论点对不对，jbc童鞋的作文向来是高水准滴，但是这篇读下来，我觉得是不是有点夸张了？虽然夸张对于艺术是允许的。从第二点来看，因为工资上不去，教师就会不会没人干了，这个有点……然后没有教师，其他职业所需要的技能没人教授，其他职业也没人做，呃，这个也有点……
啊，不过是个人之见啊~~还望童鞋一起探讨~~

刀小镜UID: 2618532

Nowadays, there is a fact that teachers' wage is less and less. Should teachers be paid at least as much as doctors, lawyers and managers? It is a heated topic with sharply risen volume. I agree with the statement that teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors. My reasons are as following.

Initially, children are our country’s future. Our children who cannot read, write and speak are very sad for us. So, education plays a crucial role in our country. Since education is a problem (觉得还是用matter比较合适 problem多少有些负面色彩) which nobody can ignore, why do
we concern teachers who devoted all their time and energy on（to） their students? (前后似乎说不通
既然教育很重要为什么我们要关心老师的问题？)As our society develops, it is an unfair fact that our average salary instantly increases, especially layers(姑娘你污点了><), doctors, and managers, while teachers' salary decreases day by day. Actually, teachers' working time and pressure are higher than those of layers, doctors, and managers. For example, my mother was a high school teacher when I was four. She never took care of house works, because she must put her all time and stamina on her students. I saw her staying up one night to correct students’ homework. She left school when I was five due to too little salary. According to a survey by Virginia University, 30000 American teachers have resigned their positions since 2000. In this way, our education system will be collapsed. When we enjoy our wealthy and harmony life, we never expect our children will confront with the situation that no teachers teach them. How serious and worried future it will be! So, now we ask our government enhance investments on education in order to render more money to teachers, which causes more and more excellent and talented people will be abstracted（这个词是心不在焉的意思 attracted） to be teachers. Thus, our education level will be enhanced. Our country future will be better.

In addition, layers, doctors, and managers also were taught by the teachers. If our teachers’ salary is lower than those people, teachers who teach layers, doctors, and managers will quit their job to be layers, doctors, and managers. （一句话出现三次这三中职业
看上去有些重复
最好用代词替换一下）Thus, there are no any teachers who have the ability, knowledge, and skill to guild（guide） layers, doctors, and managers. In the end, our society will have no any layers, doctors, and managers. So, preventing the (this) situation from happening, we should allow teachers should be paid at least as much as layers and so on. (三种职业手拉手出现的次数有点多
最好改一下)


In sum, based on what I have mentioned above, I cannot agree the statement that teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors any more.（好句子！）姑娘每次作文最后结尾都显得有些仓促
前面写的满满的最后却只有个小尾巴
难道是因为时间原因？这个姑娘可以放心
你到考场上速度绝对比平时练习快
所以建议姑娘平时练习的时候尽量把结尾写的完满一点

刀小镜UID: 2618532

In addition, lawyers, doctors, and managers also were taught by the teachers. If our teachers’ salary is lower than those people, a large number of teachers will quit their job to do other kinds of professions with higher salary, such as the three jobs I have(呀，语法废柴也不确定要不要加I have了) mentioned above. Thus there are no sufficient teachers who have the professional ability, specific knowledge, and skill in school. In the end, our society will have no any lawyers, doctors, and managers. So, preventing this situation from happening, we should allow teachers should be paid at least as much as lawyers and so on.

