- 最后登录
- 2016-3-21
- 在线时间
- 42 小时
- 寄托币
- 37
- 声望
- 55
- 注册时间
- 2015-8-13
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 16
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 103
- UID
- 3646766

- 声望
- 55
- 寄托币
- 37
- 注册时间
- 2015-8-13
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 16
|
发表于 2015-8-14 21:36:54
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 lullaby717 于 2015-8-15 13:39 编辑
166)The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council.
An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East Meria, where fish consumption is very high, people visit the doctor only once or twice per year for the treatment of colds. This shows that eating a substantial amount of fish can clearly prevent colds. Furthermore, since colds are the reason most frequently given for absences from school and work, attendance levels will improve. Therefore, we recommend the daily use of a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil as a good way to prevent colds and lower absenteeism.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The West Meria Public Health Council suggests that using a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil can reduce absenteeism by preventing colds. The author argues that high fish consumption in East Meria contributed to the low rate of hospital visits caused by colds and therefore, by preventing colds using a supplement extracted from fish oil, absenteeism can be abated in West Meria since it is the primary reason given for not showing up in school or work. However, there are a number of questions need to be considered before deciding the efficacy of the supplement recommended, namely, whether the low rate of hospital visits reflect better health condition; whether high fish consumption is the cause of the modicum of hospital visits; whether colds are the true reason of absenteeism; whether the supplement extracted from the fish oil will be as effective as the the fish itself.
分号用的不错
注意原题用的是visit doctor 你却全部改成了hospital 这让私家诊所医生情何以堪
there are a number of questions need to be 句子结构
First, we want to know whether the health condition of East Meria people is genuinely better than West Meria.The arguer claims that in East Meria people rarely visit hospitals because of colds. This does not necessarily mean that people are less likely to catch colds in East Meria. People may not visit hospitals because they can coalesce from colds without any treatment. If that is the case, the recommendation would not be warranted as the evidence upon which it is based dose not hold anymore.
这里其实重点关注的是cold 你换成health condition 有点偏题
这里需要多写一些其他可能性 比如自己买药吃 你可以看看我的提纲
Even though it is true that people in East Meria are less likely to catch colds, it is not clear whether fish consumption is the sufficient and necessary explanation for it. It may turn out that, for example, people in East Meria have eat more balanced diet and exercise more often, which contribute to preventing colds not fish consumption. In this scenario, again, the argument would be weakened and the recommendation need to be reconsidered.
have eat动词用法
which contribute to preventing colds not fish consumption 句子结构
Moreover, one more question need to answered is the efficacy of the nutritional supplement extracted from fish oil. Even if the fish is effective at preventing colds there is no guarantee that the the derived product will be effective as well. If the supplement turns out have no effect then the recommendation would be futile.
turns out have no effect句子结构
Finally, the true reason for absenteeism remains dubious as people may lie in order to get extra free time. If the recommendation is to be effective in reducing the absenteeism, supposing the supplement can prevent colds, we need to be sure that colds are the exact causes of absences and people are not merely malingering.
感觉写得有点单薄 你可以看看我的提纲
In conclusion, in order to assess the recommendation of a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil as a means to prevent colds and reduce absenteeism in West Merai, we need further information on the health condition of East Meria people, the contribution of fish consumption towards preventing colds, the efficacy of the supplement and the genuine reason behind absenteeism.
总的来说写得不错
改:
The West Meria Public Health Council suggests that using a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil can reduce absenteeism by preventing colds. The author argues that high fish consumption in East Meria contributed to the low rate of doctor visits caused by colds and therefore, by preventing colds using a supplement extracted from fish oil, absenteeism can be abated in West Meria since it is the primary reason given for not showing up in school or work. However, there is a number of questions need to be considered before deciding the efficacy of the supplement recommended, namely, whether the low rate of doctor visits reflect better health condition; whether high fish consumption is the cause of the modicum of doctor visits; whether colds are the true reason of absenteeism; whether the supplement extracted from the fish oil will be as effective as the the fish itself.
First, we want to know whether people are genuinely less likely to catch colds in East Meria than West Meria. The arguer claims that in East Meria people rarely visit hospitals because of colds. This does not necessarily mean that people are less likely to catch colds in East Meria. People may not visit doctors because they can coalesce from colds without any treatment. Or it is possible that people can buy medicine for treating colds without prescription. Alternatively, people may be too poor to go to the doctors. If any of these possibility is true, the recommendation would not be warranted as the evidence upon which it is based dose not hold anymore.
Even though it is true that people in East Meria are less likely to catch colds, it is not clear whether fish consumption is the sufficient and necessary explanation for it. It may turn out that, for example, people in East Meria have more balanced diet and exercise more often, which contribute to preventing colds. In this scenario, again, the argument would be weakened and the recommendation need to be reconsidered.
Moreover, one more question need to answered is the efficacy of the nutritional supplement extracted from fish oil. Even if the fish is effective at preventing colds there is no guarantee that the the derived product will be effective as well. A carefully designed control experiment is needed to establish whether the nutritional supplement can prevent colds, compared to placebos. If the supplement turns out having no effect then the recommendation would be futile.
Finally, the true reason for absenteeism remains dubious as people may lie in order to get extra free time. If the recommendation is to be effective in reducing the absenteeism, supposing the supplement can prevent colds, we need to be sure that colds are the exact causes of absences and people are not merely malingering. One way to make sure is to require medical certificates. Also, surveys concerning attitudes towards school and work can be conducted in West Meria. But again, people may not give honest responses. Therefore, perhaps preventing colds would not reduce absenteeism.
In conclusion, in order to assess the recommendation of a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil as a means to prevent colds and reduce absenteeism in West Merai, we need further information on the health condition of East Meria people, the contribution of fish consumption towards preventing colds, the efficacy of the supplement and the genuine reason behind absenteeism. |
|