- 最后登录
- 2022-11-23
- 在线时间
- 1571 小时
- 寄托币
- 4677
- 声望
- 348
- 注册时间
- 2015-3-26
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 1019
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 3485
- UID
- 3605802
  
- 声望
- 348
- 寄托币
- 4677
- 注册时间
- 2015-3-26
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 1019
|
本帖最后由 无敌浩克One 于 2015-5-12 15:53 编辑
2015.5.12 comprehension note!
Present-day philosophers usually envision their discipline as an endeavor that has been, since antiquity, distinct from and superior to any particular intellectual discipline, such as theology or science. Such philosophical concerns as the mind-body problem or, more generally, the nature of human knowledge, they believe, are basic human questions whose tentative philosophical solutions have served as the necessary foundations on which all other intellectual speculation has rested.
the first paragraph puts up a view that Present-day philosophers(one key of time mark) consider(envision) philosophy is distinct from and superior to any particular intellectual discipline. And mentioned basic human questions(which tested in the question)
The basis for this view, however, lies in a serious misinterpretation of the past, a projection of modern concerns onto past events. The idea of an autonomous discipline called “philosophy,” distinct from and sitting in judgment on such pursuits as theology and science turns out, on close examination, to be of quite recent origin. When, in the seventeenth century, Descartes and Hobbes rejected medieval philosophy, they did not think of themselves, as modern philosophers do, as proposing a new and better philosophy, but rather as furthering “the warfare between science and theology.” They were fighting, albeit discreetly, to open the intellectual world to the new science and to liberate intellectual life from ecclesiastical philosophy and envisioned their work as contributing to the growth, not of philosophy, but of research in mathematics and physics. This link between philosophical interests and scientific practice persisted until the nineteenth century, when decline in ecclesiastical power over scholarship and changes in the nature of science provoked the final separation of philosophy from both.
the second paragraph firstly dispute the view of present-day philosophers by mentioning their belief lies in a serious misinterpretation of the past. This sentence is also the key to the inference question. Then the author interprets the past. D and H proposed that philosophy is the warfare between science and theology. At the end of the paragraph, the writer refutes this view by saying that until 19 century(time mark), two elements provoked the separation of philosophy from science and theology.(naturally, the author will talk about the two elements in the following paragraph ---- active thinking)
The demarcation of philosophy from science was facilitated by the development in the early nineteenth century of a new notion, that philosophy’s core interest should be epistemology, the general explanation of what it means to know something. Modern philosophers now trace that notion back at least to Descartes and Spinoza, but it was not explicitly articulated until the late eighteenth century, by Kant, and did not become built into the structure of academic institutions and the standard self-descriptions of philosophy professors until the late nineteenth century. Without the idea of epistemology, the survival of philosophy in an age of modern science is hard to imagine. Metaphysics, philosophy’s traditional core—considered as the most general description of how the heavens and the earth are put together—had been rendered almost completely meaningless by the spectacular progress of physics. Kant, however, by focusing philosophy on the problem of knowledge, managed to replace metaphysics with epistemology, and thus to transform the notion of philosophy as “queen of sciences” into the new notion of philosophy as a separate, foundational discipline. Philosophy became “primary” no longer in the sense of “highest” but in the sense of “underlying”. After Kant, philosophers were able to reinterpret seventeenth-and eighteenth-century thinkers as attempting to discover “How is our knowledge possible?” and to project this question back even on the ancients.
one of the element is a new notion finally formed in the early nineteenth resulting from Kant's articulation in the late 18 century(time mark) that since the core of philosophy changed into epistemology because of the progress of physics, philosophy is considered as as a separate, foundational discipline.
