- 最后登录
- 2021-12-3
- 在线时间
- 339 小时
- 寄托币
- 535
- 声望
- 83
- 注册时间
- 2015-4-1
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 181
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 626
- UID
- 3607599

- 声望
- 83
- 寄托币
- 535
- 注册时间
- 2015-4-1
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 181
|
发表于 2015-5-28 19:45:49
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 tesolchina 于 2015-5-28 20:33 编辑
71. The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times.
"Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just completed. Members of the town council already have suggested more road building to address the problem, but as well as being expensive, the new construction will surely disrupt some of our residential neighborhoods. It would be better to follow the example of the nearby city of Garville. Last year Garville implemented a policy that rewards people who share rides to work, giving them coupons for free gas. Pollution levels in Garville have dropped since the policy was implemented, and people from Garville tell me that commuting times have fallen considerably. There is no reason why a policy like Garville's shouldn't work equally well in Waymarsh."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
王老师的提纲:
According to the letter, Waymarsh should introduce a policy similar to that of Garville to encourage more drivers to share rides with others to solve a perceived traffic problem. This policy will be better than the road building project proposed by the city council. To evaluate this argument, we need more evidence about the surveys indicating the traffic problem, the policy implemented in Garville that is now proposed for Waymarsh, as well as its strengths and weaknesses relative to the road construction plan.
To begin with, we need to examine the surveys more critically to decide if there is indeed a traffic problem in Waymarsh.
这里主要讨论调查对象可能不同以及问卷调查对象的报告是否可靠 也许交通并没有变差
In addition, we need to collect more information about how the policy has changed the traffic in Garville and how a similar policy will affect people’s behaviors in Waymarsh.
这里主要关注政策是否真的在Garville 奏效 也许pollution减少另有原因 比如政府加强对工厂排污的管理 另外Garville的commute time是否真的减少了 仅凭和当地人谈话是否可靠
同时要讨论 gas coupon及share ride在Waymarsh是否被人接受 也许当地人都是土豪 不在乎那点钱 更关注隐私或安全问题
Finally, we need to compare the cost and benefits of the ride sharing policy with the proposed road construction project.
修路虽然很贵 但是可以用50年 和补贴汽油50年的费用对比如何
对当地人的滋扰可以转化为经济补偿 再和补贴汽油的费用对比
总之需要定量数据来对比两种方案
In conclusion, while the proposed policy seems useful, we need to collect more information to address the issues discussed above to evaluate the soundness of the argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
作业内容:
According to the letter, Waymarsh should introduce a policy similar to that of Garville to encourage more drivers to share rides with others to solve a perceived traffic problem. This policy will be better than the road building project proposed by the city council. To evaluate this argument, we need more evidence about the surveys indicating the traffic problem, the policy implemented in Garville that is now proposed for Waymarsh, as well as its strengths and weaknesses relative to the road construction plan.
To begin with, we need to examine the surveys more critically to decide if there is indeed a traffic problem in Waymarsh. If most of people in the survey now take bus or ride to work to decrease environment pollution, while they drove to work three years ago, the time they need to get to work should increase. If the situation talked above is true, the survey is not reliable and we can not get the conclusion that traffic in Waymarsh is becoming a problem.
题目讲的就是drive 你怎么能扯到坐巴士呢
你还是去看看我的范文吧
In addition, we need to collect more information about how the policy has changed the traffic in Garville and how a similar policy will affect people’s behaviors in Waymarsh. We need more evidence to make sure the policy really made a difference in Waymarsh. Maybe the drop in pollution level is due to the strict management about pollution, which means the policy did not effect. Whats's more, whether the commute time have really fallen considerably is still a question, we don't know the people who claimed commute time have fallen is reliable or not. Besides, before we introduce a policy similar to that of Garville, we need evidence to ensure gas coupon and share ride are acceptable in Waymarsh. Maybe people in Waymarsh are rich enough and don't like to use gas coupon, or they are too conventional to accept share ride.
to make sure 你不是要确保某种结果 而是要看会有什么结果
make a difference in Waymarsh? 你开什么玩笑啊 你搞清楚题目在说什么没啊
Whats's more, whether the commute time have really fallen considerably is still a question, we don't know the people who claimed commute time have fallen is reliable or not. 断句
conventional ?
Finally, we need to compare the cost and benefits of the ride sharing policy with the proposed road construction project. Though it is expensive to build a road which we can use 50 years, it cost more to supply gas coupon for 50 years. The affection of road construction of neighborhoods can be offset by the combination of financial compensation and gas coupon, in this situation we need evidence to compare the expense between compensation and road construction.
affection ?
The affection of road construction of neighborhoods can be offset by the combination of financial compensation and gas coupon, in this situation we need evidence to compare the expense between compensation and road construction. 断句
In conclusion, while the proposed policy seems useful, we need to collect more information to address the issues discussed above to evaluate the soundness of the argument.
写了四十几分钟,感觉高频果然不是盖的,真是难写,而且还是在有提纲的前提下。。。。
我建议你去把我的范文认真读几遍。你的argument完全没入门。
|
|