能力有限 望跟姑娘商讨

Uranus1989UID: 2756616

2.21 Do you prefer to finish a project completely then to another one or do two or several projects at a time?
j) P) c6 C) |* K
Nowadays, there is heated topic with sharply rising volume about the way of working.(为啥是about the way of working什么意思？) Which is better between finishing a project completely and doing two or several projects?(这句改成which is better, finishing a project completely or doing two or several projects at the same time?)In my perspective at a time(这是啥?), I deem that doing two or several projects at a time is better than finishing a project completely. My reasons are as following.2 ]8 m/ K$ T& U7 V" d! u8 v1 g9 T
4 P% d" _6 m% A  e4 A
Initially, doing two or several projects at a time is the most efficient mean to deal with problems. For example, all factories used to ask worker to finish a product completely in 18 century. But the fact is that modern factories arrange workers do one part of products. In this way, workers just need to repeat constantly the same procedure. Now, many powerful international corporations apply the way to enhance their productivity. According to a survey of Virginia University, dividing the whole procedure to many steps at least increase worker five times efficiency(increase as five times as the older efficiency). So, doing two or several projects at a time can save a host of time and energy.. O6 L! V1 w0 P
工厂的流水线这个例子很好啊，赞
In addition, doing two or several projects at a time can avoid a host of mistakes which finally will form(形成？不太对把accumulate to如何) disasters. As we all know, mistakes are hard to eschew in our working. Even though it is uncertain that doing two or several projects at a time does not make mistake, it indeed leads our mistakes to the lowest rate. The way can result in such an amazing outcome that workers can be familiar with their procedure and master their skills, which are attributed to a large amount of repeated procedure. Whereas, the way that（这个that用到这里到底是什么意思？用of?） finishing a project completely then to another one cannot let the magic result come true. It is the reason why I like doing two or several projects at a time more than finishing a project completely. (怎么说呢。你是还在用上面那个流水线的例子么？那么上面那个还勉强成立，但是这段这个例子。。。你想啊，你说可以少犯错，是因为每个员工都在反复重复一道工序，不觉得有点怪么？不知道你写的时候是不是真的想清楚了，反正我觉得有点在逻辑上不成立，当然也可能是我弄错了）

In sum, based on what I have mentioned above, I prefer to do two or several projects at a time.

奇流沙UID: 2698749

2.21 Do you prefer to finish a project completely then to another one or do two or several projects at a time?, k8 i7 ?  @% C  Q  t6 y

Nowadays, there is heated topic with sharply rising volume about the way of working. Which is better between finishing a project completely and doing two or several projects? In my perspective at a time（这个为啥会忽然出现？）, I deem that doing two or several projects at a time is better than finishing a project completely. My reasons are as following.
我就是不看你的ID，看到这个开头就能百分之百知道是JBC童鞋了~
Initially, doing two or several projects at a time is the most efficient mean to deal with problems. For example, all factories used to ask workers to finish a product completely in 18 century. But the fact is that modern factories arrange workers do one part of products. In this way, workers just need to repeat constantly the same procedure. Now, many powerful international corporations apply the way to enhance their productivity. According to a survey of Virginia University, dividing the whole procedure to many steps at least increase worker five times efficiency. So, doing two or several projects at a time can save a host of time and energy.
论点有点牵强，童鞋说呢？题目是同时做两个或更多的项目，童鞋论的重心是分步完成一个项目。在得到结论句之前，我觉得再加上说明分步做和同时做多个两者的关系就更好了。比如说把工厂里的做工方式应用于自己做项目，也是很有效果的。从全局来看，自己是在同时进行着多个项目的，因此同时进行多个项目是好的， blabla~~

In addition, doing two or several projects at a time can avoid a host of mistakes which finally will form disasters. As we all know, mistakes are hard to eschew（so高级的词汇~星星眼） in our working. Even though it is uncertain that doing two or several projects at a time does not make mistake, it indeed leads our mistakes to the lowest rate. The way can result in such an amazing outcome that workers can be more familiar with their procedure and master their skills, which are attributed to a large amount of repeated procedure. Whereas, the way that finishing a project completely then to another one cannot let the magic result come true. It is the reason why I like doing two or several projects at a time more than finishing a project completely.
我觉得此段的问题和上段一样啊，似乎还是在说把一个项目分工给不同的工人做的好处啊。
In sum, based on what I have mentioned above, I prefer to do two or several projects at a time.
Jbc童鞋这篇写的果然好像不怎么顺手的说~
唉，这篇文章我也是想出了解决办法，却没有解决方案…………加油~~