17. Which of the following best expresses the author’s main point?
(A) Philosophy’s overriding interest in basic human questions is a legacy primarily of the work of Kant.
basic human questions is in the first paragraph. it has not direct relation with Kant
(B) Philosophy was deeply involved in the seventeenth-century warfare between science and religion.
narrow the scope, only the convention used to illustrate that present-day philosophers lie in wrong interpretation of the past
(C) The set of problems of primary importance to philosophers has remained relatively constant since antiquity.
not constant, they have changed after Kant's contribution to philosophy
(D) The status of philosophy as an independent intellectual pursuit is a relatively recent development.
right: until 19 centuray
(E) The role of philosophy in guiding intellectual speculation has gradually been usurped by science.
wrong. only the first paragraph talked about this topic and it did not mention this view
18. According to the passage, present-day philosophers believe that the mind-body problem is an issue that
(A) has implications primarily for philosophers
(B) may be affected by recent advances in science
(C) has shaped recent work in epistemology
(D) has little relevance to present-day philosophy
(E) has served as a basis for intellectual speculation since antiquity
right: as the mind-body problem or, more generally, the nature of human knowledge, they believe, are basic human questions whose tentative philosophical solutions have served as the necessary foundations on which all other intellectual speculation has rested.
19. According to the author, philosophy became distinct from science and theology during the
(A) ancient period
(B) medieval period
(C) seventeenth century
still is the warfare between science and theology
(D) nineteenth century
right: This link between philosophical interests and scientific practice persisted until the nineteenth century, when decline in ecclesiastical power over scholarship and changes in the nature of science provoked the final separation of philosophy from both.
(E) twentieth century
20. The author suggests that Descartes’ support for the new science of the seventeenth century can be characterized as
(A) pragmatic and hypocritical
(B) cautious and inconsistent
(C) daring and opportunistic
(D) intense but fleeting
(E) strong but prudent
relative sentence: They were fighting(strong), albeit(but) discreetly(prudent)
I can find the answer quickly by focusing on the passage where D appears
21. The author of the passage implies which of the following in discussing the development of philosophy during the nineteenth century?
(A) Nineteenth-century philosophy took science as its model for understanding the bases of knowledge.
no
(B) The role of academic institutions in shaping metaphysical philosophy grew enormously during the nineteenth century.
relative sentence: did not become built into the structure of academic institutions and the standard self-descriptions of philosophy professors until the late nineteenth century.
not mentioned academic institution when talking about metaphysical philosophy(which is replaced by epistemology)
(C) Nineteenth-century philosophers carried out a program of investigation explicitly laid out by Descartes and Spinoza.
contradict, not laid out by D, but Kant
(D) Kant had an overwhelming impact on the direction of nineteenth-century philosophy.
right: Without the idea of epistemology, the survival of philosophy in an age of modern science is hard to imagine. Kant, however, by focusing philosophy on the problem of knowledge, managed to replace metaphysics with epistemology, and thus to transform the notion of philosophy as “queen of sciences” into the new notion of philosophy as a separate, foundational discipline.
Thus shows the significance of Kant
(E) Nineteenth-century philosophy made major advances in understanding the nature of knowledge.
22. With which of the following statements concerning the writing of history would the author of the passage be most likely to agree?
(A) History should not emphasize the role played by ideas over the role played by individuals.
not mentioned the relationship between ideas and individuals
(B) History should not be distorted by attributing present-day consciousness to historical figures.
relative sentence: the basis for this view, however, lies in a serious misinterpretation of the past
(C) History should not be focused primarily on those past events most relevant to the present.
not mentioned most relevant
(D) History should be concerned with describing those aspects of the past that differ most from those of the present.
not mentioned differ most
(E) History should be examined for the lessons it can provide in understanding current problems.
not mentioned lessons for current problems
23. The primary function of the passage as a whole is to
(A) compare two competing models
no models
(B) analyze a difficult theory
not better than D
(C) present new evidence for a theory
no new evidence, the significant progress happened in late 18 century
(D) correct an erroneous belief by describing its origins
right, first 17 century, than the development in 18 century which finally led the conclusion
(E) resolve a long-standing theoretical controversy
not controversy, but revise |
|