- 最后登录
- 2013-3-19
- 在线时间
- 147 小时
- 寄托币
- 117
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-27
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 63
- UID
- 2537885
![Rank: 2](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level2.gif)
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 117
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-27
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
本帖最后由 zmy1029 于 2010-8-1 20:11 编辑
改179L
TOPIC: ISSUE50 - "In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."
Education circle是说教育系统吗 system会不会更好 has taken various means to improve the quality of instruction, but is that useful? Concerning faculties' spending time outside the academic circle, it can enhance teaching performance in some degree. However, when intending to cover all the fields, precedence should be given to the voice of teachers and students, who constitute the main ontology in education.
First, there is no denying that practice outside the campus, a great complement to academic study, is beneficial for both faculties and students. A proverbial phenomenon nowadays is that some faculties emphasize too much on theoretic research, which is totally dislocated with society. And students are crowned with genius in theory, idiot in practice. By working and learning from outside, they can enrich their mind with cutting-edge technology, and consequently, get acquaintance with social needs and changes in their fields. Therefore, they can flexibly change syllabus and teaching methods according to the first-hand experience.
However, not every faculty should and can afford to spend time in non-academic field. It should clarify its target when putting into practice. On the one hand, not all subjects closely link to applications widely used or recognized. For instance, subjects like quantum mechanics, spacial specially physics where which seldom people are conversant with and have virtuosity in, where do teachers in these fields to practice outside the lab and find a "boss". On the other hand, if one luckily come across such a job, say, the commercial use of quantum mechanics, is it worth to spend a large amount of time of professors examining the comings and goings of a business, and learning every terminology and equation from scratch. May be this time a breathtaking theory has been verified if he or she lucidated(maitokugan) in the lab.
Further, the quality of instruction cannot avoid being affected when all faculties devoted in non-academic field. Dabbling into a different circle, although in the related fields, is not a piece of cake for everyone, including teachers. A good teacher at school may not be a good worker in the factory. They have to adapt to a new environment, learning practical skills from start and communication with new colleges colleagues, all are time-consuming. What’s more, everyone's energy and buoyancy are limited, if too much attention fixed on working outside, consequently, time for teaching, interaction with students will diminish. Insufficient concentration on students cannot guarantee education quality.
Working outside can pose big challenge to faculties and schools, too. As we cannot preclude a fact that some excellent faculties may be poached by headhunters, since most people are crème de la crème concerning their firm grounding in academic knowledge and years of teaching experience. And it is probable for people to choose another boss because of attractive salary, especially for those consider teaching just as a profession not as a lifelong cause. And this talent drainage is detrimental to both students and schools. 我觉得你这段可以写个具体点的例子出来效果会更好,同样的事例.
Squaring up advantages and disadvantages mentioned above, schools need to institutionalize some provisions to maximize boons and minimize bales. First, it's advisable for school leaders to conduct an inquiry across the campus, finding out the specific number of students and teachers, who have such a demand to connect to practical world. Remember, students are fundamental in education whose benefits should prioritize. Second, giving faculties one semester in an academic year who has real needs to experience the profession related, but they should sign a contract in advance, stating they would come back to school when time is due. Third, if conditions permitted, it is conducive for universities cooperating with some local companies to establish regular training and internship. That's really one stone killing three birds which caters for the needs of faculties and solve school's misgivings about talent drainage. And what's more, students are easily to find internship and job after graduation.
Although devoting time in the practical field may facilitate teaching, it has limitations and is doubtful when applied to all fields. And instructing qualities cannot be improved only by gaining experience outside, instead, it is determined by teacher’s major, capacity and commitment to education course, and the center of gravity——students.
心得:三段搞出来了
起&合
不知道怎么写
不想用模板,但是又不知道该如何开头。结尾的合难道只是重复,提出新的意见又不可能花大量的时间论证,那该怎么办。
整篇文章觉得很多词都在重复。考虑到 consider 只想到这个
还有
在外面工作该怎么表达,因为他不仅仅限于工作,总不能说in the non-academic field ,老说也很腻。
还有红宝书里那个埋头苦干怎么说我怎么想不起来了]
Faculty 定义是什么
可以和teacher professor 换着用吗
总不能通篇都是faculty 啊
我知道自己没有例子
今天看issue5,5 说不一定要引经据典也不一定要有例子
把要表达的表达清楚就好了
我感觉自己表达得比较清楚
只是还是觉得有例子支撑比较好
没想到该把例子放在哪
以及找些什么样的例子
始终觉得为了放例子而写列子不是件舒服的事
能写这么多字真是膜拜.
我觉得你的词汇已经不错啦,好多我不认识的红宝单词,![](https://oss.x-php.com/smile/IA3nBMveCaM9PCMTXwxtfn8cjKFjdgLh6Vanv7-XEhVw7mVhMzg~)
词汇有点重复,论证够充分还是能够得到5分的吧
不用模板是对的,最近看了坛子里好多贴都说不要用模板,而且我看ets3分标准很低,但中国学生那么多3分我猜想就是模板造成的吧,
至于例子,我觉得肯定还是要有的,不一定要是什么名人,想不出名人就举个路人来说明好了,one , individual,就是身边常见的实例,能证明你的观点就行.教育类的我也觉得不好举例.
你的提纲大概是这样的
1.校外工作的好处之理论和实践结合
2.不是所有学科需要校外工作,比如学术性学科
3.校外工作不好之不能在外过度
4.校外工作之会让老师不务正业.
5.提出建议方案
主要是讲要结合校外实践
但是从你的篇幅看来,讲不好的比好的要多,是不是可以平衡一下,还有多说说对学生的影响,比如指导就业什么的…
以上是我个人看法,仅供参考,自己水平不高,不要被我误导了 ![](https://oss.x-php.com/smile/72P6z97nCKMZj2KxVl4Hh2qbEt16csuQOrMHSV-eDVyaymE1Nzc~) |
|